文化財 保護法 硏究 : 文化財享有權의 法理를 中心으로 = (A)Study on the law for protection of cultural properties

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Article 8 of the 5th Republic Constitution reads “The State shall strive to sustain and develop the cultural heritage and to enhance national culture.” And, Article 1 of the Law for the Protection of Cultural Properties reads “The purpose of this law shall be to contribute to the cultural advancement of the general public and to the cultural development of the world.” In the rapidly developing country like Korea, however, the cultural remains are apt to be damaged or lost, in case legislation concerned is insufficient.
It seems to be necessary to investigate into the development of existing law on cultural properties and to propose how to preserve them effectively and legally.
Cultural properties are the remains of folk-culture which deserve to be preserved. They are to be perished, but for proper protecting measures. Therefore each nation is putting in order the legal system for the protection of cultural properties and taking all the possible measures for their maintenance and utilization.
The destructions of cultural and historical circumstances, which are due to the extensive effect of the national land development, have at last brought about people's longing for 'Cultural Age'.
Cultural properties are never restored, however, if once destroyed and their value disappears if their forms are altered.
II
This dissertation purports to review the historical background of the Law for the Protection of Cultural Properties of Korea and to specify the import of cultural properties. The dissertation also examines the actual aspects of cultural properties protection in some other countries.
The national land development in highly industrialized societies has destroyed cultural properties, no less than the war, while the historical environments have been destroyed under the name of developments.
Such situations made some fore-runners and local inhabitants arouse a movement for the protection of cultural properties. The movement has eventually developed into an action for the people's enjoying right of cultural properties.
Many remains have been destroyed in Japan whose legal system is very much similar to that of Korea. Eventually the movement for protecting cultural properties has developed into the administrative litigation from the inhabitant's action. The IBA Ruins Case carried into court as the first appeal attracts public attention in terms of the plaintiff qualification and the enjoyment right of cultural properties.
That case is currently under the state of closing trial in the Appellate Court. Judging from judicial precedent in Japan's courts, the plaintiff does not seem to win the suit.
III
This kind of dillemma, shown in Japan today, between the land development and the preservation of cultural properties, will be brought up in Korea sooner or later.
Making reference to Japan's cases, this dissertation attempts to propose a new legal principles of enjoying cultural properties in terms of the relationship between the two propositions.
All the possible preparatory legal systems for the protection of cultural properties are also examined in the dissertation.
In connection with the latter problem, it is suggested that the cultural properties committee should necessary become deiberation organization, and local organizations and reserch institutes should participate in the protection and utilization of cultural properties.
The importance is pointed out to establish the administrative procedures for designating or annulling cultural property items and for their protection from the national land development. This problem remains, however, open to further investigation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第I章 緖論 = 1
• 第l節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍 = 5
• 第二章 國土開發과 文化財保護 = 8
• 第l節 開發과 保存 = 8
• l. 開發과 文化財 現狀變更 = 8
• 2. 開發과 文化財保存 = 14
• 第2節 文化財의 保護 = 18
• l. 文化財保護의 意義 = 18
• 2. 又化財保護의 實態 = 25
• 第3節 文化財의 定義 = 31
• 第4節 文化財保護法上의 文化財 = 37
• 第5節 文化財槪念의 擴大 = 42
• 第三章 文化財保護法制의 沿革 = 45
• 第l節 沿革의 槪觀 = 45
• 第2節 保存規則時期의 法制 = 47
• 第3節 保存令時期의 法制 = 60
• 第4節 保護法의 制定 = 63
• l. 韓·日 制定法의 比較 = 64
• 2. 文化財保護法의 制定過程 = 70
• 3. 制定時의 文化財保護法의 特徵 = 72
• 第5節 文化財保護法의 改政 = 75
• 第四章 文化財保護의 實際 = 83
• 第l節 韓國의 文化財保護運動 = 83
• l. 文化財保護運動 = 83
• 2. 文化保護運動의 成果 = 85
• 第2節 英國의 保護法制와 住民運動 = 88
• l. 保護法制의 發展 = 88
• 2. National Trust = 91
• 3. 2次大戰후의 保護 = 94
• 第3節 프랑스의 文化財保護와 再開發 = 96
• l. 保護法制의 發展 = 96
• 2. Malraux 法에 의한 再開發 = 100
• 第4節 日本의 國土開發과 文化財保護運動 = 104
• l. 日本에서의 開發과 保存 = 104
• 2. 日本의 文化財保護運動 = 113
• 第5節 UNESCO의 汎世界的 保護運動 = 119
• 第5章 文化財訴訟과 그 爭点 = 128
• 第l節 槪觀 = 128
• 第2節 美國에서의 文化財訴訟 = 129
• l. 文化財保存의 特色 = 129
• 2. Grand Central Terminal 判決 = 132
• 3. 歷史環境의 保存과 法 = 137
• 第3節 日本의 文化財訴訟 = 140
• l. 住民訴訟 = 140
• 2. 文化財抗告訴訟 = 147
• 3. 伊場訴訟判決의 反應 = 156
• 第4節 文化財訴訟의 爭點 = 159
• l. 序言 = 159
• 2. 法律上의 利益 = 162
• 3. 文化財를 享有하는 權利 = 170
• 4. 歷史的·文化的環境權 = 179
• 第六童 文化財享有權의 法理 = 188
• 第1節 槪說 = 188
• 第2節 文化財享有權의 意義 = 191
• l. 槪念 = 191
• 2. 文化財享有權의 主體 = 194
• 3. 文化財享有權의 內容 = 195
• 第3節 文化財享有權의 法的性格 = 199
• l. 權利否定說(消極說) = 199
• 2. 權利認定說(積極說) = 200
• 第4節 文化財享有權의 侵害와 救濟 = 208
• 第七章 結論 - 文化財享有權의 確立을 위하여 = 210
• 參考文獻 = 216
• ABSTRACT = 228