RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      또래간 상호작용 유형과 인기도에 따른 유아의 의사소통 유형에 관한 연구 = (A) study of children communication patterns in relation to peer interaction styles and social status

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8423459

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 서울여자대학교 대학원, 1999

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 서울여자대학교 대학원 , 아동학과 , 1999

      • 발행연도

        1999

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        598.12 판사항(4)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        iii, 87p. ; 26cm.

      • 소장기관
        • 광운대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 덕성여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울시립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of the present study is to find out differences in communication patterns in relation to peer interaction styles and social status. The research questions in this study are :

      1. Do children communication patterns differ in peer interaction styles?
      2. Do children communication patterns differ in social status?
      3. Do communication patterns differ in relation to peer interaction styles and social status?

      The total subjects were 100 five-year-old children in three child care centers located in Seoul. Children were grouped into popular(22), controversial(19), rejected(19), neglected(16), and normal(22) based on the results of a sociometric assessment.

      The positive and negative nomination procedure (Coie, Dodge & Coppetelli, 1982) was used to measure social status. To classify communication patterns, the tool used in the study of Black and Logan(1995) were revised with pilot study. Communication patterns included "turn-taking skills" and "utterance types" as expressed in peer interaction during free play interaction.

      To find the level of reliability in communication patterns 18 five-year-old children were examined in pilot study. Results showed a level of reliability of 0.89.

      Children were observed and video taped in a small playroom equipped with a variety of toys and props designed to elicit collaborative interaction. The children were observed in three types of interaction situation(dyad, host in triad, entry in triad) and were measured their social status.

      Data were analyzed with Analysis of variance(ANOVA) and Multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance(MANOVA) to find out the differences in communication patterns in peer interaction and social status.

      The results of this study can be summarized as follows:

      1. There were significant differences in the child communication patterns of each peer interaction style. When the child is host in a triad, took more communication than when in a dyad or entry in triad situation.
      2. There were significant differences in the communication patterns of social status. Popular children communicated positively and appropriately for the smooth progression of play. Unpopular children took many irrelevant turns, interrupted others, made demands, etc.
      3. There were significant differences in the communication patterns according to peer interaction styles and social status. When the entry in a triad, rejected children took many irrelevant turns, and frequently took turns that interrupt when the host in a triad. Popular children made many suggestions and explanations when the host in a triad.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the present study is to find out differences in communication patterns in relation to peer interaction styles and social status. The research questions in this study are : 1. Do children communication patterns differ in peer interac...

      The purpose of the present study is to find out differences in communication patterns in relation to peer interaction styles and social status. The research questions in this study are :

      1. Do children communication patterns differ in peer interaction styles?
      2. Do children communication patterns differ in social status?
      3. Do communication patterns differ in relation to peer interaction styles and social status?

      The total subjects were 100 five-year-old children in three child care centers located in Seoul. Children were grouped into popular(22), controversial(19), rejected(19), neglected(16), and normal(22) based on the results of a sociometric assessment.

      The positive and negative nomination procedure (Coie, Dodge & Coppetelli, 1982) was used to measure social status. To classify communication patterns, the tool used in the study of Black and Logan(1995) were revised with pilot study. Communication patterns included "turn-taking skills" and "utterance types" as expressed in peer interaction during free play interaction.

      To find the level of reliability in communication patterns 18 five-year-old children were examined in pilot study. Results showed a level of reliability of 0.89.

      Children were observed and video taped in a small playroom equipped with a variety of toys and props designed to elicit collaborative interaction. The children were observed in three types of interaction situation(dyad, host in triad, entry in triad) and were measured their social status.

      Data were analyzed with Analysis of variance(ANOVA) and Multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance(MANOVA) to find out the differences in communication patterns in peer interaction and social status.

      The results of this study can be summarized as follows:

      1. There were significant differences in the child communication patterns of each peer interaction style. When the child is host in a triad, took more communication than when in a dyad or entry in triad situation.
      2. There were significant differences in the communication patterns of social status. Popular children communicated positively and appropriately for the smooth progression of play. Unpopular children took many irrelevant turns, interrupted others, made demands, etc.
      3. There were significant differences in the communication patterns according to peer interaction styles and social status. When the entry in a triad, rejected children took many irrelevant turns, and frequently took turns that interrupt when the host in a triad. Popular children made many suggestions and explanations when the host in a triad.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구문제 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 또래관계 = 6
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구문제 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 또래관계 = 6
      • 2. 의사소통 = 15
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 25
      • 1. 연구대상 = 25
      • 2. 연구도구 = 26
      • 3. 연구절차 = 31
      • 4. 자료분석 = 32
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 34
      • 1. 또래간 상호작용 유형에 따른 유아의 의사소통 유형 = 34
      • 2. 인기도에 따른 유아의 의사소통 유형 = 45
      • 3. 또래간 상호작용 유형과 인기도에 따른 유아의 의사소통 유형 = 54
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 60
      • 1. 논의 = 60
      • 2. 결론 및 제언 = 64
      • 참고문헌 = 67
      • 부록 = 77
      • ABSTRACT = 85
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼