RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Microstructure Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Strain Hardening Instability of Low and Medium Carbon Quenching & Partitioning Steels

        Ramadan N. Elshaer,Mohamed K. El‑Fawakhry,Ahmed I. Z. Farahat 대한금속·재료학회 2022 METALS AND MATERIALS International Vol.28 No.6

        The effect of quenching after martensitic finish (QAMf) or quenching & partitioning (Q&P) on microstructure evolution,mechanical properties, and strain hardening instability of low and medium carbon hot rolled steels were investigated. Twoheats of low and medium carbon steels were cast in an induction open furnace. The chemical composition of low carbonsteel is 0.16C–0.27Si–1.47Mn–0.02Al while medium carbon steel is 0.49C–0.30Si–0.91Mn–0.03Al. They were hot-rolledat 1200 °C for 30 min followed by air cooling. The microstructure after hot-rolled gives bands of ferrite and pearlite for0.16 wt% low carbon steel. On the other hand, 0.49 wt% medium carbon steel produces coarse pearlite islands surrounded byferrite phase. To enhance mechanical properties, it was necessary to modify the microstructure of low and medium carbonsteels using QAMfor Q&P processes. The resultant matrix of microstructure after QAMfand Q&P processes containedferrite, bainite, lath martensite, and retained austenite for 0.16 wt% low carbon steel, and polygonal ferrite, lath martensite,and retained austenite for 0.49 wt% medium carbon steel, respectively. In low carbon steel, QAMfprocess increased uniformelongation from 6.6 to 13.5% (105% increase) while ultimate tensile strength (UTS) improved slightly from 645 to 692 MPa(7% increase). However, in medium carbon steel, Q&P reduced uniform elongation from 12.4 to 4.8% (61% decrease) whileincreased UTS from 769 to 1242 MPa (61.5% increase). It is worthy to mention that QAMfprocess exhibited strain hardeninginstability zone (7.8% strain before necking) compared to hot-rolled process (0% strain before necking). On the otherhand, Q&P process highly decreased strain hardening instability zone (0.77% strain before necking) compared to hot-rolledprocess (3.4% strain before necking).

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼