區分地上權에 관한 硏究 = (A) study on sectional superficies

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The space above and under the ground, being not fully occupied and applied, precious natural resources, are required to be developed and utilized positively.
As for the rights able to use other owner's any fixed, sectional space layers above and under the ground, application of sectional superficies is concidered to be proper and best. Sectional superficies a kind of superficies (Surfice Rights)that concerns such matters of sectionalizing any fixed ranges of the space above and under the ground, giving rights to users to use the space to own buildings or other facilities, which sometimes is called 'air rights' and 'underground rights'.
However, to make easy to secure rights, to make transactions safe, and to facilitate the establishment of rights concerning the space above and under the ground, nay annexed rights such as easement are desirable to be utilized. And, this system of sectional superficies is short of its history of usage as well as the people's recognition of its habitual pracitce.
But, with regard to such a point of view, if a basic framework of such a system were studied and then, developed, on the premise that the contents of rights and interests should be definite, and its utilization should be facilitated and secured, then its utilization would be more active.
Nowadays, on the central streets of the big cities, demands for the space above and under the ground are daily increasing, resulting in a 'sprawl' phenomenon, and therefore, to control such conflict or disorder, a kind of administratively designed master plan is desirable to be composed concerning space development and in particular, the development of the underground space.
In particular, what the problems are, though existing civil law secures personal(private) ownership wiht a declaration that the influence of land ownership "effectivates the space above and under the ground as long as there go any fair benefits in tis limittation of considerable rights", however, in management between the public usage of the space above and under the ground and the validity of personal ownership as well as in compensation between those two things.
In short, there is no lawful system to regulate such things. However, for example, in Japan, discussion on the subject to give some usage rights for the deepest space under the ground to public enterprises is being ripen.
Finally, concerning the possibility of introduction of the systems of 'air rights' and TDR(Transferable Development Rights) of U.S.A, if wiich are compared witch similar systems of our nation, the following will be good comparisons for future consideration.
With regard to the air rights by a method of 'the artificial ground(floor)', it can be, in combination, applicable to the sectional superficies in our civil law, and with regard to the air rights by a method of 'grafting', if certain sectional ownership by "the laws concerning the ownership of the assembled building and its management" were bettered and utilized, it should be well combinated with existing relative laws.
However, in the case by the method of 'grafting', whether sectional superficies can be applicable, or not, depends entirely on how to manage it. of course, to materialize that, some insufficient points of the recognition of laws and systems should be supplemented.
Next, with regard to TDR systedm if the limittation of volume rates in the law of city-planning and the Building Standard Act and its mitigating system should be studied more, and the system of sectional superficies should be efficiently utilized, the purpose or purport of this system would be achieved. Additionally, to enable to establish the personal rights of the real right, i.e., secional superficies, in the government's public space above and under the ground, reexamination on the 20th Article of the Law of the Government's Properites, etc. is of reguired.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = 5
• 第1章 序論 = 11
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 11
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 13
• 第2章 區分地上權에 관한 一般論 = 17
• 第1節 序言 = 17
• Ⅰ. 區分地上權制度 = 17
• Ⅱ. 區分地上權의 法律的性質 = 21
• 第2節 各國의 地上權에 立法例 = 24
• Ⅰ. 序言 = 24
• Ⅱ. 獨逸民法 = 26
• Ⅲ. 스위스 民法 = 28
• Ⅳ. 프랑스의 民法 = 28
• Ⅴ. 英國法 = 29
• Ⅵ. 日本 民法 = 31
• Ⅶ. 結言 = 33
• 第3節 區分地上權의 取得 = 34
• Ⅰ. 法律行爲에 의한 取得 = 34
• Ⅱ. 法律行爲에 의하지 않은 取得 = 41
• 第4節 區分地上權設定登記申請 = 43
• Ⅰ. 序言 = 43
• Ⅱ. 書式 = 44
• Ⅲ. 記載事項 = 44
• Ⅳ. 附屬書類 = 48
• 第5節 區分地上權의 客體 = 48
• Ⅰ. 土地의 上下의 範圍 = 48
• Ⅱ. 그 밖의 問題點 = 49
• 第6節 區分地上權의 效力 = 56
• Ⅰ. 一定範圍의 土地를 使用할 權利 = 56
• Ⅱ. 區分地上權者의 投下資本의 回收 = 63
• Ⅲ. 地料關係 = 70
• 第7節 區分地上權의 存續期間 = 76
• Ⅰ. 設定行爲로써 存續期間을 정하지 않은 경우 = 76
• Ⅱ. 設定行爲로써 存續期間을 정하는 경우 = 77
• Ⅲ. 存續期間의 强制規定性 = 83
• 第8節 區分地上權의 消滅 = 84
• Ⅰ. 區分地上權의 消滅事由 = 84
• Ⅱ. 區分地上權設定者의 消滅請求 = 84
• Ⅲ. 區分地上權의 抛棄 = 87
• Ⅳ. 區分地上權消滅事由의 約定 = 88
• Ⅴ. 區分地上權消滅의 效果 = 89
• 第9節 法定區分地上權 = 90
• Ⅰ. 序言 = 90
• Ⅱ. 理論的 根據 = 96
• Ⅲ. 法定地上權制度의 歸趨 = 98
• Ⅳ. 法定區分 地上權의 成立 = 99
• Ⅴ. 法定(區分)地上權의 內容 = 110
• Ⅵ. 法定(區分)地上權의 公示 = 112
• Ⅶ. 法定(區分)地上權의 處分과 消滅 = 112
• 第3章 區分層으로서의 地下 및 空間과 區分地上權 = 115
• 第1節 地下空間의 開發과 그 利用權 = 115
• Ⅰ. 序言 = 115
• 1. 地下利用의 沿革 = 115
• 2. 地下空間開發利用의 權原 = 123
• 3. 地下空間利用에 관한 立法例 = 133
• Ⅱ. 地下空間利用權의 法的諸問題 = 151
• 1. 地下街에 있어서의 法律問題 = 151
• 2. 大深度地下鐵道의 構想과 法的問題 = 159
• 3. 地下利用에 관한 行政法上의 規制 = 174
• 4. 公權力에 의한 私有地의 地下利用에 대한 補償 問題 = 181
• 5. 地下空間利用의 Sprawl화에 대한 法政策的 對應 = 190
• Ⅲ. 結言(地下空間利用과 區分地上權) = 192
• 第2節 區分地上權으로서의 空中權問題 = 194
• Ⅰ. 序言 = 194
• 1. 土地의 立體的利用 = 194
• 2. 空中利用의 態壤 = 196
• Ⅱ. 空中權 = 197
• 1. 空中權의 意義 = 197
• 2. 空中權의 成立과 目的 = 199
• 3. 空中權의 取得方法과 登記 = 203
• 4. 空中權의 價格 = 209
• 5. 空中權利用의 具體的事例 = 211
• Ⅲ. 移轉可能한 開發權(TDR) = 219
• 1. 土地와 開發權 = 219
• 2. TDR의 意義 = 223
• 3. TDR의 起源과 目的 = 225
• 4. TDR의 財産性 = 228
• 5. TDR의 取得方法과 登記 = 231
• 6. TDR의 價格 = 234
• 7. TDR制度의 事例 = 236
• Ⅳ. 區分地上權과 美國의 空中權 = 238
• 1. 序言 = 238
• 2. 空中權과 우리나라의 區分地上權 등 法制 = 239
• 3. 移轉可能한 開發權(TDR)의 適用 = 246
• Ⅴ. 結言 = 248
• 第4章 結論 = 251
• 參考文獻 = 253
• abstract = 262