http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김기철(Ki-Chul Kim),이계성(Kye-Seong Lee):정 건(Gun Jung),신상은(Sang-Eun Shin) 한국중독정신의학회 2004 중독정신의학 Vol.8 No.2
Objectives:The purpose of this study estimate level of insight and defense mechanisms in alcoholic patients and investigate the relationship between insight level and defense mechanisms in them. Method:The subjects participated in this study were 94 alcoholic patients who were diagnosed as alcohol dependence by DSM-IV and admitted to Incheon Christian Hospital and EunHei Hospital between November, 2003 and February, 2004. The subjects were surveyed by questionnaire about the sociodemographic data, HAIS, Ewha Defense Mechanism Test and Ways of Coping checklist. Results:First, we compared the defense mechanisms between the fair insight group and the poor insight group the fair insight group had significant higher scores than poor insight group in projection, identification, somatization, actingout, regression, controlling, rationalization, dissociation. Second, we evaluated the average scores of each defense mechanisms acting-out had the highest average score among the defense mechanisms. Second was denial, third was show-off. And then, we grouped the defense mechanisms by maturity level, fair insight group had significant higher scores than poor insight group in immature and neurotic level. In the Ways of Coping Checklist, fair insight group had higher scores than poor insight group in emotion-focused coping rather than problem-focused coping. Conclusion:The fair insight group had relatively higher scores using projection, identification, somatization, acting-out, regression, controlling, rationalization, dissociation and emotionfocused coping than poor insight group. These results may reflect the characteristics of fair insight group which they show some reality as they begin to have insight but at the same time, they have difficulty in admitting the reality when they are confronted with it.