http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Morteza Sohrabi-Haghighat (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Evaluation of Seismic Performance Factors for High-Rise Steel Structures with Diagrid System
Morteza Sohrabi-Haghighat,Payam Ashtari 대한토목학회 2019 KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Vol.23 No.11
Diagrid system is a new tubular structural system in tall buildings which requires seismic performance factors (R, Ω0, Cd) for seismic design according to the loading and design codes. By considering the fact that the current codes do not include these factors, this paper aims to evaluate them based on the FEMA P695 methodology. For this purpose, five archetypes have been developed in a way that the structure story heights and span lengths are respectively equal to 4 and 6 meters; this makes the diagonal angles equal to 53.13 degrees. The response modification coefficient (R-factor) of the archetypes was calculated by the Uang method through iteration in analysis and design in OpenSees and ETABS software, respectively. Two types of analysis were carried out: non-linear static analysis (pushover analysis) and non-linear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA); the first evaluates ductility, μT, and over-strength factors, Ω, and the second evaluates “collapse margin ratio (CMR)”. At the end, computed “adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR)” was controlled by acceptable values of ACMR in the FEMA P695. Based on the results, the values of R-factor, over-strength factor, Ω0, and deflection amplification factor, Cd, are proposed to be 2.5, 2.0 and 2.5, respectively.
-
Comparison of the Nutritional Status Assessment Methods for Hemodialysis Patients
( Zahra Sohrabi ),( Atefeh Kohansal ),( Hanieh Mirzahosseini ),( Moein Naghibi ),( Morteza Zare ),( Neda Haghighat ),( Marzieh Akbarzadeh ) 한국임상영양학회 2021 Clinical Nutrition Research Vol.10 No.3
Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is prevalent among hemodialysis (HD) patients and is associated with poor outcomes. There are various methods for nutritional status evaluation in HD patients. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. We aimed at comparing the method validities of normalized protein catabolic ratio (nPCR) and malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) with subjective global assessment (SGA) in HD patients. We examined 88 HD patients using SGA and MUST questionnaires. The nPCRs were calculated using pre-dialysis and post-dialysis BUN and Kt/v. Also, PEW of patients was assessed based on the criteria of the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism. Methods' specificity, sensitivity, and precision rates were assessed. Correlations between methods were analyzed using Pearson-correlation. Based on the SGA, MUST, and nPCR methods, almost 41%, 30%, and 60% of patients had malnutrition, respectively. According to the criteria, more than 90% of patients had PEW. SGA was positively and significantly associated with MUST (p ≤ 0.001). Sensitivity for SGA, MUST, and nPCR methods were 100%,100%, 1.8%, and their specificity were 98%, 98%, and 4%, and their precision rates were 99.7%, 98.7%, and 3%, respectively. From various methods of nutritional assessment (SGA, MUST, and nPCR), compared to SGA as the common method of nutrition assessment in hemodialysis patients, MUST had the nearest specificity, sensitivity, and precision rate and nPCR method had the lowest ones. nPCR seems to be a flawed marker of malnutrition and it should be more investigated if MUST can be used instead of SGA.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
