The purpose of this study was to try to identify sex role identity types related with children's distribution justice judgement by reviewing the relationship between sex role identity and distribution. justice judgement.
The subjects were 120 childre...
The purpose of this study was to try to identify sex role identity types related with children's distribution justice judgement by reviewing the relationship between sex role identity and distribution. justice judgement.
The subjects were 120 children who were 4 or 5 years old attending at 9 Nursery Schools located in Y-city and comprised homogeneous group in consideration of their parent's absence, education degree and economic status in order to control environmental variables.
Experimental instrument was Korean Sex Role Inventory for Preschool Children', KSRI PSC, Kim, Young-hee, 1994) to measure sex role identity and Kim, Jong-joon's Tool which was modified to adjust to our country's culture and children's standard from Distribution Justice Judgement Test Tools among Demon's Social Moral Interviews for Young Children in order to measure the judgement.
The collected data were examined by using one-way ANOVA to analyze sex role types and distribution judgement, and the differences between their ages and distribution justice judgement. And also two-way ANOVA was used to examine the differences between ages and the judgement according to their sex role identity.
The results of the above study were as follows ;
First, as a result of examining the differences of the judgement according to the children's sex role identity types, bisexuality showed more distributive than femininity and undifferentiated group. In the distribution justice judgement, bisexuality had no significant differences compared with masculinity, so bisexuality proved not to be the major factor in elucidating the distribution justice judgement. But, the relation between bisexuality and masculinity and non-differentiated group showed a significant difference, so the relationship between bisexuality and distribution justice judgement could be existed. Thus, it was possible to admit that each individual who had a desirable femininity and masculinity made a better decision on distribution.
Second, the difference between ages, 4 year old child stayed 0-B level in Damon's Distribution Level and 5 year old child belonged to l-A level, In sex role stagnation types, the difference between 4 and 5 year old child was not remarkable.
Third, the level of fair decision had no difference according to the child's age and sex role stagnant types.