http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Masumi Hasegawa ),( Hiroyuki Okamura ),( Mami Murakawa ),( Kazutoshi Takeuchi ),( Keiichi Yamada ),( Kiyotaka Uchikura ),( Noriyuki Harada ),( Junji Matsumura ) 한국목재공학회 2019 한국목재공학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.2019 No.1
Some fire-retardant woods with no documented fire performance have occasionally been sold in the market. It is important to know whether the required amount of chemical fire retardant is present in all sections of a wood sample. In this study, nondestructive measurement of chemical retention in fire-retardant treated wood was experimentally investigated using air-coupled ultrasonic and micro focus X-ray computed tomography. Wood samples were impregnated with different chemical concentrations. First, the ultrasonic wave velocities of wood samples were measured before and after impregnation. The percent changes in velocity exhibited a positive correlation with the chemical retention. Second, the images of wood sample were captured using X-ray CT before and after impregnation. The changes in integrated brightness values calculated from the captured images also showed a positive correlation with the chemical retention at a 1% significance level. These findings suggest that it is possible to evaluate the distributions of chemical retention in fire-retardant wood.
Suzuki Yugo,Ochiai Yorinari,Hosoi Atsuko,Okamura Takayuki,Hayasaka Junnosuke,Mitsunaga Yutaka,Tanaka Masami,Odagiri Hiroyuki,Nomura Kosuke,Yamashita Satoshi,Matsui Akira,Kikuchi Daisuke,Ohashi Kenichi 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 2024 Gut and Liver Vol.18 No.1
Background/Aims: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) is considered to be a potential precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there are few clinical parameters that can be used to evaluate the disease. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the factors involved in the symptoms of EoE by examining the clinicopathological differences between aEE and EoE. Methods: We reviewed 41 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and high-resolution manometry. They were divided into the aEE group (n=16) and the EoE group (n=25) using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score. The patients’ clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. Results: The median Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score was 3.0 in the aEE group and 10.0 in the EoE group. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, endoscopic findings and pathological findings. The cutoff value for wall thickening was 3.13 mm for the total esophageal wall thickness and 2.30 mm for the thickness from the surface to the muscular layer (total esophageal wall thickness: 84.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity; thickness from the surface to the muscular layer: 84.0% sensitivity, 68.7% specificity). The high-resolution manometry study was abnormal in seven patients (43.8%) in the aEE group and in 12 (48.0%) in the EoE group. The contractile front velocity was slower in the EoE group (p=0.026). Conclusions: The esophageal wall thickening in the lower portion of the esophagus is an important clinical factors related to the symptoms in patients with EoE.