RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    오피스빌딩市場의 標準體系 構築과 實行方案에 관한 硏究 : 서울시 오피스빌딩市場을 中心으로 = (A) Study on the formulation of standard system and its execution methods of officebuilding markets : Emphasis on officebuilding market of Seoul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9647450

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The object of this research is to formulate a standard system of domestic office building market that matches the global standard and to establish specific execution method of that system. In doing so, there are four key elements that need to be done. First of all, clear classification of office buildings in domestic real estate market is necessary. Secondly, class evaluation system needs to be formulated based on the office building classification system. Thirdly, the distinction between upper and lower end market within the whole office building market through more detailed classification is a must. Finally, the information system needs to be standardized in order to analyze the office building market with a certainty.
    After the foreign currency crisis in 1997, the domestic real estate market had gone through a very tough restructuring phases to overcome the economic crisis, and in this period, the importance of information, various indexes and indicators on the office building market finally come out on the surface. In addition, the introduction of real estate security and REITs as well as the new decision making methods of foreign investment companies as the market opened up to foreign capital all played a part that brought a rapid changes in the market environment, and this, in turn, resulted in an urgent need for a more accurate data on the office building statistics based market segmentation, market index and indicators related to the office building investment. However, the office markets statistical information and market trend reports that are currently published regretfully contain a definite problems related to the accuracy, trustworthiness and the level of quality, and they need to be upgraded. What used to be the closed market and its culture and the lack of standardized system of real estate market and office building information are to be blamed as the biggest reasons that cause such problems.
    This research, in dealing with such problems, after thorough investigation of the characteristics of domestic office building market with an emphasis on the market in Seoul, is structured in such way that covers both office buildings and office building market in order to formulate the sound standard system of domestic office buildings. Also, what can be done with the policy to accelerate the transition from a closed market structure to an open market structure is also discussed in a great deal. Firstly, case studies on office building market along with the general studies contributed to the theoretical basis of this research. Data base formulation through building ledger for the purpose of systematic classification of office buildings is discussed. A method that classifies a building over 3 stories high with a major use of office space as an office building is proposed as well. In addition, practical execution of class evaluation method based on dual structure is proposed for the purpose of effective office building class evaluation. To build a standard system in the office building market, the office buildings in Seoul are categorized in the following way; 4 mega markets, 21 sub-markets and 244 mass-transit station markets. Finally, the upgrade of rental payment system, office building evaluation methods and market research methods are covered in great deal as executive tactics in the formulation of information system in the office building market.
    In conclusion, the methods, proposed in this research paper, to formulate a standard system is aimed at fixing the structural problems associated with office building market that, at the end of the day, will provide a system thats acceptable in global standard.
    번역하기

    The object of this research is to formulate a standard system of domestic office building market that matches the global standard and to establish specific execution method of that system. In doing so, there are four key elements that need to be done....

    The object of this research is to formulate a standard system of domestic office building market that matches the global standard and to establish specific execution method of that system. In doing so, there are four key elements that need to be done. First of all, clear classification of office buildings in domestic real estate market is necessary. Secondly, class evaluation system needs to be formulated based on the office building classification system. Thirdly, the distinction between upper and lower end market within the whole office building market through more detailed classification is a must. Finally, the information system needs to be standardized in order to analyze the office building market with a certainty.
    After the foreign currency crisis in 1997, the domestic real estate market had gone through a very tough restructuring phases to overcome the economic crisis, and in this period, the importance of information, various indexes and indicators on the office building market finally come out on the surface. In addition, the introduction of real estate security and REITs as well as the new decision making methods of foreign investment companies as the market opened up to foreign capital all played a part that brought a rapid changes in the market environment, and this, in turn, resulted in an urgent need for a more accurate data on the office building statistics based market segmentation, market index and indicators related to the office building investment. However, the office markets statistical information and market trend reports that are currently published regretfully contain a definite problems related to the accuracy, trustworthiness and the level of quality, and they need to be upgraded. What used to be the closed market and its culture and the lack of standardized system of real estate market and office building information are to be blamed as the biggest reasons that cause such problems.
    This research, in dealing with such problems, after thorough investigation of the characteristics of domestic office building market with an emphasis on the market in Seoul, is structured in such way that covers both office buildings and office building market in order to formulate the sound standard system of domestic office buildings. Also, what can be done with the policy to accelerate the transition from a closed market structure to an open market structure is also discussed in a great deal. Firstly, case studies on office building market along with the general studies contributed to the theoretical basis of this research. Data base formulation through building ledger for the purpose of systematic classification of office buildings is discussed. A method that classifies a building over 3 stories high with a major use of office space as an office building is proposed as well. In addition, practical execution of class evaluation method based on dual structure is proposed for the purpose of effective office building class evaluation. To build a standard system in the office building market, the office buildings in Seoul are categorized in the following way; 4 mega markets, 21 sub-markets and 244 mass-transit station markets. Finally, the upgrade of rental payment system, office building evaluation methods and market research methods are covered in great deal as executive tactics in the formulation of information system in the office building market.
    In conclusion, the methods, proposed in this research paper, to formulate a standard system is aimed at fixing the structural problems associated with office building market that, at the end of the day, will provide a system thats acceptable in global standard.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 2
    • 제2장 오피스빌딩시장에 관한 일반적 고찰 = 4
    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 2
    • 제2장 오피스빌딩시장에 관한 일반적 고찰 = 4
    • 제1절 시장환경 인식 = 4
    • 1. 부동산 시장환경의 변화 = 4
    • 2. 오피스빌딩 시장환경의 변화 = 5
    • 제2절 오피스빌딩 시장 개요 = 8
    • 1. 오피스빌딩 시장에 관한 선행연구 = 8
    • 2. 오피스빌딩시장의 정의 = 10
    • 3. 오피스(Office)의 기능과 입지 = 12
    • 제3절 서울시 오피스빌딩 시장의 특성 분석 = 15
    • 1. 서울시 오피스빌딩 분포 현황 = 15
    • 2. 서울시 오피스빌딩 임대시장 동향 분석 = 19
    • 3. 서울시 오피스빌딩 매매시장 동향 분석 = 28
    • 제4절 오피스빌딩 매각가치의 평가 = 32
    • 1. 오피스빌딩 주요정보 = 32
    • 2. 오피스빌딩 가치평가방식 = 39
    • 3. 오피스빌딩 매각 가치평가 사례 연구 = 42
    • 제5절 외국의 오피스빌딩시장 사례 연구 = 50
    • 1. 일본 = 50
    • 2. 미국 = 52
    • 3. 홍콩 = 53
    • 4. 시사점 = 54
    • 제3장. 오피스빌딩 표준체계 구축방안 = 56
    • 제1절. 오피스빌딩 표준체계 구축의 목적 및 기본방향 = 56
    • 제2절 오피스빌딩 분류체계 = 57
    • 1. 일반적인 오피스빌딩 분류방안과 문제점 = 57
    • 2. 오피스빌딩 분류 표준안의 수립 = 60
    • 3. 오피스빌딩 데이터베이스(Database) 구축 = 61
    • 4. 오피스빌딩 데이터베이스(Database)의 정보업데이트 실행 = 64
    • 제3절. 오피스빌딩 등급평가체계 = 66
    • 1. 등급평가체계 구축의 개요 = 66
    • 2. 오피스빌딩 등급분류체계 = 71
    • 3. 오피스빌딩등급의 평가항목의 선정과 평가기준 및 평가방법 = 73
    • 4. 오피스빌딩 등급제도 시행방안 = 75
    • 제4장 오피스빌딩시장 표준체계 구축방안 = 80
    • 제1절. 오피스빌딩시장 표준체계 구축의 목적 및 기본방향 = 80
    • 제2절 오피스빌딩시장 분류체계 = 82
    • 1. 하부시장 분류체계의 개요 = 82
    • 2. 도심권역의 하부시장 분류체계 = 84
    • 3. 여의도권역의 하부시장 분류체계 = 88
    • 4. 강남권역의 하부시장 분류체계 = 90
    • 5. 기타권역의 하부시장 분류체계 = 94
    • 제3절. 오피스빌딩시장 정보체계 구축 = 95
    • 1. 정보체계 구축의 개요 = 95
    • 2. 오피스빌딩시장 정보기준 표준화를 위한 개선방안 = 98
    • 3. 오피스빌딩시장 정보조사시스템 구축방안 = 108
    • 제5장. 요약·결론 및 향후 과제 = 117
    • 제1절 연구의 요약 및 결론 = 117
    • 제2절 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제 = 119
    • 참고문헌 = 121
    • ABSTRACT = 125
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼