RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유아의 공정분배 개념에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Justice Distribution Concept of Children

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8553014

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purposes of this study are as follow ;
      First, to analyze how the children who have the different financial & social environment consider the feature of receivers - age, contribution, and need feature- about deviding the rewards.
      Second, to analyze the aspect of distribution regarding sex, age, and social economic environment.
      Third, to analyze the aspects of distribution regarding friend group & group.
      To achieve this objective, 120 children aged from six to seven years were selected randomly at 'A' kindergarten in Apgujung-Dong, 'S' nursery in Youngdungpo-Dong, and 'C' kindergarten in Chunggok-Dong, Seoul. All of them participated in the project of distribution activity.
      The collected data were analyzed by 5-way-ANOVA and t-test.
      The result of this study are as follow ;
      1. The significant difference of distribution quantity is found regarding the feature of receivers.
      2. In the distinction of sex, male distributed rewards to receivers equally but female distributed rewards to receivers unequally regarding the feature of receivers.
      3. In the age point of view, the significant difference of six-year-old children is found in the quantity of distribution but the significant difference of seven-year-old children is not found.
      4. In the social relationship point of view, the significant difference in the friend group is found in the quantity of distribution - children distributed more rewards to the age feature(the oldest person) and less rewards to the need feature(the poor person). On the other hand, the significant difference in others group is found in the quantity of distribution - the children distributed more rewards to contribution feature(the person who worked high performance of work proportion) and less rewards to the need feature(the poor).
      5. In a social economic point of view, the significant difference in upper class children is not found in the quantity of distribution. But the significant difference in lower class children is found - the children distributed more rewards to contribution feature and less rewards to the need feature.
      번역하기

      The purposes of this study are as follow ; First, to analyze how the children who have the different financial & social environment consider the feature of receivers - age, contribution, and need feature- about deviding the rewards. Second, to analy...

      The purposes of this study are as follow ;
      First, to analyze how the children who have the different financial & social environment consider the feature of receivers - age, contribution, and need feature- about deviding the rewards.
      Second, to analyze the aspect of distribution regarding sex, age, and social economic environment.
      Third, to analyze the aspects of distribution regarding friend group & group.
      To achieve this objective, 120 children aged from six to seven years were selected randomly at 'A' kindergarten in Apgujung-Dong, 'S' nursery in Youngdungpo-Dong, and 'C' kindergarten in Chunggok-Dong, Seoul. All of them participated in the project of distribution activity.
      The collected data were analyzed by 5-way-ANOVA and t-test.
      The result of this study are as follow ;
      1. The significant difference of distribution quantity is found regarding the feature of receivers.
      2. In the distinction of sex, male distributed rewards to receivers equally but female distributed rewards to receivers unequally regarding the feature of receivers.
      3. In the age point of view, the significant difference of six-year-old children is found in the quantity of distribution but the significant difference of seven-year-old children is not found.
      4. In the social relationship point of view, the significant difference in the friend group is found in the quantity of distribution - children distributed more rewards to the age feature(the oldest person) and less rewards to the need feature(the poor person). On the other hand, the significant difference in others group is found in the quantity of distribution - the children distributed more rewards to contribution feature(the person who worked high performance of work proportion) and less rewards to the need feature(the poor).
      5. In a social economic point of view, the significant difference in upper class children is not found in the quantity of distribution. But the significant difference in lower class children is found - the children distributed more rewards to contribution feature and less rewards to the need feature.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 정의 및 공정 분배의 개념 = 6
      • 2. 분배 정의의 원칙 = 8
      • 3. 유아기 공정 분배 개념의 발달 단계 = 11
      • 4. 사회계층의 개념 및 분류 = 17
      • 5. 선행 연구 = 20
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 24
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 24
      • 2. 연구 및 검사 도구 = 27
      • 3. 연구 절차 = 29
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 32
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 33
      • 1. 피분배자의 특성에 따른 분배 양상의 차이 = 34
      • 2. 피분배자의 특성에 따른 성별 분배양상의 차이 = 35
      • 3. 피분배자의 특성에 따른 연령별 분배양상의 차이 = 36
      • 4. 피분배자의 특성에 따른 사회적 친분관계별 분배양상의 차이 = 38
      • 5. 피분배자의 특성에 따른 사회계층별 분배양상의 차이 = 40
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 49
      • 1. 요약 = 49
      • 2. 논의 및 결론 = 51
      • 3. 제언 = 54
      • 참고문헌 = 56
      • ABSTRACT = 61
      • 부록 = 63
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼