RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • From “Public” to Where? How Looks “Latent Property Transition” at the Chinese State Assets in the Light of 2004-2006 “Big Discussion”

        ( Mikhail Karpov ) 국민대학교 유라시아연구소 2012 Eurasian Review Vol.5 No.-

        In summer 2004 Hong Kong based famous economist Lang Xianping (Larry Lang) made a number of harsh critical statements regarding state property reform in Mainland China. This critic provoked big discussion among leading Chinese economists (perhaps the biggest one in the recent decade) and seriously polarized public opinion. The core of the discussion were the questions concerning economic nature and socio-political consequences of the state assets passing via semi-legal ways into private hands, managers` “moral hazard”, state sector efficiency and trustful corporate governance in today`s China. Many observers, irrespective whether they agree or oppose to Lang Xianping`s critic, tended to recognize the current “property transition” at Chinese state assets as privatization. The article below argues that the processes going on and even accelerating in the recent couple of years in Chinese state sector are by no means a privatization in the strict sense. They represent a sort of a contract between the party-state organs and state assets` management allowing the latter to dispose of the assets in the already existing setting of “multiple-track” contract pricing which took shape by mid-90s. Although not a classical privatization these steps constitute an important and perhaps unavoidable stage prior to it.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼