RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      홀랜드 진로집단상담 프로그램이 대학생의 진로성숙도 및 진로의사결정 자기효능감에 미치는 효과 = (The) effects that Holland's the course group consultation program influence the course career maturity and the course career decision-making self efficacy improvement of the college students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9853964

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Holland's the course group consultation program on the course career maturity and the course career decision-making self efficacy of the college students.
      To achieve this aim, the subjects were 24 drawn from C college university in Changwon city, who volunteered to participate in this program and they were assigned to the experimental and control groups. The former had an Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program applied while the latter were given no treatments.
      The investigator applied the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program to the experiment group total 8 sessions were provided and each session lasted for 240 minutes.
      This instrument used in this study was Career Maturity Inventory(CMI), and Career Decision Making Self-Efficacy Scale(CDMSES), each group was measured by pretest-posttest. the data were processed by SPSS program. The differences between the two groups were examined and the results were as follows:
      First, under the hypothesis that 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career maturity inventory before and after the program compared to the control group.' there were found significant differences in such all the sub-areas as decisiveness, involvement, independence, orientation, compromise.
      Second, the second hypothesis, 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career decision making Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the program compared to the control group.' there were found significant differences in such all the sub-areas as vocational information, create an objective, establish of plan, solution of problem and self-estimate.
      After examine both the hypotheses, 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career maturity inventory and career decision mating Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the program compared to the control group.' the following conclusions were drawn; the comparison between the experiment group and the control group confirmed the significant differences in all sub-areas.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Holland's the course group consultation program on the course career maturity and the course career decision-making self efficacy of the college students. To achieve this aim, the subjec...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Holland's the course group consultation program on the course career maturity and the course career decision-making self efficacy of the college students.
      To achieve this aim, the subjects were 24 drawn from C college university in Changwon city, who volunteered to participate in this program and they were assigned to the experimental and control groups. The former had an Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program applied while the latter were given no treatments.
      The investigator applied the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program to the experiment group total 8 sessions were provided and each session lasted for 240 minutes.
      This instrument used in this study was Career Maturity Inventory(CMI), and Career Decision Making Self-Efficacy Scale(CDMSES), each group was measured by pretest-posttest. the data were processed by SPSS program. The differences between the two groups were examined and the results were as follows:
      First, under the hypothesis that 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career maturity inventory before and after the program compared to the control group.' there were found significant differences in such all the sub-areas as decisiveness, involvement, independence, orientation, compromise.
      Second, the second hypothesis, 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career decision making Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the program compared to the control group.' there were found significant differences in such all the sub-areas as vocational information, create an objective, establish of plan, solution of problem and self-estimate.
      After examine both the hypotheses, 'The experiment group that used the Holland's the Course Group Consultation Program-using will have significant differences in their career maturity inventory and career decision mating Self-Efficacy Scale before and after the program compared to the control group.' the following conclusions were drawn; the comparison between the experiment group and the control group confirmed the significant differences in all sub-areas.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구가설 = 3
      • 3. 용어 정의 = 4
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구가설 = 3
      • 3. 용어 정의 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 진로성숙도 = 5
      • 2. 진로의사결정 자기효능감 = 7
      • 3. Holland 진로집단상담프로그램의 재구성 = 8
      • 4. 선행연구 = 19
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 23
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 23
      • 2. 연구 설계 = 23
      • 3. 연구 도구 = 24
      • 4. 실험 절차 = 28
      • 5. 자료처리 = 28
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 논의 = 30
      • 1. 동질성 검증 = 30
      • 2. 가설 검증의 결과 = 32
      • 3. 논의 = 42
      • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 46
      • 1. 요약 = 46
      • 2. 결론 = 47
      • [참고문헌] = 48
      • Abstract = 53
      • 부록 = 56
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼