RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국 특수교육 발전을 위한 통합교육 운용방안 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8156844

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      경북 : 대구대학교, 2001

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2001

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      379.2 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상북도

    • 형태사항

      iv, 165p. ; 26 cm.

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 세종대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 호남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purposed of this study is to provide a historical background of special education and full inclusive education, paradigm shifts and school reconstruction. Special education required in society shall be integrated with normal education. Education based on the objectives and microscopic views currently used, following realism, positivism and determinism has neglected qualitative aspects such as personal existence, intention, and decision making. Mentally and physically handicapped people are given an education that just helps them adjust to normal life through minimal functional recovery, a separate education that protects them through school education or mainstreaming education, a more improved type of education(Kim, Joung-Kwon, 2001). However, lately society is moving toward a subjective macroscopic, interpretive or humanist paradigm. It is a society that respects the characteristics and rights of humans. The students with disabilities who receive special education are not subjects for protection or benefits, hut are subjects who have equitable rights and they can enjoy advanced culture themselves. For this, full inclusion in education is required for all stages of school education. In this view, an examination is given on how much full inclusion in education between students for special education and normal students can he achieved to find a better style of fully inclusive education.
    The concept of fully inclusive education can be traced back from mainstreaming, normalization and having an environment with the fewest restriction.
    In general, what should be of fully inclusive education is discussed in the following aspects:
    First, it fits the assurance of fundamental human rights and social justice pursued by most countries. people have their own personalities and personal rights, and have rights to be provided public education, and countries have duties and responsibilities to educate people properly according to the rights given them. Second, education is natural in terms of a constitution that is based on equity and the integration of curriculum for school education is naturally pursued for social integration and proper education. In modern society where scientific technologies dominate living and people live beyond time and space, separate living and learning due to the mental and physical disabilities is not required anymore.
    Third, it complements a society in the development of social welfare system. The focus on the welfare society is given on the integration of the isolated. For this, students with disabilities need to acquire necessary technologies and methods for regular living along with non-disabled students.
    In Korea, various continuing efforts have been made for fully inclusive education, starting with the establishment of special classes for students with mild retardation at Chilsung Elementary School in Daegu in 1971. The Special Education Promotion Regulations revised in 1994 requires education using textbooks, remedial education and occupational education through curriculum, education methods and media suitable for the subjects of special education. (Special Education Promotion Law Part 2, Article 1)
    An effort for inclusive education under the existing laws and regulations is found in the conversion of educational systems.
    Inclusive education aims to establish systems in which subjects of special education are arranged in regular classes and considers special schools and classes as institutions which are in charge of adjustment training and support for inclusive education. It tries to change the established arrangement of (special classes->special schools->regular classes)into a new one ( regular classes->special classes ->special schools ).
    For a successful fully inclusive education, teacher training is necessary. In this context, a priority of teacher training is given on teachers of regular classes who are in charge of special education part-time, teachers who instruct subjects of special education and are arranged in regular classes and teachers of regular classes who perform fully inclusive education of special schools and regular classes.
    The Korean government established the basic research and planning in special education as one of the policies of special education which meets the social demands of the 21st century for national special educational institutions. As many students with disabilities as possible should be accepted to regular schools and for this, an essential environment, facilities and faculty should be available. Specifically, special classes should provide convenient access for students with disabilities and convenient facilities such as toilets for the disabled and ramps should be expanded.
    The establishment of administrative systems and effective organizational management suitable for fully inclusive education are necessary.
    A cooperative plan with regular education as well as with a long and short-term development plan for special education should be established and then the plan should be utilized as a foundation of social development.
    The full inclusive education is a comprehensive approach to responding to the needs of all students in a home, school and society. so following table is a comparison between exclusive and inclusive society.
    번역하기

    The purposed of this study is to provide a historical background of special education and full inclusive education, paradigm shifts and school reconstruction. Special education required in society shall be integrated with normal education. Education b...

    The purposed of this study is to provide a historical background of special education and full inclusive education, paradigm shifts and school reconstruction. Special education required in society shall be integrated with normal education. Education based on the objectives and microscopic views currently used, following realism, positivism and determinism has neglected qualitative aspects such as personal existence, intention, and decision making. Mentally and physically handicapped people are given an education that just helps them adjust to normal life through minimal functional recovery, a separate education that protects them through school education or mainstreaming education, a more improved type of education(Kim, Joung-Kwon, 2001). However, lately society is moving toward a subjective macroscopic, interpretive or humanist paradigm. It is a society that respects the characteristics and rights of humans. The students with disabilities who receive special education are not subjects for protection or benefits, hut are subjects who have equitable rights and they can enjoy advanced culture themselves. For this, full inclusion in education is required for all stages of school education. In this view, an examination is given on how much full inclusion in education between students for special education and normal students can he achieved to find a better style of fully inclusive education.
    The concept of fully inclusive education can be traced back from mainstreaming, normalization and having an environment with the fewest restriction.
    In general, what should be of fully inclusive education is discussed in the following aspects:
    First, it fits the assurance of fundamental human rights and social justice pursued by most countries. people have their own personalities and personal rights, and have rights to be provided public education, and countries have duties and responsibilities to educate people properly according to the rights given them. Second, education is natural in terms of a constitution that is based on equity and the integration of curriculum for school education is naturally pursued for social integration and proper education. In modern society where scientific technologies dominate living and people live beyond time and space, separate living and learning due to the mental and physical disabilities is not required anymore.
    Third, it complements a society in the development of social welfare system. The focus on the welfare society is given on the integration of the isolated. For this, students with disabilities need to acquire necessary technologies and methods for regular living along with non-disabled students.
    In Korea, various continuing efforts have been made for fully inclusive education, starting with the establishment of special classes for students with mild retardation at Chilsung Elementary School in Daegu in 1971. The Special Education Promotion Regulations revised in 1994 requires education using textbooks, remedial education and occupational education through curriculum, education methods and media suitable for the subjects of special education. (Special Education Promotion Law Part 2, Article 1)
    An effort for inclusive education under the existing laws and regulations is found in the conversion of educational systems.
    Inclusive education aims to establish systems in which subjects of special education are arranged in regular classes and considers special schools and classes as institutions which are in charge of adjustment training and support for inclusive education. It tries to change the established arrangement of (special classes->special schools->regular classes)into a new one ( regular classes->special classes ->special schools ).
    For a successful fully inclusive education, teacher training is necessary. In this context, a priority of teacher training is given on teachers of regular classes who are in charge of special education part-time, teachers who instruct subjects of special education and are arranged in regular classes and teachers of regular classes who perform fully inclusive education of special schools and regular classes.
    The Korean government established the basic research and planning in special education as one of the policies of special education which meets the social demands of the 21st century for national special educational institutions. As many students with disabilities as possible should be accepted to regular schools and for this, an essential environment, facilities and faculty should be available. Specifically, special classes should provide convenient access for students with disabilities and convenient facilities such as toilets for the disabled and ramps should be expanded.
    The establishment of administrative systems and effective organizational management suitable for fully inclusive education are necessary.
    A cooperative plan with regular education as well as with a long and short-term development plan for special education should be established and then the plan should be utilized as a foundation of social development.
    The full inclusive education is a comprehensive approach to responding to the needs of all students in a home, school and society. so following table is a comparison between exclusive and inclusive society.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • 3. 연구의 방법 = 4
    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • 3. 연구의 방법 = 4
    • II. 통합교육의 역사적 맥락 = 11
    • 1. 통합교육의 개념과 정의 = 12
    • 2. 특수교육과 통합교육의 발전과정 = 22
    • 3. 통합교육에 대한 담론 = 41
    • 4. 한국 통합교육의 배경 = 52
    • III. 사회 패러다임의 변화와 통합교육 = 62
    • 1. 사회 패러다임의 의미와 탈 현대화 사회 = 62
    • 2. 탈 현대화사회에서의 교육 = 65
    • 3. 탈 현대화 사회에서 특수교육의 특성과 통합화 노력 = 71
    • 4. 한국사회 변화와 통합교육의 노력 = 76
    • IV. 학교재구조화운동과 통합교육 = 90
    • 1. 학교재구조화운동 = 90
    • 2. 학교재구조화와 통합교육의 공통점 = 98
    • 3. 학교재구조화운동에 기초한 통합교육 모델 = 106
    • 4. 성공적인 학교재구조화와 통합교육 = 113
    • V. 한국 통합교육의 발전방향 = 119
    • 1. 통합학교 교육의 기본방향 = 120
    • 2. 통합교육의 일반적인 평가기준 = 129
    • 3. 한국 통합교육의 운용 모형 = 135
    • VI. 결론 및 제언 = 143
    • 1. 결론 = 143
    • 2. 제언 = 145
    • 참고문헌 = 146
    • 영문초록 = 162
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼