http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 권경원 (검색결과 60 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
권경원 목원대학교 인문과학연구소 2002 인문과학 Vol.11 No.-
The purpose of this paper is to provide two levels of conceptualization of category such as an absolute category in semantic level end a relative category in pragmatic level on the basis of Aristotelian category theory and prototype category theory. I do not intend to criticize classical category theory and prototype category theory but to show that these two types of category are applied different world. According to the Aristotelian category theory, (1) A category in defined by inherent properties of members and individuals are divided into category members and non-category members. (2) All the members of a category have as equal qualification. (3) All the members of a category share common properties and the individual which has such properties have to be a member of the category. (4) There is a clear difference between category members and non-category members. This classical theory is based on objectivity and binary system.
-
-
-
-
-
-
It의 지시적 가치(Referential Value)에 대한 연구
권경원 연세대학교 대학원 1984 원우론집 Vol.12 No.1
It is often said that "it" in English is divided into two parts, that is, anaphoric pronoun "it" which has an antecedent and non-anaphoric pronoun "it" which does not have an antecedent. According to the transformational grammarians, the former is derived by pronominalization and the latter is derived by it-insertion and extraposition, which is considered as a dummy element that has only grammatical function. In other words they say that non-anaphoric pronoun "it" is used to fill in the empty subject position. Consider the following examples. (1) a. I found a book and it was interesting. b. It is obvious that the world is round. c. It is raining. d. What is this? It is a tree. (1, a) is an example which is derived by pronomianalization and (1, b) is derived by extraposition. (1, c) is an example of it-insertion. (1, d) which is deictic is ued in the situation which both a speaker and a hearer can see a referred thing (1, d) is also treated as non-anaphoric pronoun because transformational grammar is based on sentences. As you know from the previous examples "it" is derived by three kinds of rules. (1, a) is an example of substitution transformation (pronominalization). (1, bc) are examples which "it" is used by structural necessity (extraposed "it" and ambient "it"). (1, d) is generated by the base rule. Traditional gammarians (Jespersen, Zandvoort, Quirk) also holds the same position as the transformational grammarians in that non-anaphoric pronoun "it" is a meaningless element. In this paper I argure that all kinds of "it" has a common thread, because "it" has a referential vague. In other words all kinds of "it" refers to something in the context. Consider the following examples. (2) a. What is this? It is a book. b. I took the book from the table and placed it on the shelf. c. Don't do it. d. How is it going? It goes well. c. It is late. f. It is raining. g. It is not true that Jane is intelligent. (2, a) is the basic use of "it" because "it" is used to refer something in the concrete and visible situation. From my viewpoint all kinds of it is an extended use of (2, a). (2, b) which might be extended from (2, a) is used to refer something invisible that is antecedent. Because of this "it" in (2, b) might be called anaphoric pronoun. "It" in (2, c) is used to refer to an immediate situation, which is also extended from (2, b). "It" in (2, def) refers to general situation presupposed by both a speaker and a bearer which is extended from (2, c). (2, g) refers to abstract general situation which might be called ground of conversation. In conclusion we can say that all kinds of "it" has a common thread on the basis of the previous examples. Ambient "it" and extraposed "it" is not used to fill in the subject position as a meaningless element but has a referential value as a semantic value. Because of this it seemed that it-insertion and extraposition is not optional.
-
권경원 충남대학교 교지편집위원회 1996 寶雲 - 충남대학교 Vol.- No.27
이제는 신화가 된 80년대의 골고다언덕을 지나 90년대를 살아오는 동안 우리는 항상 ‘위기는 유령이다’라는 한 한학자의 당찬 은유를 받아들이며 살아왔지만, 그 위기는 곳곳에서 구조화되어 신심에 찬 혁명적 고스트바스터도 퇴치하지 못할 괴물이 되어있는 것이 사실이다. 그 위기는 고 노수석집회 사수를 위한 과토론회에서 ‘노수석이 왜 역사냐?’라는 질문을 받고 고전을 면치 못하는 과대표의 머리속에도 있고, 모여있으되 서로 주고받음이 없는 도서관에도 있으며, 사상과 이론을 논쟁하기는 하나 합의하려고 하지 않는 진보적 학술계간지에도 있을 뿐만 아니라, 사상의 위기를 넘어 생존의 위기를 겪고있는 온갖 운동권 조직 총노선의 머리말에도 여지없이 등장한다. ‘위기는 유령이다’라는 매혹적인 선동에 기대왔던 사람들이라면 위의 인용이 그리 유쾌하지만은 않으리라,
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
