http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Basile Njei (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Thomas R. McCarty,Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi,Basile Njei,Marvin Ryou,Harry R. Aslanian,Thiruvengadam Muniraj 대한소화기내시경학회 2020 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.53 No.5
Background/Aims: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PCLB) or transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) have traditionally been performed toobtain a sample of hepatic tissue; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUSLB) has become an attractive alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB. Methods: Search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Major outcomes included thefollowing: adequacy of biopsy specimens (i.e., complete portal triads [CPT], total specimen length [TSL] in mm, and length oflongest piece [LLP]) in mm), and rate of adverse events. Only studies comparing all biopsy approaches (i.e., EUSLB, PCLB, andTJLB) were included. Results: Five studies (EUSLB [n=301]; PCLB [n=176]; and TJLB [n=179]) were included. Biopsy cumulative adequacy rates forEUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB were 93.51%, 98.27%, and 97.61%, respectively. Based on the subgroup analysis limited to EUS biopsyneedles in current clinical practice, there was no difference in biopsy adequacy or adverse events for EUSLB compared to PCLB andTJLB (all p>0.050). A comparison of EUSLB and PCLB revealed no difference between specimens regarding both CPT (p=0.079) andLLP (p=0.085); however, a longer TSL (p<0.001) was observed. Compared to TJLB, EUSLB showed no difference in LLP (p=0.351),fewer CPT (p=0.042), and longer TSL (p=0.005). Conclusions: EUSLB appears to be a safe, minimally invasive procedure that is comparable to PCLB and TJLB regarding biopsyspecimens obtained and rate of adverse events associated with each method.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
