http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 서태경(Seo TaeKyung) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
서태경(Seo, TaeKyung) 한양법학회 2009 漢陽法學 Vol.25 No.-
This paper studied the interpretative issues about clause 1 of Article 313 regarding the establishment of clause 5 of Article 312 on Criminal Procedure Act. In this paper, the issues which are discussed newly according to the establishment of clause 5 of Article 312 are examined and the existing issues are also reviewed in view of the purpose that above stipulation is established newly. The issues are the scope of written statement which is the object to apply clause 1 of Article 313 before and after the revision of Criminal Procedure Act, the evidence for the authenticity for establishment as the necessary condition for admissibility of evidence of written statement, the relation between the text of the statement and the proviso, the matter for co-defendant as co-offenders and the relation between clause 1 of Article 313 and Article 314. First of all, this paper makes clear the object to apply clause 1 of Article 313 on the revised Criminal Procedure Act. And it says that the evidence for the authenticity of written statement can be testified by only the statement of the original person making a statement except the written which is made in procedure of criminal investigation. And this paper regards that the interpretation that the words "the documents writing the statement of a defendant" on the proviso of clause 1 of Article 313 means only the document on which the statement of a defendant is recorded by a private person is reasonable for the context interpretation of clause 1 of Article 313. Also, it makes clear that the object of Article 314 among the objects to apply clause 1 of Article 313 should be limited the statement of the person who is not a defendant or the transcript of tape-recording for the statement of the person who is not a defendant.
-
서태경(Seo TaeKyung) 한양법학회 2008 漢陽法學 Vol.24 No.-
This thesis discusses the practicality of compulsory investigation procedures in relation to internal body searches conducted by the criminal investigation institution under the current Criminal Procedure Law(CPL). It will focus on the representative typical cases of (1) X-ray examination identifying the features of internal body (2) compulsory sampling of urine or blood (3) forced outlets of objects in a throat, etc. Current criminal procedure law doesn’t clearly stipulate the compulsory investigation methods mentioned above. Therefore, this paper addresses the priority for the protection of the human rights in light of cases where serious infringement to the personal human rights has occurred by the compulsory criminal investigation. Therefore, the compulsory measures outlined in points (1) and (2) above are made feasible by the examination permit requested by the prosecutor and issued by the judge under Articles of the Criminal Procedure Law 221-4. In addition, method (3) could be executed by the issuance of a search warrant under Article 215 in addition to examination permit according to Article 212-4. The above position could be presented based on the traditional view of discriminating the characteristic, subject and object of the compulsory disposition according to Article 109; internal body searches, Articles 140 and 141; full body searches, Article 173(I); body searches as well as considering the need for the protection of personal human rights. Thus, full body searches without a warrant should not be conducted by the compulsory criminal investigation in any given situation. In addition, an investigation institution can not independently carry out the compulsory examination even with the support of professionals such as medical doctors. This position contributes to the protection of personal human rights. This does however raise potential difficulties in applying the law to situations where there is need for urgent disposition of compulsory blood sampling without a warrant in drink driving cases. However, this problem needs to be addressed by the relevant legislation. Thus, the only practical necessity of compulsory blood sampling is not justified to be included under the scope of body searches described in the law.
-
공법분야 투고논문 : 녹음매체에 대한 녹취서의 증거법상 지위와 증거조사 방법에 대한 소고
서태경 ( Taekyung Seo ) 한양대학교 법학연구소 2015 법학논총 Vol.32 No.3
녹취서 또는 녹취록은 사람의 목소리가 녹음된 녹음매체를 재생하여 청취하면서 녹음매체에 녹음된 사람의 목소리로 전달되는 정보의 내용을 문자로 그대로 옮겨 적은 서면을 말한다. 최근 녹음매체가 공판정에서 증거방법으로서 흔하게 제출됨에 따라 녹취서 역시 녹음매체와 함께, 또는 단독으로 법원에 증거로 제출되고 있다. 이러한 녹취서의 증거법적 성질이나 증거조사 방법은 녹음매체에 비하여 그간 심도 있는 논의가 이루어지지 않았다. 다만 녹취서의 증거능력이나 법적 성질에 관하여 녹음매체가 전문법칙이 적용되는 증거인지 여부와 관계없이 녹취서를 전문증거나 재전문증거·재재전문증거로 볼수 있다는 일부 견해가 있었다. 본논문은 이러한 주장의 이론적 문제점을 지적하고 그 대안으로서 녹취서를 녹음매체에 대한 사본의 성질을 갖는 증거로 보아야 함을 주장하였다. 녹취서에 대한 증거조사는 증거서류 등의 사본에 대한 증거조사 방법과 동일하게 녹취서의 증거능력에 관한 조사와 증거능력이 인정되는 경우 본증으로서의 조사절차로 구별되어 이루어져야 함을 전제로 그 조사 방법을 구체적으로 검토하였다. 이러한 증거조사 절차를 거쳐 공소사실을 인정할 증거가 된 경우, 판결서의 증거 요지란에는 ‘녹취서의 기재’로 표시하면 충분하다는 견해를 밝혔다. Transcript of tape-recoding is a document into which the content of the information delivered by the human voice recorded on the recording medium is written. Recently transcript of tape-recording is submitted to court as evidence, with recording medium, or alone. Legal nature or investigation as evidence of transcript of tape-recoding has not been discussed in depth than the recording medium. But there are views that the transcript of tape-recoding is hearsay or multiple hearsay regardless of whether the recording medium is hearsay or not. In this paper, I point out the theorectical problems of this views and argue that the transcript of tape-recoding has the characteristics of a copy of the recording medium. Examination method of transcript of tape-recoding is made the same methode as the copy of documentary evidence. In other word, investigation on admissibility of evidence requirements and investigation as evidence to prove criminal facts must be made separately. Therefore, investigation of transcript of tape-recoding as evidence to prove criminal facts can be made after finding that the transcript of tape-recoding meets admissibility of evidence requirements. Based upon the ways in which they are shown above, in this paper, I explain concretely about examination method of transcript of tape-recoding. When the transcript of tape-recoding is accepted as evidence to prove criminal facts, it should be written ‘description of the transcript of tape-recoding’ as gift of the evidence on the judgement document.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
