협력 학습을 통한 인지적 언어중재가 실어증자들의 언어능력과 의사소통 기능에 미치는 영향 = (The)effects of group therapy using a cooperative and cognitive intervention program in aphasics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Second, 2 aphasics consisted 1 group and they cooperated to perform a task.
Third, 3 groups with 2 aphasics in a group competed one another in a task where the 2 aphasics had to cooperated.
Finally, the investigator gave the feedback to the group and she and the subjects discussed the overall procedures of the therapy. The above mentioned 6 tests were administered prc- and post-treatment and the 4 dcpcndcnt variables were mcasurcd. A repeated two-way ANOVA was performed for analysis.
The results were as follows;
First, the group therapy was more effective in improving overall language performance as compared to the individual therapy.
Second, the group therapy was more effective in enhancing cognitive ability in comprehending language as compared to the individual therapy.
Third, the group therapy was more effective in increasing functional communication skills as compared to the individual therapy.
Finally, there was no significant difference between the group and individual therapy in naming ability.
Generally, there was no significant difference in the improvement of fluent and non-fluent aphasics. Therefore, it could be said that the group therapy using the cooperative and cognitive language intervention program appcarcd to be effective regardless of the type and severity of aphasia.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• I. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
• 2. 연구의 문제 = 4
• II. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 실어증 치료 = 6
• 2. 인지적 언어 재활 = 9
• 3. 실어증 그룹치료 = 17
• 4. 연구의 필요성 = 25
• III. 연구방법 = 29
• 1. 연구 대상 = 29
• 2. 평가 도구 = 32
• 3. 실험 설계 = 33
• 4. 연구절차 = 34
• 5. 자료 처리 = 45
• IV. 결과 및 해석 = 46
• 1. 전반적 언어능력 = 46
• 2. 언어적 의미인지 능력 = 51
• 3. 기능적 의사소통 능력 = 55
• 4. 자발적 어휘연상 능력 = 58
• V. 고찰 = 64
• 1. 방법에 관한 고찰 = 64
• 2. 결과에 관한 고찰 = 68
• VI. 결론 및 제언 = 75
• 1. 결론 = 75
• 2. 제언 = 77
• 참고문헌 = 79
• Abstract = 90
• <부록1> 인지적 언어 중재 프로그램 = 92
• <부록2> 언어적 의미인지 능력 평가 = 102
• <부록3> 의미 연상과제를 통한 어휘 명명하기 평가 = 125
• <부록4> 기능적 의사소통 능력 평가 = 132
• <부록5> 실어증 심한 정도 척도 = 135
• <부록6> 범주별 어휘 목록 = 136