http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
정해도,문영준,Ahmad J. Almujalhem,Ali Abdullah Alqahtani,Mohammed Ali Alkhureeb,이주용 연세대학교의과대학 2022 Yonsei medical journal Vol.63 No.5
Purpose: This study presents our initial experience with endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for large renal stonesand compares the results of a propensity score-matched cohort of patients undergoing shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL). Materials and Methods: A total of 100 adults underwent ECIRS for renal stones between August 2017 and January 2019. For comparison,2172 patients who underwent a first session of SWL between January 2005 and May 2018 were included in the SWL cohort. Propensity score matching was performed using maximal stone length (MSL), mean stone density (MSD), and stone heterogeneityindex (SHI) scores. Stone-free rate (SFR) and success rate were compared between ECIRS and SWL. Results: In the ECIRS group, the mean MSL, mean MSD, and mean SHI were 28.7±15.2 mm, 1013.9±360.0 Hounsfield units (HU),209.4±104.0 HU, respectively. The SFR was 70%, and the success rate was 82.0% in this group. Although the ECIRS group had larger,harder, and more homogeneous stones than the SWL group, ECIRS showed a higher SFR and success rate than SWL. After propensity-score matching, SFR and success rate remained higher with ECIRS than with SWL (both, p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression,smaller stone size [odds ratio (OR): 0.947, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913–0.979, p=0.002] and lower Seoul NationalUniversity Renal Stone Complexity score (OR: 0.759, 95% CI: 0.610–0.935, p=0.011) were independent predictors of successful ECIRS. Conclusion: ECIRS showed a higher SFR and success rate than SWL for large renal stones. Smaller stone size and lower complexityof stones were associated with a higher likelihood of successful ECIRS.