RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Power Factor Control for Hybrid Type Power Quality Conditioner

        Yamagiwa, Kyohei,Kobayashi, Yuta,Aoki, Mutsumi,Ukai, Hiroyuki,Ueda, Fukashi,Kobayashi, Hiroshi The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2012 The Journal of International Council on Electrical Vol.2 No.4

        In recent years, power quality in distribution system becomes to be greatly concerned. There are two power quality problems greatly. One is the voltage rise, the other is harmonics voltage. The voltage rise in distribution system is caused by leading current from Static Capacitors (SCs) which are widely installed at receiving points by consumers to improve power factor. Especially, the voltage rise is caused in light-load time, because of the excessive amount of SCs. On the other hand, the harmonic voltages are caused by nonlinear loads such as power electronics devices. Since harmonic currents from nonlinear loads flow through the line and transformers, the voltage is distorted. To improve those problems of power quality, Hybrid type Power Quality Conditioner (HyPQC) is proposed. HyPQC is consist of the power electronics converter and LC circuit, it could compensate the reactive current and harmonic currents from loads. In order to use for practical application, the experimental test should be performed. From this background, this paper presents the control algorithm to compensate the reactive current and harmonic currents in case of changing the loads. The simulation and experimental results are also presented using the proto type model.

      • KCI등재

        Comparison of post-operative threedimensional and two-dimensional evaluation of component position for total knee arthroplasty

        ( Osamu Tanifuji ),( Tomoharu Mochizuki ),( Hiroshi Yamagiwa ),( Takashi Sato ),( Satoshi Watanabe ),( Hiroki Hijikata ),( Hiroyuki Kawashima ) 대한슬관절학회 2021 대한슬관절학회지 Vol.33 No.-

        Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post-operative three-dimensional (3D) femoral and tibial component positions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by the same co-ordinates’ system as for pre-operative planning and to compare it with a two-dimensional (2D) evaluation. Materials and methods: Sixty-five primary TKAs due to osteoarthritis were included. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the femur and tibia was obtained and pre-operative 3D planning was performed. Then, 3D and 2D postoperative evaluations of the component positions were performed. KneeCAS (LEXI, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), a lowerextremity alignment assessment system, was used for the 3D post-operative evaluation. Standard short-knee radiographs were used for the 2D post-operative evaluation. Differences between the pre-operative planning and post-operative coronal and sagittal alignment of components were investigated and compared with the results of the 3D and 2D evaluations. Results: According to the 3D evaluation, the difference between the pre-operative planning and actual postoperative sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal and sagittal alignments of the tibial component were 2.6° ± 1.8°, 2.2° ± 1.8° and 3.2° ± 2.4°, respectively. Using the 2D evaluation, they were 1.9° ± 1.5°, 1.3° ± 1.2° and 1.8° ± 1.4°, making the difference in 3D evaluation significantly higher (p = 0.013, = 0.003 and < 0.001). For the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component, the outlier ( > ± 3°) ratio for the 3D evaluation was also significantly higher than that of the 2D evaluation (p < 0.001, = 0.009 and < 0.001). Conclusions: The difference between the pre-operative planning and post-operative component alignment in the 3D evaluation is significantly higher than that of the 2D, even if the same cases have been evaluated. Twodimensional evaluation may mask or underestimate the post-operative implant malposition. Three-dimensional evaluation using the same co-ordinates’ system as for pre-operative planning is necessary to accurately evaluate the post-operative component position.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼