韓國民主化와 市民社會運動

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After democratization of June 1987, civilian social movements make rapidly progress in Korea. Besides activity and discussion of civilian social movements was activated in progress by the first change of political power.
The purpose of this research is a characteristic of civilian social movements on democratization process and direction of development for 21C.
Korean Civil society couldn't develop because government-business collusion and oppressive structure by nation took the lead the capitalistic economy, But dialectical history of the people resistance attain transition to democracy from authoritarian regime, we called the June struggle.
But people's demands were failed by declaration of 6.29 on nation's secular surname authoritarian.
Ro, Tae-Woo government, even though constituted through an election by people, remained liberalization not complete formalities democracy. He held on to most institutions and ideology with the purpose of oppressing the civil society. Moreover Ro's political power was kept by the merge of the three parties.
President Kim, Young-Sam having the weakness of three parties merge, strongly emphasized that his regime was a civil government quite differently from the military one. So he drives the reforms extensively in the early days. But his reform policy was failed by grudge against and deepen of authoritarian rule.
On the other hand, civilian social movements branch into after the June struggle. Especially the Citizens Coalition for Economic Justice was activated by lawfulness and under the influence of communication.
But civil movement became ideology on the middle class in disregard of result social movement. Accordingly the field of civilian social movements formed a two-folded movement.
As the authoritarian factors of the Kim, Young-Sam government increased and delayed of democratization, civil and social movement grope about cooperation, As a result of cooperation civilian social movement, he has corrected for wrong history through the UR struggle, the special law of 5.18, labor law struggle.
The characteristic of democratization process and civilian social movements in Korea is conservation of civil society. It appeared that while activated civil movement, decline of social movement. The other side, civil movement turn 'civil movement have no citizen'
Democratization of Korea condition is independence from outside influence, balance and democracy from inequal structure of economy and national unification. In addition, Korea is placed IMF bailout by the economic crisis.
Accordingly. "Progressive civilian social movement" needs for development of democracy in Korea. "Progressive civilian social movement" means various civilian social movement based on consciousness. It is direction that he will against globalization of capital, solidarity of civil and social movement and inflect of local self-government.
Democracy is a history of resistance for rule of the state and the ruling class. State character is determined by movement's power.
"Continual tension for history", this is the soul of civilian social movement.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• ABSTRACT = ⅳ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 대상과 방법 = 3
• 제2장 민주화와 시민사회운동 = 9
• 제1절 민주화 이행에 관한 연구 분석 = 9
• 1. 기존 연구 검토 = 9
• 2. 구조와 행위의 변증법적 분석 = 15
• 제2절 시민사회와 시민사회운동 = 16
• 1. 시민사회론의 한국적 수용 = 16
• (1) 2분법 : 국가-시민사회 = 18
• (2) 3분법 : 국가-경제-시민사회 = 19
• (3) 국가-정치사회-시민사회 = 20
• (4) 시민사회론 비판 = 22
• 2. 시민사회의 개념 = 23
• 제3절 민주화와 시민사회운동과의 관계 = 27
• 제3장 민주화와 시민사회운동의 분화 = 28
• 제1절 민주화 이행과 시민사회운동의 중층화 : 87년-92년 = 28
• 1. 민주화 이행 : 87년 6월 민주항쟁 = 28
• 2. 민주화 이행의 지체 = 31
• 3. 시민사회의 분화와 시민사회운동의 중층화 = 33
• 제2절 개혁실패와 시민사회운동의 다원화 : 93년 - 97년 = 40
• 1. 민주화 이행의 개혁실패 = 40
• 2. 시민사회의 다원화와 시민사회운동의 활성화 = 42
• 제3절 민주화와 시민사회운동 분화의 특징 = 48
• 1. 시민사회운동 분화의 요인 = 48
• (1) 시민사회 외적 요인 = 48
• (2) 시민사회 내적 요인 = 49
• 2. 시민사회운동 분화의 특징 = 51
• (1) 시민운동과 민중운동의 역전 = 51
• (2) 시민사회운동의 보수화 = 55
• 제4장 민주화와 시민사회운동의 발전방향 = 59
• 제1절 민주화와 참여민주주의 = 59
• 1. 한국민주주의의 현재적 조건과 과제 = 59
• 2. 민주화를 위한 전술 : 참여민주주의 = 61
• 제2절 시민사회운동의 발전방향 = 63
• 1. 세계화와 시민사회운동 = 63
• 2. 지방자치와 시민사회운동 = 69
• 3. 진보적 시민사회운동의 활성화 = 71
• 제5장 결론 = 75
• 참고문헌 = 78