http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 관단단 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
한국과 중국의 마을비보숲 식생 비교 - 한국(韓國) 진안(鎭安)과 중국(中國) 청주(靑州)를 사례로 -
박재철,관단단,정경숙,Park, Jae Chul,Gwan, Dan Dan,Jung, Kyoung Sook 한국조경학회 2013 韓國造景學會誌 Vol.41 No.6
The purpose of this study is to compare the vegetation structure in complementary forests of villages between Korea and China. For this study, Jinan in Korea and Qingzhou in China were selected through a pre-survey about the representative regions of both countries. The main research method used was field study. A comparative analysis between the two regions was performed by a frequency analysis of the surveyed data. The data obtained in the study shows the vegetation structure in complementary forests of villages in the two regions have many differences which are related to the local culture. As a result, it was identified that the average number of species was the same at 2.9 and the average number of trees, total number of trees, and tree density in Qingzhou were considerably greater than those in Jinan. Also, it was identified that tree height, average breadth height diameter and crown width in Jinan were considerably greater than those in Qingzhou. Furthermore, it was identified that both the forest state and the principal species of tree are both very different according to the different cultures. Through this identification, it is considered that this study will be helpful in establishing policy direction in both countries about the restoration and management of complementary forests. 본 연구는 한국과 중국의 마을 비보숲의 식생을 비교하기 위하여 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 한국과 중국의 대표적인 마을 비보숲이 잔존하는 지역을 예비조사를 통해 확인하여 한국의 진안과 중국의 청주를 선정하였다. 주요 조사방법은 현장조사이고, 조사된 두 지역에 대한 비교 고찰을 위하여 빈도분석이 이루어졌다. 이를 통해 두 지역의 차이로 인해 마을 비보숲의 식생의 특성에 있어서 많은 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 분석결과, 두 지역의 평균 종수는 2.9종으로 같았다. 그러나 평균 개체수, 총 개체수, 입목밀도는 청주가 진안에 비해 상당히 큰 것으로 나타났다. 또한 수고, 평균 흉고직경, 수관폭은 진안이 청주보다 상당히 큰 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 임상과 주요 수종 역시 매우 다른 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 한국과 중국의 특성을 살린 마을 비보숲의 복원과 관리의 정책 방향을 마련하는 데 도움이 될 것으로 사료된다.
-
한국과 중국의 마을비보숲 비교 -한국(韓國) 진안(鎭安)과 중국(中國) 청주(靑州)를 사례로-
박재철 ( Jae Chul Park ),관단단 ( Dan Dan Gwan ),정경숙 ( Kyoung Sook Jung ) 한국농촌계획학회 2012 농촌계획 Vol.18 No.2
The purpose of this study is on comparing complementary forest of village between Korea and China. For this, Jinan of Korea and Qingzhou of China were selected through the pre-survey about the representative region of both country. The main research method was literature study, field study and interview with local residents. The comparative analysis between two regions was performed by frequency analysis of surveyed data. Which shows complementary forest of village in two regions has so much in common and also has many differences which is related with the local practical life. As a result, it was identified that the area and remained number, concentration degree of Jinan were greater than those of Cheongju. But it was identified that the linear form and location were similar in both regions. Through these identification, it is helpful to establish policy direction of both countries about the complementary forest.
코리아스칼라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
