RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구

        김설인,편도윤,정용익,조자현,노가야,배그린,권혜영 한국보건행정학회 2023 보건행정학회지 Vol.33 No.2

        Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the pointof care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classifyself-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique. Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs wereparallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors(n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer toquestionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel. Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214)were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued theease of specimen collection, but the citizen’s panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering thecharacteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease(0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitablefor non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen’s group responded thatself-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489). Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis ofnon-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices,taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼