고등학생의 학습양식과 학업성취와의 관계분석 = Relationships between High School Students' Learning Style and Learning Achievements

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between high school students' leaning style and learning achievements.
Leaning style questionnaires, which was revised by the researcher of this study, was used to identify students' leaning styles, wholist-verbal, wholist-imagery, analytic-verbal, and analytic-imagery. Subjects were 250 high school students (121 males and 129 females) in rural area,
Major findings of this study were as follows:
The learning achievements of students with wholist-imagery and analytic-imagery learning style in social division and language division were higher than those in the scientific division and arts-athletic division. But, there was no relationship between learning achievements and learning styles in the science and arts-athletic division.
It was found that learning achievements based on learning style were not related with gender. Effects of interaction by learning styles and gender are found in the language division only. Leaning effects in gender were not found in other divisions such as social, science, and arts-athletic division.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• A. 연구의 필요성과 연구목적 = 1
• B. 연구문제 = 2
• C. 연구의 제한점 = 3
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4
• A. 학습양식의 개념 = 4
• B. 인지양식/학습양식에 대한 문헌적 고찰 = 9
• 1. 인지중심 접근 (The Cognition - Centered Approach) = 9
• a) 반성적 - 충동적 (Reflection - Impulsivty) = 9
• b) 장의 존적 - 장독립적 (Field Dependence - Independence) = 11
• 2. 인성중심 접근 (The Personality - Centered Approach) = 11
• a) Jung(1923)의 유형이론 (The Theory Of Types) = 12
• b) Gregorc(1985)의 활동적 모형 (Energic Model) = 13
• 3. 활동중심 접근 (The Activity - Centered Approach) = 14
• a) 학습양식 (learning styles) = 14
• b) 수업(교수)양식 (teaching styles) = 15
• 4. Riding & Douglas(1993)의 인지양식 = 16
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 18
• A. 연구대상 = 18
• B. 측정 도구 = 18
• 1. 인지양식의 언어적 도형적 차원 = 18
• 2. 인지양식의 전체적 분석적 차원 = 19
• C. 자료처리 = 19
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 20
• Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 27
• A. 요약 및 논의 = 27
• B. 결론 및 제언 = 29
• 참고문헌 = 31