RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    정신분열 정신장애인에 대한 정신사회재활훈련 효과성의 메타분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8945276

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, the concept of "treatment" have changed from removing symptoms to returning society. At this environment, the purpose of treatment becomes returning society. To make this work, various psycho-social rehabilitation programs have developed, operated and researched.
    Although number of studies increasing, these studies just explain if the effect exist or not. However these studies can't explain what, how, which effect exist. Therefore this study will meta-analysis psycho-social rehabilitation programs by few variables to offer more proper programs to metal disorder patients.
    At this study, the subject were 45 studies and picked out 103 effect sizes. Variables were period , kinds, of programs and scales which evaluate program. However, patients' history which is thought critical variables can't be choose for a variable because of subject studies didn't mention well.
    As a result, total effect size is 1.04 that means psycho-social programs very effective. But this size have risk of overestimate because of most subject studies were thesis.
    The first variable, period of programs, show the longer program make low effect size. Although this result, the implication of the result not the long program isn't good but proper combination with other variables is more important.
    Second variable is kinds of programs. Daily living skill's effect size was the biggest next is medicine·symptom control programs, social skill training, job rehabilitation program. At this point, the point that daily living skill have the biggest effect size could mean patients feels helpful most when they solve daily skill. And the point that job rehabilitation program's effect size is smallest, we should think about this. It can be matter of contents of program or matter of scale.
    Third variable is scales. In case of category, scales which evaluate psychiatric symptom show the biggest effect size. Not categories but a poiunt of view individual scales, daily living skill scale showed the biggest effect size.
    In addition of this result, this study analysis period and scales by every programs kinds. It will offer more precise information that each programs have what kind of a variation by period and scales.
    I hope that meta-analysis including unpublication studies and patient's history for a variable. These will make research more precise and suitable.
    번역하기

    Recently, the concept of "treatment" have changed from removing symptoms to returning society. At this environment, the purpose of treatment becomes returning society. To make this work, various psycho-social rehabilitation programs have developed, op...

    Recently, the concept of "treatment" have changed from removing symptoms to returning society. At this environment, the purpose of treatment becomes returning society. To make this work, various psycho-social rehabilitation programs have developed, operated and researched.
    Although number of studies increasing, these studies just explain if the effect exist or not. However these studies can't explain what, how, which effect exist. Therefore this study will meta-analysis psycho-social rehabilitation programs by few variables to offer more proper programs to metal disorder patients.
    At this study, the subject were 45 studies and picked out 103 effect sizes. Variables were period , kinds, of programs and scales which evaluate program. However, patients' history which is thought critical variables can't be choose for a variable because of subject studies didn't mention well.
    As a result, total effect size is 1.04 that means psycho-social programs very effective. But this size have risk of overestimate because of most subject studies were thesis.
    The first variable, period of programs, show the longer program make low effect size. Although this result, the implication of the result not the long program isn't good but proper combination with other variables is more important.
    Second variable is kinds of programs. Daily living skill's effect size was the biggest next is medicine·symptom control programs, social skill training, job rehabilitation program. At this point, the point that daily living skill have the biggest effect size could mean patients feels helpful most when they solve daily skill. And the point that job rehabilitation program's effect size is smallest, we should think about this. It can be matter of contents of program or matter of scale.
    Third variable is scales. In case of category, scales which evaluate psychiatric symptom show the biggest effect size. Not categories but a poiunt of view individual scales, daily living skill scale showed the biggest effect size.
    In addition of this result, this study analysis period and scales by every programs kinds. It will offer more precise information that each programs have what kind of a variation by period and scales.
    I hope that meta-analysis including unpublication studies and patient's history for a variable. These will make research more precise and suitable.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 제 1 절 문제제기 = 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 = 5
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 목차
    • 제 1 장 서론 = 1
    • 제 1 절 문제제기 = 1
    • 제 2 절 연구목적 = 5
    • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 제 1 절 정신분열병의 개념 및 특징 = 7
    • 제 2 절 정신사회재활의 개념 및 내용 = 9
    • 제 3 절 메타분석 = 18
    • 제 3 장 선행연구 = 32
    • 제 1 절 효과성 연구 = 32
    • 제 2 절 효과성 연구의 통합 = 35
    • 제 4 장 연구방법 = 38
    • 제 1 절 연구절차 = 38
    • 제 2 절 연구문제 = 40
    • 제 3 절 연구의 제한점 = 41
    • 제 4 절 주요개념의 조작적 정의 = 42
    • 제 5 장 연구결과 분석 = 44
    • 제 1 절 분석대상 연구물의 일반적 특성 = 44
    • 제 2 절 개별 연구물의 특징 및 효과크기 = 49
    • 제 3 절 연구결과 및 해석 = 57
    • 제 6 장 결론 및 제언 = 72
    • 참고문헌 = 77
    • ABSTRACT = 82
    • <부록 1> = 85
    • <부록 2> = 86
    • <부록 3> = 90
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼