http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Shuhana Perveen,Danielle Unwin,Amith L Shetty,Karen Byth 대한진단검사의학회 2014 Annals of Laboratory Medicine Vol.34 No.1
We have read with interest the comments made on our study ti- tled ‘Point of care (POC) D-dimer testing in the Emergency de- partment–a bioequivalence study’ [1]. Ekelund and Heilmann, referring to the results and conclu- sions of the study, have suggested that one of the discrepancies may be caused by a typographical error, and this inference prob- ably stems from the use of the term ‘range’ in the published arti- cle. This should have been termed ‘Bland-Altman limits of agree- ment’ (0.24-2.13) for all the cases where both tests were ordered and not just for the 8 POC-negative VIDAS (VIDAS D-dimer as- say; bioMérieux SA, RCS Lyon, France)-positive patients. The data have been reconfirmed by our database as not being a re- porting error.