http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( James M. Acton ) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
The Present and Future of the Non-Proliferation Regime
( James M. Acton ) 국방대학교 안보문제연구소 2008 The Korean Journal of Security Affairs Vol.13 No.2
The non-proliferation regime currently faces an unprecedented challenge: managing growing demands for nuclear disarmament at a time when nuclear energy is expected to spread widely. Although superficially unrelated, the tension between these two objectives is much greater than generally recognized. Specifically, recent cases of non-compliance, North Korea and Iran most notably, have demonstrated serious weaknesses in the existing non-proliferation regime. If new and more robust rules are not enacted to prevent nuclear facilities, materials and knowledge being subverted for military ends, the spread of nuclear weapons will become ever more likely. In turn, nuclear weapon states will become even more reluctant than they currently are to work toward the elimination of their nuclear arsenals. Many non-nuclear weapon states, however, state that they will only assist in strengthening the regime after the weapons states have fulfilled their promise to work in good faith toward disarmament. Breaking this circularity will be a considerable challenge. This paper explores the role that disarmament has to play. A vital component of an effective non-proliferation strategy is to increase the willingness of the vast majority of non-nuclear weapon states-those that are in compliance with their international obligations and not seeking nuclear weapons-to agree to tougher non-proliferation rules. However, many non-nuclear weapon states view such rules as an unnecessary burden and so co-opting them will require a quid pro quo, namely fulfillment of the pledge made in article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to work in good faith toward the eventual abolition of nuclear weapons. A key issue in pursuing a policy of `disarmament for non-proliferation` is ensuring that the nuclear weapon states do get credit for the disarmament actions they take. They must convince non-nuclear weapon states that their actions are part of a long-term effort aimed at eventually eliminating nuclear weapons. One way of achieving this is for all states to initiate a serious conversation on the challenges of abolishing nuclear weapons and their potential solutions. Such a conversation would also help non-nuclear weapon states to realize the roll that they have to play in creating a security architecture robust enough to enable nuclear weapons to be safely prohibited. Such a conversation would need to include India, Israel and Pakistan and facilitating it will involve creating a new forum-probably on the non-governmental level. The paper concludes by discussing two examples of the challenges with which states will have to engage if they are truly to take disarmament seriously: the role of extended deterrence in preventing proliferation and the future of the civilian nuclear industry.
-
해외 정보 - 일본의 플루토늄 문제를 해결하기 위한 현실적 접근
Acton, James M. 한국원자력산업회의 2016 원자력산업 Vol.36 No.1
일본은 사용후연료의 재처리 정책을 진행하고 있으나 고속증식로 계획이 지연됨에 따라 그 처리의 목표가 확실하지 못하다. MOX(Mixed-Oxide Fuel : 혼합 산화물 연료)에 의한 처리가 계획되어 있으나 상당히 어려운 상황이다. 또 2018년에 미 일 원자력협력협정의 갱신이 예정되어 있는데 이 플루토늄의 취급이 문제가 될 예정이다. 미국은 핵무기의 원료나 테러에 사용할지도 모르는 플루토늄의 확산을 경계하고 있기 때문이다.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
