RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    현대 국어 한자어 파생법 연구 : 사전에 등재된 한자어 접사를 중심으로 = (A) study on derivation of Sino-Korean in modern Korean

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8848096

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 동국대학교 대학원, 1999

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 동국대학교 대학원 , 국어국문학과 , 1999. 8

    • 발행연도

      1999

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      715 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      820 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      82p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 70-73

    • 소장기관
      • 광운대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Sino-Korean covers more than half of Korean lexicon, so it has specific gravity. But when we compile the dictionary, it establish Sino-Korean title selection respectively, which makes other public have trouble in using language. Furthermore, not only establishment criterion on classification of apart of speech is not accuracy but also specific description on meaning of Sino-Korean which is made up of useful Sino-Korean example is insufficiency.
    This thesis reviews significance of Chinese character on individual Sino-Korean and tries to review about speciality of form structure of Korean Sino-Korean and function as an affix, previous to the serious discussion on Sino-Korean structure.
    Classification of Sino-Korean morpheme is following.
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    I divide it into the free forms and bound forms according to the independency of Sino-Korean. Bound forms can be divided into the bound root which is center of the word and affix which is the surroundings. It is related to their function in composing Sino-Korean.
    I investigate the Sino-Korean affix registered on <Choso˘no˘ Daesajun>(1992), <Urimal K'u˘nsajun>(1992), <Kuko˘ Daesajun>(1996), <Saekuko˘ Sajun>(1998). I deal with the 39 Sino-Koreans which are used more than two in each dictionary. The following is
    各, 角, 强, 客, 絹, 高, 貴, 難, 單, 堂, 當, 綱, 每, 綿, 名, 美, 白, 別, 本, 生, 性, 聖, 純, 新, 惡, 洋, 女, 王, 外, 人, 長, 全, 主, 重, 次, 初, 總, 土, 行
    Prefixal Sino-Koreans "名, 角, 貴, 單, 堂, 白, 本, 聖, 純, 新, 外, 全, 重, 總, 土" are classified into affix function Sino-Korean and adnominal function Sino-Korean. This criterion for affix establishment is the degree of dependency, productivity, restriction of modification limits, roots, replacement disability. According to this, affix function
    Sino-Koreans are "角, 白, 新, 外, 重, 土" and adnominal function Sino-Koreans are "名, 貴, 單, 每, 本, 聖 , 純 , 全, 總"
    Suffixal Sino-Koreans "網, 性, 人, 行" are Sino-Korean which practice the function of both suffix and noun. This criterion is the degree of dependency, productivity, the degree of change of meaning, non-clipping, concreteness.
    Double-use Sino-Koreans "强, 客, 高, 難, 黨, 堂, 名, 別, 生, 洋, 王, 長, 主, 次, 夜" can be function as both suffixal Sino-Korean and prefixal Sino-Koreans and they are classified as adnominal suffix function Sino-Koreans "當, 別" Prefix-suffix function Sino-Koreans "强, 難, 洋 初" and prefix-suffix-noun function Sino-Koreans "客, 高, 堂, 名, 生, 王, 長, 主, 次".
    Root Sino-Koreans "絹, 綿, 美, 惡, 女" are Sino-Korean which is functioned not as suffix but as noun.
    I can represent it by a chart.
    1) Prefixal Sino-Korean
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    2) Suffixal Sino-Korean
    suffix-noun function : 綱, 性, 人, 行
    3) Double use Sino-Korean
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    4) Root Sino-Korean
    noun function : 絹, 綿, 美, 惡, 女
    As mentions above, I looked into the characteristic of Sino-Korean. Sino-Korean works various grammatical functions according to function, written place, change in meaning. One of the special characteristic of Sino-Korean affix is meaning. Sino-Korean is used more than two meanings, it has variety in the part of speech and function and the differences is founded according to combined root.
    Until now through individual Chinese characters which are composed of derivation Sino-Korean, I investigate the feature of Sino-Korean affix and setting criteria.
    I can present what can't solve the theme in this thesis.
    The most disputed point in the Sino-Korean morphology study is whether we must deal with Sino-Korean within the same grammar system with the Native-Korean or we must set up unique grammar system only for Sino-Korean. In respect to that, I don't have to set up other system for Sino-Korean, but I need detailed investigation about how it is deal within native grammar system. In respect to this, I must present how it is different from existing Native-Korean because it makes two system in Korean grammar. Not yet we must have enough discussion on which one we must receive.
    In the result of investigation, prefix Sino-Koreans are 150 words, suffix Sino-Koreans are 331 words, which are registered as a suffix in each dictionary. I show 445 Sino-Koreans in <appendix>, but they are involved in the Sino-Korean which is repeated as prefix and suffix. This thesis has narrow vision because I focus on the headword which is registered as the part of existing dictionary. But continuously I must incursive study on the overall distribution function and the feature of meaning on Korean Sino-Korean.
    Also I must set up standard type on character to exchange the information with countries which are in Chinese character cultural area. While a project to assign on USC(Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set) is actively advanced, a standardization on the Chinese character which is used in Oriental 3 countries (Korea, Chinese, Japan) "Chinese character code Standardization" is also processing in Korea, China and Japan. This Standardization as a basic work to computerize Korean classical science data is really important.
    번역하기

    Sino-Korean covers more than half of Korean lexicon, so it has specific gravity. But when we compile the dictionary, it establish Sino-Korean title selection respectively, which makes other public have trouble in using language. Furthermore, not only ...

    Sino-Korean covers more than half of Korean lexicon, so it has specific gravity. But when we compile the dictionary, it establish Sino-Korean title selection respectively, which makes other public have trouble in using language. Furthermore, not only establishment criterion on classification of apart of speech is not accuracy but also specific description on meaning of Sino-Korean which is made up of useful Sino-Korean example is insufficiency.
    This thesis reviews significance of Chinese character on individual Sino-Korean and tries to review about speciality of form structure of Korean Sino-Korean and function as an affix, previous to the serious discussion on Sino-Korean structure.
    Classification of Sino-Korean morpheme is following.
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    I divide it into the free forms and bound forms according to the independency of Sino-Korean. Bound forms can be divided into the bound root which is center of the word and affix which is the surroundings. It is related to their function in composing Sino-Korean.
    I investigate the Sino-Korean affix registered on <Choso˘no˘ Daesajun>(1992), <Urimal K'u˘nsajun>(1992), <Kuko˘ Daesajun>(1996), <Saekuko˘ Sajun>(1998). I deal with the 39 Sino-Koreans which are used more than two in each dictionary. The following is
    各, 角, 强, 客, 絹, 高, 貴, 難, 單, 堂, 當, 綱, 每, 綿, 名, 美, 白, 別, 本, 生, 性, 聖, 純, 新, 惡, 洋, 女, 王, 外, 人, 長, 全, 主, 重, 次, 初, 總, 土, 行
    Prefixal Sino-Koreans "名, 角, 貴, 單, 堂, 白, 本, 聖, 純, 新, 外, 全, 重, 總, 土" are classified into affix function Sino-Korean and adnominal function Sino-Korean. This criterion for affix establishment is the degree of dependency, productivity, restriction of modification limits, roots, replacement disability. According to this, affix function
    Sino-Koreans are "角, 白, 新, 外, 重, 土" and adnominal function Sino-Koreans are "名, 貴, 單, 每, 本, 聖 , 純 , 全, 總"
    Suffixal Sino-Koreans "網, 性, 人, 行" are Sino-Korean which practice the function of both suffix and noun. This criterion is the degree of dependency, productivity, the degree of change of meaning, non-clipping, concreteness.
    Double-use Sino-Koreans "强, 客, 高, 難, 黨, 堂, 名, 別, 生, 洋, 王, 長, 主, 次, 夜" can be function as both suffixal Sino-Korean and prefixal Sino-Koreans and they are classified as adnominal suffix function Sino-Koreans "當, 別" Prefix-suffix function Sino-Koreans "强, 難, 洋 初" and prefix-suffix-noun function Sino-Koreans "客, 高, 堂, 名, 生, 王, 長, 主, 次".
    Root Sino-Koreans "絹, 綿, 美, 惡, 女" are Sino-Korean which is functioned not as suffix but as noun.
    I can represent it by a chart.
    1) Prefixal Sino-Korean
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    2) Suffixal Sino-Korean
    suffix-noun function : 綱, 性, 人, 行
    3) Double use Sino-Korean
    ◁수식 삽입▷(원문을 참조하세요)
    4) Root Sino-Korean
    noun function : 絹, 綿, 美, 惡, 女
    As mentions above, I looked into the characteristic of Sino-Korean. Sino-Korean works various grammatical functions according to function, written place, change in meaning. One of the special characteristic of Sino-Korean affix is meaning. Sino-Korean is used more than two meanings, it has variety in the part of speech and function and the differences is founded according to combined root.
    Until now through individual Chinese characters which are composed of derivation Sino-Korean, I investigate the feature of Sino-Korean affix and setting criteria.
    I can present what can't solve the theme in this thesis.
    The most disputed point in the Sino-Korean morphology study is whether we must deal with Sino-Korean within the same grammar system with the Native-Korean or we must set up unique grammar system only for Sino-Korean. In respect to that, I don't have to set up other system for Sino-Korean, but I need detailed investigation about how it is deal within native grammar system. In respect to this, I must present how it is different from existing Native-Korean because it makes two system in Korean grammar. Not yet we must have enough discussion on which one we must receive.
    In the result of investigation, prefix Sino-Koreans are 150 words, suffix Sino-Koreans are 331 words, which are registered as a suffix in each dictionary. I show 445 Sino-Koreans in <appendix>, but they are involved in the Sino-Korean which is repeated as prefix and suffix. This thesis has narrow vision because I focus on the headword which is registered as the part of existing dictionary. But continuously I must incursive study on the overall distribution function and the feature of meaning on Korean Sino-Korean.
    Also I must set up standard type on character to exchange the information with countries which are in Chinese character cultural area. While a project to assign on USC(Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set) is actively advanced, a standardization on the Chinese character which is used in Oriental 3 countries (Korea, Chinese, Japan) "Chinese character code Standardization" is also processing in Korea, China and Japan. This Standardization as a basic work to computerize Korean classical science data is really important.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적 = 1
    • 1.2. 연구 범위와 방법 = 2
    • 1.3. 선행 연구 검토 = 4
    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1. 연구 목적 = 1
    • 1.2. 연구 범위와 방법 = 2
    • 1.3. 선행 연구 검토 = 4
    • 제2장 한자어 형태 범주와 접사 설정 기준 = 7
    • 2.1. 한자어 정의와 특성 = 7
    • 2.2. 한자어 형태 범주 = 9
    • 2.3. 한자어 접사 설정 기준 = 11
    • 2.3.1. 한자어 형태소의 분류 = 15
    • 2.3.2. 한자어 접두사 설정 기준 = 17
    • 2.3.3. 한자어 접미사 설정 기준 = 19
    • 제3장 한자어 파생법 = 22
    • 3.1. 접두한자어 = 23
    • 3.1.1. 접두사기능 = 25
    • 3.1.2. 관형사기능 = 31
    • 3.2. 접미한자어 = 40
    • 3.2.1. 접미사-명사기능 = 41
    • 3.3. 양용한자어(兩用漢字語) = 45
    • 3.3.1. 관형사와 접미사기능 = 46
    • 3.3.2. 접두사와 접미사기능 = 48
    • 3.3.3. 접두사와 접미사, 명사기능 = 52
    • 3.4. 어근한자어 = 64
    • 제4장 결론 = 67
    • 참고문헌 = 70
    • 부록 = 74
    • Abstract = 80
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼