http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( Richard A. Jepsen ) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Are Drop-Impact Phenomena Described by Rayleigh-Taylor or Kelvin-Helmholtz Theory?
Yoon, Sam S.,Jepsen, Richard A.,James, Scott C.,Liu, Jie,Aguilar, Guillermo Taylor Francis 2009 Drying technology Vol.27 No.3
<P> Drop impact, spreading, fingering, and snap-off are important inmany engineering applications such as spray drying, industrial painting, environmentally friendly combustion, inkjet printing, materials processing, fire suppression, and pharmaceutical coating. Controlling drop-impact instability is crucial to designing optimized systems for the aforementioned applications. Classical Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) theory has been widely used to analyze fingering where instabilities at the leading edge of the toroidal ring form fingers that may ultimately snap off to form small droplets. In this study, we demonstrate the inapplicability of RT theory, in particular because it fails to explain the stable regimes observed under conditions of low air density and the instabilities observed when a drop impacts a pool of equal-density fluid. Specifically, finger instability decreases with decreasing air density, whereas the RT theory suggests that instability should remain unchanged. Moreover, experiments show that fingers form upon impact of a dyed water drop with a water pool, whereas the RT theory predicts noinstability when the densities of the two interacting fluids are equal. Experimental evidence is instead consistent with instability predictions made using the shear-driven Kelvin-Helmholtz theory.</P>
-
Park, Hong-Bok,Yoon, Sam S.,Jepsen Richard A.,Heister Stephen D. The Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Sys 2006 한국액체미립화학회지 Vol.11 No.2
An inviscid axisymmetric model capable of predicting droplet bouncing and the detailed pre-impact motion, influenced by the ambient pressure, has been developed using boundary element method (BEM). Because most droplet impact simulations of previous studies assumed that a droplet was already in contact with the impacting substrate at the simulation start, the previous simulations could not accurately describe the effect of the gas compressed between a failing droplet and the impacting substrate. To properly account for the surrounding gas effect, an effect is made to release a droplet from a certain height. High gas pressures are computationally observed in the region between the droplet and the impact surface at instances just prior to impact. The current simulation shows that the droplet retains its spherical shape when the surface tension energy is dominant over the dissipative energy. When increasing the Weber number, the droplet surface structure is highly deformed due to the appearance of the capillary waves and, consequently, a pyramidal surface structure is formed; this phenomenon was verified with our experiment. Parametric studies using our model include the pre-impact behavior which varies as a function of the Weber number and the surrounding gas pressure.
-
Experimental Splash Studies of Monodisperse Sprays Impacting Variously Shaped Surfaces
Yoon, Sam S.,Kim, Ho Y.,Lee, Dongjo,Kim, Namsoo,Jepsen, Richard A.,James, Scott C. Taylor Francis 2009 Drying technology Vol.27 No.2
<P> Despite numerous studies of the drop impact phenomena, studies of the fundamental mechanisms of how the splash corona and subsequent necking yield splashed droplets, not to mention characteristics of these splashed droplets, remain a subject of great interest. Here, we consider a simple question: After impact, what are the characteristics of splashed droplets? Spatial variations in the fraction of splashed liquid, Sauter mean diameter, and drop-size distribution for water and diesel impacting onto variously shaped rods are reported. Liquid drops of nearly uniform size are continuously injected onto a 2-mm-diameter aluminum cylindrical rod at velocities of up to 17 m/s. The impact face of the rod is flat with angles from &thgr; = 0 to 60° or it has a concave, convex, or conical shape. The experimental results indicate that diesel breaks up more easily than water due to its low surface tension. However, due to increased energy loss through viscous dissipation during drop collapse and spreading, dispersion of diesel drops upon and after impact is less energetic than that of water since diesel droplets do not travel as fast or as far as water droplets. During corona formation, stretching and necking of diesel drops before their snap-off are particularly evident due to diesel's high viscosity. Size distribution of splashed diesel droplets is more uniform than that of water near the impact region and water is more uniform further away.</P>
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
