RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      형제 개입의 기능적 언어중재가 언어장애 아동의 언어능력에 미치는 효과 = (The)effects of a sibling-involved funtional language intervention in children with language disorders

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8934090

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was aimed at clarifying the effects of sibling involvement in a functioanl language intervention concerning semantic, morphological, and pragmatic aspects of language and overall language abilities in children with language disorders.
      Ten subjects were selected and assigned into two groups (functional language intervention group with sibilng involvement, and functional language intervention without sibiling involvement. Group 1 (n=10) consists of 5 children with language disorders. Group 2 consists of 5 children with language disorders without sibiling involvement. To investigate the language and communication ability, four examanation tools were administered: Preschool Language Scale, Picture Vocabulary Test, Sentence Comprehension Test, and Language Comprehension and Congnition Test. The subjects's spontaneous speech sample were analyzed. To compare pre-treatment with post-treatment between two the groups, repeated-measures ANOVA and t-test were used. In the language intervention, acrivirties consisted of group time, playing riddles time.
      The results were as follows;
      First, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effevtive compared to without sibling involvement in improning the semantic aspects of language of children with langauge disorders. There was no significant differnce between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the Type-Token Ratio of two the groups. However, there was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the number of semantic relations between the two groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2.
      Second, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective compared to language of children with language disorders. There was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the mean length of utterance(MLU) of the two groups.However there was no significant difference between in the post-treatment between the groups.
      Third, tje functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective in improving pragmatic aspects of language of children with language disorders. There was a signigicant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the number of communicative intentions of the two groups. And there was a sigvificant difference in the post-treatment betwenn the groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2.
      Forth, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective compared to without sibling involvement in improving the overall language abilities of children with language disorder. There was a signigicant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the overall language abilities of the two groups. However, there was no signigicant difference in the post-treatment between the two groups. Therefore, language sample analyses seemed to be more sensitive than language tests to identify overall language sbilities in children with language disorders.
      As described above, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was effective in improving the language abilitied of children with language disorders.

      번역하기

      This study was aimed at clarifying the effects of sibling involvement in a functioanl language intervention concerning semantic, morphological, and pragmatic aspects of language and overall language abilities in children with language disorders. Ten ...

      This study was aimed at clarifying the effects of sibling involvement in a functioanl language intervention concerning semantic, morphological, and pragmatic aspects of language and overall language abilities in children with language disorders.
      Ten subjects were selected and assigned into two groups (functional language intervention group with sibilng involvement, and functional language intervention without sibiling involvement. Group 1 (n=10) consists of 5 children with language disorders. Group 2 consists of 5 children with language disorders without sibiling involvement. To investigate the language and communication ability, four examanation tools were administered: Preschool Language Scale, Picture Vocabulary Test, Sentence Comprehension Test, and Language Comprehension and Congnition Test. The subjects's spontaneous speech sample were analyzed. To compare pre-treatment with post-treatment between two the groups, repeated-measures ANOVA and t-test were used. In the language intervention, acrivirties consisted of group time, playing riddles time.
      The results were as follows;
      First, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effevtive compared to without sibling involvement in improning the semantic aspects of language of children with langauge disorders. There was no significant differnce between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the Type-Token Ratio of two the groups. However, there was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the number of semantic relations between the two groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2.
      Second, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective compared to language of children with language disorders. There was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the mean length of utterance(MLU) of the two groups.However there was no significant difference between in the post-treatment between the groups.
      Third, tje functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective in improving pragmatic aspects of language of children with language disorders. There was a signigicant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the number of communicative intentions of the two groups. And there was a sigvificant difference in the post-treatment betwenn the groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2.
      Forth, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective compared to without sibling involvement in improving the overall language abilities of children with language disorder. There was a signigicant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the overall language abilities of the two groups. However, there was no signigicant difference in the post-treatment between the two groups. Therefore, language sample analyses seemed to be more sensitive than language tests to identify overall language sbilities in children with language disorders.
      As described above, the functional language intervention with sibling involvement was effective in improving the language abilitied of children with language disorders.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 6
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 6
      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 문제 = 6
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 6
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 9
      • 1. 언어장애 아동의 언어특성 = 9
      • 2. 기능적 언어중재 = 23
      • 3. 또래 및 형제 개입 중재 = 30
      • III. 연구방법 = 38
      • 1. 연구대상 = 38
      • 2. 실험설계 = 43
      • 3. 실험도구 = 44
      • 4. 실험절차 = 54
      • 5. 언어능력 산출 기준 = 56
      • 6. 관찰 방법 및 관찰자 간 신뢰도 = 58
      • 7. 자료처리 = 59
      • IV. 결과 = 60
      • 1. 의미론 측면에서 어휘다양도 및 의미관계 다양성 변화 = 60
      • 2. 형태론 측면에서 평균형태소길이 변화 = 63
      • 3. 화용론 측면에서 의사소통 의도 다양성 변화 = 65
      • 4. 전반적인 언어능력 변화 = 66
      • V. 논의 및 고찰 = 75
      • 1. 의미론 측면에서 어휘다양도 및 의미관계 다양성 변화 = 75
      • 2. 형태론 측면에서 평균형태소길이 변화 = 80
      • 3. 화용론 측면에서 의사소통 의도 다양성 변화 = 82
      • 4. 전반적인 언어능력 변화 = 84
      • VI. 결론 및 제언 = 86
      • 참고문헌 = 90
      • 영문초록 = 117
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼