RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    企業價値評價 方法論과 適用事例에 관한 硏究 = (A) Study on the Methodology of Evaluating Company and its Case Applied in Practice

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8998548

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, theoretical backgrounds of various valuation methods, including basic concepts and the limitations, were examined and a new approach for Korea telecommunications industry was suggested. The approach utilizes the information of subscriber head count in addition to the net asset to determine the value of a company. A case study of a local company "P" showed that the approach provided agreeable valuation result the current stock price.
    The contents and scope of this paper are as follows :
    -review various methods of firm valuation.
    -apply each valuation approach to the local company "P.
    -identify suitable methods that successfully value telecommunication firms for stock market.
    In summary, the case study indicated that Discounted Cash Flow method is one of the most appropriate models, while Net Asset Value method models tend to undervalue the stock price of company particularly during the period of economic crisis. The study also showed that comparable company analysis is very useful to estimate the value of an "P" company; however, no any single valuation method is universally applicable to all cases for appraisal.
    The company evaluation mixed with human resources and material ones systematically has various evaluation methods according to the conditions and the purpose. There is no one method to product a fixed unique value under the all conditions among the several company evaluation methods. There are differences between company evaluation method and firm's value according to the condition and the purpose. But, the interested parties can accept the validity of the method applied in the evaluation at least, about the results.
    This paper contributes the validity and the usefulness of evaluating company with a theoretical and practical approach. So this paper analyses the previous theoris about the methodology of avaluating company and describes the cases applied with the methods in practice.
    번역하기

    In this study, theoretical backgrounds of various valuation methods, including basic concepts and the limitations, were examined and a new approach for Korea telecommunications industry was suggested. The approach utilizes the information of subscribe...

    In this study, theoretical backgrounds of various valuation methods, including basic concepts and the limitations, were examined and a new approach for Korea telecommunications industry was suggested. The approach utilizes the information of subscriber head count in addition to the net asset to determine the value of a company. A case study of a local company "P" showed that the approach provided agreeable valuation result the current stock price.
    The contents and scope of this paper are as follows :
    -review various methods of firm valuation.
    -apply each valuation approach to the local company "P.
    -identify suitable methods that successfully value telecommunication firms for stock market.
    In summary, the case study indicated that Discounted Cash Flow method is one of the most appropriate models, while Net Asset Value method models tend to undervalue the stock price of company particularly during the period of economic crisis. The study also showed that comparable company analysis is very useful to estimate the value of an "P" company; however, no any single valuation method is universally applicable to all cases for appraisal.
    The company evaluation mixed with human resources and material ones systematically has various evaluation methods according to the conditions and the purpose. There is no one method to product a fixed unique value under the all conditions among the several company evaluation methods. There are differences between company evaluation method and firm's value according to the condition and the purpose. But, the interested parties can accept the validity of the method applied in the evaluation at least, about the results.
    This paper contributes the validity and the usefulness of evaluating company with a theoretical and practical approach. So this paper analyses the previous theoris about the methodology of avaluating company and describes the cases applied with the methods in practice.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = i
    • 표목차 = iv
    • 그림목차 = v
    • ABSTRACT = vi
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 목차 = i
    • 표목차 = iv
    • 그림목차 = v
    • ABSTRACT = vi
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 = 2
    • 제2장 기업가치평가의 개념과 기업가치 기준 = 4
    • 제1절 기업가치평가의 개념 및 대상 = 4
    • 제2절 기업가치평가의 목적 = 5
    • 제3절 기업가치평가의 원리와 가정에 따른 기업가치 기준의 구분 = 6
    • 1. 공정시장가치 (Fair Market Value) = 7
    • 2. 투자가치 (Investment Value) = 8
    • 3. 내재가치 (Intrinsic of Fundamental Value) = 8
    • 4. 공정가치 (Fair Value) = 8
    • 5. 청산가치 (Liguidation Value) = 8
    • 제3장 기업가치평가의 접근방법 = 10
    • 제1절 이익접근법 = 10
    • 1. 개요 = 10
    • 1) 이익접근법의 개념 및 장단점 = 10
    • 2) 경제적 이익과 할인율 = 11
    • 3) 전체기업평가방법의 우수성 = 11
    • 2. 현금흐름할인법 = 12
    • 1) 현금흐름할인법의 장점 = 12
    • 2) 가치창출요소 = 14
    • 3) 투하자산에 대한 가치평가 = 15
    • 4) 현금흐름할인법(DCF)의 기본개념 = 16
    • 4) 수익가치의 추정절차 = 18
    • 3. 배당할인분석법 (Dividend discount analysis) = 24
    • 1) 배당할인분석법(Dividend discount analysis)의 개념 = 24
    • 2) 배당금의 추정 = 24
    • 3) 배당할인분석법의 한계 = 26
    • 4. EVA모형 = 26
    • 5. Edward-Bell-Ohlson 모형 (EBO모형) = 27
    • 제2절 시장접근법 (Market Approach) = 30
    • 1. 비교가능기업 분석법 (Comparable company Analysis) = 31
    • 1) 비교가능기업 분석법의 개념 = 31
    • 2) 가치평가 비율법의 종류 = 35
    • 2. 비교가능거래 분석법 (Comparable transactions analysis) = 37
    • 1) 비교가능거래 분석법(Comparable transactions analysis)의 개념 = 37
    • 2) 비교가능거래 분석법(Comparable transactions analysis)의 평가 절차 = 37
    • 3) 비교가능기업 분석법과의 비교 = 39
    • 4) 비교가능거래 분석법(Comparable transactions analysis)의 한계 = 40
    • 제3절 자산기준 접근법 (Asset-Based Approach) = 40
    • 1. 자산기준 접근법의 개요 = 40
    • 2. 순자산가치법 (net asset value method) = 42
    • 1) 개별자산 평가방법 (individual asset valuation method) = 42
    • 2) 집합자산 평가방법 (collective asset valuation method) = 44
    • 3) 순자산가치법(net asset value method)의 이점과 한계 = 46
    • 3. 대체가치법 (replacement value method) = 46
    • 4. 청산가치법 (liquidation value method) = 46
    • 제4절 세 가지 접근법의 비교 = 47
    • 제4장 기업가치평가방법론의 적용사례 = 48
    • 제1절 평가범위 및 평가기준 = 48
    • 제2절 회사개요 = 50
    • 제3절 자산가치 평가내역 = 53
    • 제4절 수익가치 평가내역 = 54
    • 제5절 기업가치 평가결과 요약 및 평가 = 65
    • 제5장 결론 = 67
    • 제1절 요약 및 시사점 = 67
    • 제2절 의의와 향후 연구방향 = 68
    • Reference = 70
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼