http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
상수처리과정에서 국내 생활계 유해폐기물 발생특성 및 관리방안 연구
閔達基(Dal-Ki Min) 한국환경관리학회 2007 環境管理學會誌 Vol.13 No.2
생활패턴이 변화함에 따라 생활계 내에서 배출된 각종 유해폐기불이나 폐기물 용기들은 별도의 관리없이 종량제 봉투에 담겨져 배출되고 있으나, 정작 생활계 유해폐기물에 대한 정의나 관리체계가 구축되어 있지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 일상 생활활동 내에서 손쉽게 발생하는 페인트류, 광택제류, 수은함유 폐기물, 농약류, 세제용기류, 약품용기류 등의 6대 제품군에 대한 관리방안을 강구하기 위하여 발생특성 및 장래 배출량 예측, 관리 개선방안 등을 제시하였다. 현행 폐기물관련 법규에서 생활계 유해폐기물에 대해서 폐페인트와 농약류는 지정폐기물로, 살충제, 유독물제품은 폐기물부담금으로, 살충제 및 유독물용기, 세제용기, 약품용기 등 용기류와 전지, 형광등은 EPR 품목으로 관리하고 있으며, 광택제류에 대한 관리 규정은 부재하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 생활계 유해폐기물에 대한 관리방안의 개선책으로는 기존의 폐기물관련 법률 체계하에서 생활계 유해폐기물의 관리를 보완하는 방법이 있기는 하지만, 이들 품목을 (가칭) 생활계 유해폐기불로 규정하여 단일 관리하는 방안을 제시하고자 한다. This paper is a research on the management of household hazardous wastes (HHW). According as life pattern changes rapidly, various HHWs have been discharged in the refuse bag without adequate management. But the definition of HHWs and administration system is not exist in Waste Management Law. In order to devise a proper management of six sorts of HHWs such as paints, solvents, mercury contained wastes, pesticides, surfactants and drug cases, we suggest a wasted amount in present and future estimate of HHWs. In present Law, paint and pesticide are managed as a specified waste, toxic chemical is managed as a waste burden item, container of toxic chemical, surfactant and drug, and battery and fluorescent light are managed as a EPR item, but solvent is not managed in present. Althought can supplement administration way under existent waste management legislation system, integrated management of HHWs do way to understand need.
민달기(Dal-Ki Min),서광석(Kwang-Seok Seo) 한국환경보건학회 2013 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.39 No.3
Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to define the level of recycling standards and its process in paper scrap. As pollution is increased by improperly treated paper scrap, the government has recently strengthened the management of the paper scrap. Methods: In this study, the current status of paper scrap recycling was investigated through a 2012 field survey, and the classification and recycling standards for paper scrap in developed countries and institutions were also investigated through a literature review in order to introduce optimal recycling standards. Results: As a result, the contents of contaminants were identified as the most important recycling standard, and the contents of contaminants in paper scrap was measured at less than 1.0% at most companies. The recycling standard for paper scrap was determined to be below 3% contaminants in the case of paper and 5% in the case of board. In this study, recycling stage was determined by considering regulations on resources and practices in the field. Conclusions: The recycling standard for paper scrap was determined to be below 3% and 5% contaminants for paper and board, respectively.