旅行費用法에 의한 觀光資源의 價値評價 : 변산반도 국립공원의 사례

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

From the economics point of view, tourism resources along with clean air and water can be categorized as typical nonmarket commodities. Nonmarket commodities can generally be valued by either the expenditure function approach or the income compensation approach. Tourism resources are an important resources for the human being who want to take a rest and recreate. However, most tourism resources are not priced in the market place. Accordingly the valuation of tourism resources due to consistently and rapidly increasing interest should be evaluated properly in order to establish management policy for and efficient resource allocation.
The overall objective of this study was to estimate the economic valuation of tourism resources for Pyonsanbando National Park using the travel cost method(TCM) in order to practical use in developing and preserving its tourism resources. TCM is nonmarket valuation techniques which is commonly used to estimate benefits received by participants in travel. Generally, there are two approaches in TCM, the zonal travel method and individual travel cost method. In zonal TCM, the travellers residing at similar distances(In this studies, the zones are divided by 20㎞) from a travel destination are aggregated into zones. With information of each zone's population, the visit rate of each zone is calculated. In individual TCM, the quantity variable is defined as the number of travel a year by individual. Regressing this quantity variable on individual travel cost, travel time, and other demand shifters gives more precise estimates of parameters than the zonal travel cost approach.
Recently, a series of paper have attempted to accommodate the diversity of visitors in travel cost methods by separating monetary outlays for travel into two categories: onsite costs and long distance travel costs. In this studies, the travel cost is calculated by two ways. That is, C1 is long distance travel cost plus onsite costs and C2 is long distance travel cost only. The independent variables applying to this study are C2, age, the length of education and household income. The zonal and individual TCM considered the opportunity cost of travel time and traffic costs as the travel costs. The opportunity cost of travel time in this studies was about 30% of average payment of all industries and applied C2 to a travel cost.
This paper estimates the value of tourism resources of Pyonsanbando National Park. A travel cost method(TCM) is used to estimated the economic benefits, measured by consumer surplus, to the users of Pyonsanbando National Park. Based on the data gathered from the Pyonsanbando National Park, the value of tourism resources for Pyonsanbando National Park is estimated ranging from 163,635 won to 433,198 won per person a year in zonal TCM, depending on the demand functions, that is, linear demand function, long-long demand function, semilog demand function. In individual TCM, its value is estimated ranging from 298,500 won to 468,594 won per person a year depending on the demand functions.
The results showed that benefit estimated from two approaches were considerably different. Although benefit estimation from the individual TCM was much higher than the zonal TCM, these values are not statistically different using conventional significant levels. Irrespective of functional forms, the price elasticity of tourists' demand on Pyonsanbando National Park was estimated to be -0.55 to -0.72 which is inelastic, suggesting that 1% increase in the travel costs will reduce 0.56~0.72% in the number of travels.
The estimation of tourism resources value of Pyonsanbando National Park that should come to main interests for rationality and efficiency of tourism planning on the Pyonsanbando National Park. On the basis of this study may suggest many issues to establish tourism policy for a way of development and preservation of Pyonsanbando and to maximize an individual and public welfare.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
• 제2절 연구목적 = 3
• 제3절 연구범위 = 5
• 제2장 이론적 배경 = 6
• 제1절 관광자원 = 6
• 1. 관광자원의 개념 = 6
• 2. 관광자원의 분류 = 7
• 3. 관광자원의 가치 = 8
• 4. 관광자원의 개발 = 10
• 제2절 국립공원 = 12
• 1. 국립공원의 개념 = 12
• 2. 한국의 국립공원 = 13
• 3. 국립공원의 관리상 문제점 = 15
• 4. 변산반도 국립공원 = 16
• 제3절 자원가치의 평가 = 22
• 1. 자원가치평가의 이론적 배경 = 22
• 2. 자원가치의 구분 = 28
• 3. 가치평가방법 = 29
• 제4절 여행비용법 = 34
• 1. 지역여행비용법 = 35
• 2. 개인여행비용법 = 38
• 3. 선행연구 = 41
• 제3장 연구방법의 설계 = 47
• 제1절 조사설계 = 47
• 1. 조사대상지 설정 = 47
• 2. 조사설계 = 48
• 3. 설문지의 구성 = 50
• 제2절 연구모델설정 = 52
• 1. 개인여행비용법 = 55
• 2. 지역여행비용법 = 56
• 제3절 여행비용산출 및 분석방법 = 57
• 1. 동심원 구성 = 57
• 2. 여행비용의 구성 = 60
• 3. 분석방법 = 64
• 제4장 분석결과 및 해석 = 67
• 제1절 변산반도 방문객 이용특성 = 67
• 1. 방문객의 특성 = 67
• 2. 방문형태 = 71
• 제2절 지역여행비용법 실증분석 결과 = 75
• 1. 동심원의 기초통계분석 = 75
• 2. 지역 회귀모형의 분석 및 결과 = 77
• 3. 지역 최적모형 선택 = 81
• 제3절 개인여행비용법 실증분석 결과 = 83
• 1. 개인의 기초통계분석 = 83
• 2. 개인 회귀모형 분석 및 결과 = 85
• 3. 개인 최적모형의 선택 = 89
• 4. 여행비용 탄력도계산 = 90
• 제4절 소비자잉여 계산 = 92
• 1. 지역여행비용법의 소비자잉여 = 92
• 2. 개인여행비용법의 소비자잉여 = 99
• 3. 소비자잉여의 비교 = 104
• 제5장 결론 = 106
• 제1절 결론 및 시사 = 106
• 제2절 연구의 한계 = 109
• 참고문헌 = 111
• <설문지> = 118
• ABSTRACT = 124