간호사의 건강증진 생활양식과 관련 요인 연구 = Relating Factors and Health Promoting Lifestyle of Hospital Nurses

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of study was to assess how hospital nurses practice their health promoting lifestyle and to identify those affecting factors.
The subjects were 286 nurses working at three general hospitals in Kwang-ju.
The data were collected by self-administered questionnaire from September 1st to September l0th, 1999.
The instruments used in this study were Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile developed by Walker et al., perceived health status scale developed by Ware et al., self-efficacy scale developed by Sherer et al., and social support scale developed by Cohen et al..
The data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and Stepwise Multiple Regression by using the SAS program.
The results of this study were as follows:
1. The mean score of health promoting lifestyle was 2.36, interpersonal support 2.67, self-actualization 2.66, stress management 2.29, nutrition 2.27, exercise 1.92, health responsibility 1.73. Interpersonal support showed the highest score and health responsibility showed the lowest score.
The mean score of perceived health status was 3.07, self-efficacy was 2.62, social support was 2.91.
2. The relationship between general characteristics of subjects and health promoting lifestyle were significant differences according to duty cycle(t=4.15, p=.042), disease experience(t=5.18, p=.O23), monthly income(F=3.13, p=.025), exercise frequency(t=5.31, p=.000), stress relieve method(F=5.98, p=.000), job satisfaction(t=11.44, p=.000), perceived fatigue(F=6.13, p=.002).
3. The relationship between general characteristics of subjects and perceived health status were significant differences according to age(F=3.77, p=.O24), position(F=3.79, p=.023), duty cycle(t=8.53, p=.003), night duty frequency(F'3.66, p=.027), disease experience(t=8.66, p=.003), monthly income(F=4.35, p=.005), job satisfaction(t=17.92, p=.000), perceived fatigue(F=33.58, p=.000).
4. The relationship between general characteristics of subjects and self- efficacy were significant differences according to age(F=3.88, p=.021), position (F=6.18, p=.002), job career(F=6.26, p=.002), duty cycle(t=9.67, p=.002), night duty frequency(F=3.96, p=.020) monthly income(F=5.18, p=.00l), exercise frequency (t=3.22, p=.00l), stress relieve method(F=5.53, p=.000), job satisfaction(t=8.15, p=.004).
5. The relationship between general characteristics of subjects and social support were significant difference according to stress relieve method(F=l.99, p=.040).
6. Health promoting lifestyle was showed significant positive correlations with perceived health status (r=.2190, p=.0002), self-efficacy (r=.5137, p=.000l) and social support (r=.5181, p=.000l).
7. The combination of social support, exercise frequency, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, perceived health status, perceived fatigue, disease experience explained 54.6% of the variance of health promoting lifestyle.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• ABSTRACT = ⅳ
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
• B. 연구의 목적 = 3
• C. 연구문제 및 가설 = 3
• D. 용어의 정의 = 4
• Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 = 6
• A. 건강증진 생활양식 = 6
• B. 지각된 건강상태 = 8
• C. 자기효능감 = 10
• D. 사회적 지지 = 11
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 14
• A. 연구설계 = 14
• B. 연구대상 = 14
• C. 연구도구 = 14
• D. 자료수집방법 = 16
• E. 자료분석 = 16
• F. 연구의 제한점 = 16
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 논의 = 17
• A. 대상자의 일반적 특성 = 17
• B. 주요변수 측정 결과 = 20
• C. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 제 요인들의 차이 = 24
• D. 대상자의 건강증진 생활양식과 제 요인들간의 상관관계 = 31
• E. 대상자의 건강증진 생활양식에 영향을 미치는 관련 요인 분석 = 33
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 35
• A. 결론 = 35
• B. 제언 = 37
• 참고문헌 = 38
• 부록 = 44