본 연구는 중·고등학교 학습자들의 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활적응을 변인으로 규정하여 세 변인의 성별·학교급별에 따른 차이, 수업 동기와 성격자아개념 수준별로 학교생활...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8145408
서울 : 홍익대학교 대학원, 2001
학위논문(석사) -- 홍익대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 교육심리전공 , 2002. 2
2001
한국어
376.261 판사항(4)
370.15 판사항(20)
서울
vi, 124p. : 삽도,도표 ; 26 cm .
참고문헌: p. 115-120
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 중·고등학교 학습자들의 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활적응을 변인으로 규정하여 세 변인의 성별·학교급별에 따른 차이, 수업 동기와 성격자아개념 수준별로 학교생활...
본 연구는 중·고등학교 학습자들의 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활적응을 변인으로 규정하여 세 변인의 성별·학교급별에 따른 차이, 수업 동기와 성격자아개념 수준별로 학교생활적응은 차이가 있는지, 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활 적응간에 정적 상관이 있는가를 알아보고, 수업 동기와 성격자아개념이 학교생활 적응에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 분석하고자 하였다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해서 다음과 같은 가설을 설정하였다.
[가설 1] 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활적응은 성별·학교급별에 따라 의의 있는 차이가 있을 젓이다.
[가설 2] 수업동기와 성격자아개념 각각의 수준별 학교생활적응은 의의 있는 차이가 있을 것이다.
[가설 3] 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활 적응간에는 의의 있는 정적 상관이 있을 것이다.
[가설 4] 수업동기와 성격자아개념 각각의 하위요인은 학교생활적응에 의의 있게 영향을 미칠 것이다.
본 연구는 위와 같은 연구 가설을 검증하기 위하여 서울·경기 소재 3개 의 중·고등학교 남·여 학습자 453명을 대상으로 하여 「학교학습동기척도, (김용래, 2000), 「자아개념척도,(김용래, 1995), 「학교적응척도,(김용래, 2000)를 사용하였다. 통계자료 처리는 SPSS/WIN프로그램을 사용하여 가설의 검증을 위해 기술통계(M, SD), t-검증, 변량분석(ANOVA). 상관분석 (Correlation Analysis>, 회귀분석(Regression AnaIysis)을 실시하였으며, 모든 가설을 유의수준 ‘.05’이하에서 검증 하였다.
본 연구의 결과를 가설별로 요약하면 다음과 같다.
첫째, 수업동기와 성격자아개념 및 학교생활적응은 성별·학교급별에 따라 의의 있는 차이가 있었다(p<.05).
둘째, 수업동기와 성격자아개념 상·중·하 수준별 학교적응은 의의 있는 차이가 있었다(p<.05).
셋째, 수업동기와 학교생활적응은 의의 있는 정적 상관을 보였고(p<.001), 성격자아개념과 학교생활적응도 의의 있는 정적 상관을 보였으며(p<.001), 이들 하위요인도 의의 있는 정적 상관을 보였다(p<.001).
넷째, 수업동기가 학교생활적응에 미치는 영향력은 41.7%이고, 성격자아 개념이 학교생활적응에 미치는 영향력은 49.5%이다. 수업동기와 성격자아 개념이 학교생활 적응에 미치는 영향력은 61.5%이며, 그 중 협조성 (32.7%)이 가장 큰 설명력을 잦고 있으며, 이에 추가해서 수업내용복습이 13.8%, 여기에 추가해서 공중질서준수, 수업내용예습, 근면·성실·정직, 수업시험 준비, 책임감, 신뢰성이 각각 7.1%, 3.1%, 1.9%, 1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% 학교생활적응을 설명하고 있다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this research is to analyze the relation among instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment. The problems of this research were as follows; 1. Is there any significant difference in instructional motiva...
The purpose of this research is to analyze the relation among instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment. The problems of this research were as follows;
1. Is there any significant difference in instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment according to the sex and school grade?
2. Is there any significant difference in school life adjustment by the high, middle, and low level of the instructional motivation and personality self-concept?
3. Is there any significant positive correlation between instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment?
4. Is there any significant effect sub-factors of instructional motivation and personality self-concept on school life adjustment?
In order to solve the above mentioned problems the following hypotheses were set up.
1. There are significant differences in instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment according to the sex and school grade.
2. There are significant difference in school life adjustment according to the high, middle, and low level of the instructional motivation and personality self-concept sub-factors.
3. There are significant positive correlations between instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment.
4. There are signigicant effects of sub-factors of instructional motivation and personality self-concept on school life adjustment.
And in order to verify above hypotheses which set up this research 453 middle and high school boys and girls was sampled randomly in Seoul area and Koung-ki area. The instruments used for the research were 「School Learning Motivation Scale」 (Kim, 2000), 「Self-Concept Scale」(Kim, 1995), 「School Adjustment Scale」(Kim, 2000). In this research, the data were analyze extracted using SPSS/WIN with the descriptive statistic (M, SD), the Pearson's correlation, the analysis of variance, and the regression analysis. All these statistical values were tested in the significant level of '.05'.
The results of this research were as follows;
1. There was a signigicant difference made by the sex in instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment(p<.05), but partially there wasn't significant difference in their sub-factors(p>.05) and There was a signigicant difference made by the grade school in instructional motivation, personality self-concept and school life adjustment(p<.05), but partially there wasn't significant difference in personality self-concept sub-factors(p>.05).
2. The school life adjustment was the significant difference by the high, middle, and low level of instructional motivation(p<.05) and The school life adjustment was the significant difference by the high, middle, and low level of personality self-concept(p<.05), but partially its sub-factors weren't any significant difference by the high, middle, and low level of personality self-concept(p>.05) and There was the significant positive correlation between instructional motivation and school life adjustment, personality self-concept and school life adjustment(p<.05).
3. The effect of instructional motivation on school life adjustment was in order of the review of instruction contents(28.6%), preparation of lesson contents(7.7%), the ready of lesson test(3.7%), the understanding of lesson contents(1.6%). The comblined effect of these was 41.7% (p<.001).
4. The effect of the personality self-concept on the school life adjustment was in order of cooperation(32.7%) and diligence·sincerity·honesty(10.2%), observance of the public order(3.6%), responsiblity (1.9%), confidence(1.0%). The combined effect of these was 49.5%(p<.001).
5. The effect of the instructional motivation and personality self-concept on school life adjustment was in order of cooperation(32.7%) and the review of lesson contents(13.8%), observance of the public order (7.1%), preparation of lesson contents(3.1%), diligence·sincerity·honesty(1.9%), the ready of lesson test(1.2%), responsiblity(0.7%), confidence(1.0%). The combined effect of these was 61.5%(p<.001).
목차 (Table of Contents)