RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        한·중·일 장애인복지정책 비교연구

        김정희 ( Kim Jung-hee ),김경란 ( Kim Kyoung-ran ),이율희 ( Lee Yull-hee ) 한국장애인개발원 2015 장애인복지연구 Vol.6 No.1

        This primary purpose of this study is to analyse present conditions of each area of social welfare policies for persons with disabilities in three countries, Korea, China and Japan. Those countries are geographically adjacent to each other and both socially and culturally, they are considered to be very much alike. How this study looks into social welfare policies for persons with disabilities and recent changes in social welfares in East Asia could be a chance for the countries in East Asia to open a discussion over social welfare policies for persons with disabilities. In the light of that, the study has proceeded with its investigation and came up with implications related to the social welfare policies for persons with disabilities in Korea, China and Japan. The methodological strategy utilized in this study, called 'most similar systems' comparison design is fairly clear. In exercising these comparative logics, we have selected four comparative variables as income security, job security, medical rehabilitation security. In the light of income security, we have much in different of payment object qualification and finance, in terms of job security, there are some in common aspect of continuous development. In addition, in terms of medical rehabilitation security, three nations have steady policy of health for people with disabilities reflected their desire. The implications are provided as follows. First, the three countries need to secure and expand various acts to cope with all those different types of disability. Second, in 1981, UN declared the ‘Rights of Persons with Disabilities, International Year of Persons with Disabilities.’ Since then, the countries made a progress with their systems in relation to the rights of persons with disabilities. Third, it is the social integration and spread of co-existence philosophy. When the ultimate goal of a welfare state is believed to be going for goals of individuals in a stabilized society, improving quality of individual life, quality of the disabled’s life will be in a great correlation with quality of a society. Fourth, the three countries need to take demographic factors into consideration when they try to establish any new relevant policies. Korea, China and Japan are rapidly changing into an ageing society and because of that, they should pay attention more to changes in the population of persons with disabilities including a life cycle of those people when they design a relevant policy.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼