http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김연찬 ( Younchan Kim ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
김연찬 ( Younchan Kim ) 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2004 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.34
The theme of base structures for bare infinitive constructions runs throughout this paper. The former transformational grammar tried to explain these constructions with Raising rule. which raises a subject of an embedded sentence to the object position of the matrix sentence. But dass-sentence has a different meaning from the corresponding bare infinitive construction. The dass-sentence presupposes the simultaneity. while a bare infinitive construction does not. On this ground I insist that perception verbs have the same structure (under 4b) as other trivalent verbs. This analysis is true of the verb lassen. Personal and reflexive pronouns stand in complementary relation to each other. This article shows which of the two pronouns is right for each bare infinitive construction. Above all, I stick to the opinion that grammar is a set of syntactic rules and sentences in one form. Thus, it should be handled uniformly and consistently with same rules: (1) a. Der Gefangenei lasst den Polizisten auf *sichi/ihni achten. b. Hansi lasst Maria zu sichi/*ihmi kommen. (2) a. Peteri sieht Hans von *sichi/ihmi betrogen. b. Hansi fuhlt die Freundin von sichi/*ihmi weggezogen. In the case of examples in (1) and (2), the difference in distribution of pronouns is based on individual language uses. not on grammatical rules. The base structure for bare infinitive constructions looks like (4b), not (4a): (3) a. leh sehe mich mude b. Ich fuhle mich viel besser. (4) a. IP b. IP --------- --------- NP VP NP VP --------- --------- IP V NP V`` --------- IP V
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
