RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      국어과 읽기 평가에서의 피드백 효과 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9162492

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 고려대학교 교육대학원, 2003

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 고려대학교 교육대학원 , 국어교육전공 , 2004. 2

      • 발행연도

        2003

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        374.441 판사항(4)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        196p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 124-126

      • 소장기관
        • 고려대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 고려대학교 세종학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research is to examine the effect of feedback presentation strategy on the accomplishment of learning reading and the learning attitude in the domain of language reading assessment. Especially, this research is to realize the application of feedback presentation strategy and the instruction model through questions to instructors and students in school.
      Until now, most of researches about feedback have just analyzed the effect of feedback presentation type of feedback presentation time, and the research about feedback presentation methods considering students' distinctive quality has not been done analytically and systematically. Moreover, a field experiment regarding the effect of feedback in language reading assessment has hardly been done.
      Feedback which enables students to criticize and analyze their thinking process about reading can be led for students to think over their own reading activities and can be given for teachers to get information regarding students' linguistic ability and teaching instruction. And feedback may eventually give important suggestion to language reading pratice and may give substantial help to students in school that prepare the national academic aptitude test.
      In this research, 'explicative feedback' model in reading domain was developed synthesizing the theory of feedback, the questions about feedback in school, the analysis of reading material type in national academic aptitude test and the strategy of problem solving.
      For the purpose of examining the accomplishment in reading and the effect in learning the accomplishment in reading and the effect in learning aptitude, experiment and research were done and analyzed to groups provided with the error correction feedback and to groups provided with explicative feedback referred previously.
      According to analysis about accomplishment of learning, the type of feedback doesn't have meaningful effect on the higher rank groups while it has meaningful on the lower rank groups. For the lower rank groups, the explicative feedback model rather than the error correction feedback has positive effect in accomplishment of learning.
      As a result of analyzing learning attitude, explicative feedback model has effect in improving learning attitude such as confidence, accomplishment motivation and the application of learning skill. and it was examined whether there were meaningful differences according to the level of learning attitude out of groups provided with explicative feedback model. According to the results, there were meaningful differences in interest, accomplishment motivation, self-regulation study and application of learning skill between the higher rank groups and the lower rank groups.
      As a results, explicative feedback model has positive effect on the lower rank groups rather than the higher rank groups regarding the accomplishment of learning and attitude in language reading assessment. That is, various types of feedback models should be needed that can help design feedback types effectively analyzing the errors of students in various levels. Also, the development of applicable class model in school should be needed for a systematic research regarding students' error types and certification of strength and weakness of this explicative feedback model.
      번역하기

      This research is to examine the effect of feedback presentation strategy on the accomplishment of learning reading and the learning attitude in the domain of language reading assessment. Especially, this research is to realize the application of feedb...

      This research is to examine the effect of feedback presentation strategy on the accomplishment of learning reading and the learning attitude in the domain of language reading assessment. Especially, this research is to realize the application of feedback presentation strategy and the instruction model through questions to instructors and students in school.
      Until now, most of researches about feedback have just analyzed the effect of feedback presentation type of feedback presentation time, and the research about feedback presentation methods considering students' distinctive quality has not been done analytically and systematically. Moreover, a field experiment regarding the effect of feedback in language reading assessment has hardly been done.
      Feedback which enables students to criticize and analyze their thinking process about reading can be led for students to think over their own reading activities and can be given for teachers to get information regarding students' linguistic ability and teaching instruction. And feedback may eventually give important suggestion to language reading pratice and may give substantial help to students in school that prepare the national academic aptitude test.
      In this research, 'explicative feedback' model in reading domain was developed synthesizing the theory of feedback, the questions about feedback in school, the analysis of reading material type in national academic aptitude test and the strategy of problem solving.
      For the purpose of examining the accomplishment in reading and the effect in learning the accomplishment in reading and the effect in learning aptitude, experiment and research were done and analyzed to groups provided with the error correction feedback and to groups provided with explicative feedback referred previously.
      According to analysis about accomplishment of learning, the type of feedback doesn't have meaningful effect on the higher rank groups while it has meaningful on the lower rank groups. For the lower rank groups, the explicative feedback model rather than the error correction feedback has positive effect in accomplishment of learning.
      As a result of analyzing learning attitude, explicative feedback model has effect in improving learning attitude such as confidence, accomplishment motivation and the application of learning skill. and it was examined whether there were meaningful differences according to the level of learning attitude out of groups provided with explicative feedback model. According to the results, there were meaningful differences in interest, accomplishment motivation, self-regulation study and application of learning skill between the higher rank groups and the lower rank groups.
      As a results, explicative feedback model has positive effect on the lower rank groups rather than the higher rank groups regarding the accomplishment of learning and attitude in language reading assessment. That is, various types of feedback models should be needed that can help design feedback types effectively analyzing the errors of students in various levels. Also, the development of applicable class model in school should be needed for a systematic research regarding students' error types and certification of strength and weakness of this explicative feedback model.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • C. 연구의 제한점 = 4
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구의 목적 = 3
      • C. 연구의 제한점 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 피드백에 관한 이론 = 5
      • A. 피드백의 개념 = 5
      • B. 피드백의 유형 = 7
      • 1. Colo과 Chan의 분류 = 7
      • (1) 긍정적 피드백과 부정적 피드백 = 7
      • (2) 강화와 벌 = 8
      • (3) 의도적 피드백과 무의도적 피드백 = 8
      • (4) 평가적 피드백과 비평가적 피드백 = 8
      • (5) 언어적·상징적 피드백과, 비언어적 피드백 = 9
      • (6) 교정적 피드백 = 9
      • 2. Smith의 분류 = 9
      • (1) 동기적 강화 피드백 = 9
      • (2) 정보적 교정 피드백 = 10
      • 3. Shimmel의 분류 = 10
      • (1) 정·오 확인 피드백 = 10
      • (2) 정답반응 피드백 = 10
      • (3) 오류관련 피드백 = 10
      • (4) 설명적 피드백 = 11
      • 4. 백영균의 분류 = 11
      • (1) 확인적 피드백 = 11
      • (2) 교육적 피드백 = 11
      • (3) 동기적 피드백 = 11
      • C. 피드백의 효과 = 13
      • 1. 국외 선행 연구 고찰 = 12
      • 2. 국내 선행 연구 = 17
      • (1) 피드백의 제공시기에 관한 연구 = 17
      • (2) 피드백의 정보량에 관한 연구 = 19
      • (3) 피드백의 제공자에 대한 연구 = 20
      • (4) 피드백의 제공방법에 관한 연구 = 21
      • Ⅲ. 읽기 영역 평가의 피드백 실태 조사 = 24
      • A. 읽기 영역 평가의 피드백 실태 = 24
      • 1. 조사 대상 = 24
      • 2. 측정 도구 = 25
      • 3. 자료의 처리 = 26
      • B. 읽기 영역 평가에서 피드백 실태의 문제점 분석 = 27
      • 1. 문제점 분석 결과 = 27
      • (1) 피드백 사용 여부 = 27
      • (2) 적절한 피드백 제공시기와 제공자 = 30
      • (3) 피드백 유형과 효과 = 33
      • (4) 적절한 피드백 유형 = 36
      • (5) 피드백 자료와 제공 범위, 문제유형 = 39
      • (6) 교사와 학생의 피드백에 대한 장점이나 단점, 개선해야 할 점 = 44
      • Ⅳ. 읽기 평가 피드백 전략 모형 개발 = 46
      • A. 읽기 평가에서의 문제 해결 방법 = 46
      • 1. 지문파악 = 47
      • (1) 인문 분야 지문 = 48
      • (2) 사회 분야 지문 = 50
      • (3) 과학 분야 지문 = 52
      • (4) 예술 분야 지문 = 53
      • (5) 언어 분야 지문 = 55
      • B. 효과적인 피드백 제시 방법 = 83
      • C. 읽기 평가의 설명식 피드백 수업 모형 설계 = 85
      • Ⅴ. 연구 방법과 절차 = 89
      • A. 연구 가설 = 89
      • B. 연구 대상 = 90
      • C. 측정 도구 = 92
      • 1. 사전·사후 검사 = 92
      • (1) 읽기 영역 학업성취도 검사 = 92
      • (2) 읽기 영역 학습태도검사 = 94
      • 2. 형성 평가지 = 95
      • 3. 피드백 유형 = 96
      • (1) 정·오 확인 피드백 = 96
      • (2) 설명식 모형 피드백 = 97
      • D. 실험 설계 = 97
      • E. 실험 절차 = 98
      • 1. 피드백 수업 모형 제작을 위한 피드백 실태 설문 조사 = 99
      • 2. 피드백 수업 모형 제작 = 99
      • 3. 연구대상의 선정 및 실험집단 구성 = 99
      • 4. 사전검사 실시 = 99
      • (1) 학업 성취도 검사 = 99
      • (2) 학습 태도 검사 = 100
      • 5. 실험 처치 = 100
      • (1) 정·오 확인 피드백 = 101
      • (2) 설명식 모형 피드백 = 101
      • 6. 사후 검사 = 102
      • (1) 학업 성취도 검사 = 102
      • (2) 학습 태도 검사 = 102
      • F. 자료 처리 = 103
      • Ⅵ. 결과 및 해석 = 104
      • A. 결과 = 104
      • 1. 학업 성취도에 미치는 효과 분석 = 104
      • (1) 두 집단 전체 학업 성취도 검사 결과 = 104
      • 1) 상위집단 비교 = 105
      • 2) 하위집단 비교 = 106
      • (2) 사전 성취도 수준에 따른 사후 집단 간 학업 성취도 변화 = 107
      • 2. 학습 태도에 미치는 효과 분석 = 110
      • 3. 설명식 모형 피드백 수업에 대한 설문 조사 분석 = 114
      • B. 해석 = 118
      • 1. 학업 성취도에 미치는 효과 해석 = 118
      • 2. 학습 태도에 미치는 효과 해석 = 119
      • Ⅶ. 결론 = 121
      • A. 요약 = 121
      • B. 제언 = 122
      • <참고문헌> = 124
      • [Abstract] = 127
      • 부록1 교사용 설문지 = 129
      • 부록2 학생용 설문지 I = 133
      • 부록3 학업성취도 사전 검사지 = 137
      • 부록4 학업성취도 사후 검사지 = 150
      • 부록5 읽기 영역 학습태도 검사지 = 164
      • 부록6 형성평가지 예시 - 인문 = 169
      • 부록7 형성평가지 예시 - 사회 = 176
      • 부록8 형성평가지 예시 - 과학 = 183
      • 부록9 형성평가지 예시 - 예술 = 190
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼