http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 조희경 ( Heekyoung Cho ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
영국 저작재산권의 제한규정에 관한 소고: 공정취급 조항 (fair dealing)을 중심으로
조희경 ( Heekyoung Cho ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2015 홍익법학 Vol.16 No.2
There are many academic articles and textbooks that have been published on the topic of US copyright law in Korea. In contrast, it seems that there is comparatively little research being carried out on UK copyright law and it is rare to find articles or textbooks on the latter. More worryingly, what has been published often gets some basic things about the UK copyright wrong. For example, on the subject of limitations and exceptions to copyright, much has been written about the US law on the fair use exception. In the UK, there is no such thing as a “fair use” exception but there are provisions regarding “fair dealing” with copyright work. However, perhaps due to the similarity in their names, fair use and fair dealing, many people believe that these are similar provisions in content also. Thus when they classify different copyright law limitation and exception regimes around the world, they tend to distinguish between the continental style, with enumerated exceptions and limitations, and the Anglo-American style, the fair use/fair dealing exceptions. This stems from the mistaken belief that the fair use and fair dealing exceptions are alike. In fact, they are as different as continental systems are to the US system. Fair use is a general exception to copyright not limited by specific purpose. Fair dealing is a limited exception available only for certain specified purposes under the law. This article endeavours to clarify the differences between the US fair use regime and the UK’s fair dealing regime so that a more accurate comparative research can be undertaken in order to help develop Korea’s copyright law.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
