http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),황두희(Doohee Hwang),성영조(Youngjo Seong),임종빈(Jongbin Im),정승용(Sungyong Jung) 과학기술정책연구원 2022 STEPI Insight Vol.- No.303
● This study is to diagnose Koreas innovation cluster policy and draw policy issues through the case studies of domestic and foreign innovation clusters. ● Innovation clusters play a key role in national and regional development in Korea. In particular, since the 2000s, the Korean government has recognized the importance of innovation clusters and fostered various type of innovation clusters. The representative examples of innovation clusters such as Daedeok Innopolis and Pangyo Technovalley are leading national/regional technological innovation and economic growth. Now, Korean government needs a new and better innovation cluster policy to solve challenges such as regional extinction due to low birth rate and aging, and to promote the regional sustainable development. Moreover, it is necessary to have a smarter innovation cluster policy because the economic, social, and innovation environment is rapidly changing with the emergence of 4th Industrial Revolution. ● Most of the innovation clusters established by the central government have produced good results but also have shown limitations. Many innovation clusters tend to rely on national funds and programs and show the sustainability issue. In addition, the strict regulations and low level of living conditions hinder the growth of innovation clusters. When the innovation cluster is established as part of urban development, it tends to provide better living conditions. It is found out that successful overseas innovation cluster are located in urban areas where the start-ups and new industries are developed easily. ● It is suggested that the innovation cluster policy has to consider the differences of development patterns between the metropolitan area and the provinces and the type of innovation clusters. Secondly, to secure sustainable innovation cluster, smart specialization is necessary and the initial program should be at least over 10 years to make the university, industry and research institute network rooted in the region. Finally, it is suggested to conduct systematic policy research on various innovation clusters at national level to coordinate them and draw the customized policies.