RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 개정 경관법에 따른 서울시 경관정책 개선방향 연구

        박현찬(Hyun-Chan Bahk),민승현(Seung-Hyun Min),정상혁(Sang-Hyeok Jeong),김승주(Seung-Ju Kim),오정혁(Jeong-Hyun Oh),김수연(Soo-Yeon Kim) 서울연구원 2014 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

        Legislation of landscape law in 2007 established legal ground for local government to manage landscape autonomously, but management policy without binding authorities and conceptual master plan failed to form, manage and preserve the landscape features. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport proclaimed the amendment of landscape law in 2013 to strengthen the weak points of the landscape law 2007. Three main points of revised landscape law are summarized as follows : 1) Setting up the central governmental roles in landscape management, 2) Granting local government legal force to control landscape, 3) Compulsory landscape deliberation of infrastructure project, development project, buildings. This research aimed to determine the direction for revision of Seoul landscape master plan and Seoul landscape ordinance. There are four improvements taking into account of amendments of landscape law and the current landscape master plan. 1) Landscape plan and design guideline system should be simplified for usability. The general landscape plan and specific landscape plan need to be consolidated into the landscape master plan and for greater efficiency of the plan. Eleven-design guidelines also should be summed up in general and specific principles to avoid duplicate of contents. At the same time, government should provide all the information of administrative procedures in relation to landscape management through building up comprehensive information system, education and public relations, etc. 2) This study suggested landscape deliberation subjects and project size which were delegated municipal landscape ordinance. Additional deliberation subjects were chosen from the projects in the act on the private investment through examination for the factors which have a negative effect on landscape. And project size of infrastructure project was decided based on estimated number of deliberation cases. 3) It is better to have relevant committees dealt with landscape issues with fulfilling their original duties for a while than to compose separate landscape committee. But landscape deliberative committee will be considered to be organized in the future for effective landscape management. As a control tool of landscape, the research suggested revision of landscape and aesthetic control district based on the actual conditions of the districts. 4) Differentiation strategies of landscape project and agreement were proposed from human town project. landscape project and agreement should be used a compensation for imposing controls of private property in landscape and aesthetic control district. To promote resident-driven project, it is considered to run idea contests for improving neighborhood landscape such as revisitable placemaking, supporting implementation of specific landscape plan. Without consideration of the present condition, it is very difficult to establish practicable landscape plan. Thus, analysing limitation of existing landscape plan, researching current status of landscape and aesthetic control district needs to conducted before starting landscape master plan making. If necessary, amendment or enactment of landscape ordinances can be suggested to execute landscape plan.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼