RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    우리나라 老人의 所得保障制度에 관한 硏究 : 國民年金 및 生活保護 制度를 中心으로 = (A) study on older people's income security in Korea : focused on the national pension system and the livelihood aid system

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T4373031

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Our country is faced with aging society owing to the expanded longevity continuously since the 1960s. A long time ago, the elderly used to be respected and live a happy and comfortable life thanks to the traditional family system.
    As our country has been rapidly industrialized and the traditional familism society has collapsed, the family support function has weaken.
    As the result, the elderly problem has become one of the serious social problem.
    Everyone needs regular income to live happily as a human being, especially in the case of the aged, they require additional costs which is resulted from the aging Above all, the economic factor is the most important in the aged welfare field.
    After I identify the current scene of the national pension and the livelihood aid system, I will suggest that the aged who worked very hard to achieve our economic growth should be given at least regular income as the complementary.
    The suggestions are as follows:
    1. The national pension system
    First, the specified pension and the national pension should be combined by expanding welfare recipients pension and then a poor workplace where five workers work at least and those who run their own stores in a city should be include as a necessary eligibility to all of people.
    Second, as far as the cost of allowance is increased, the level should be upgraded to the degree of ILO recommendational standards. Also the receipts of pension must receive much more than the lowest living cost. No paid-pension system should be accomplished for the eldery, who are not capable to support themselves economically.
    Third, improving the delivery system, we can seek the efficiency and consistency by combining each of the pension system.
    Fourth, as a means of finance supply, the pension insurance is not assisted by the government under the principle of user charges. Therefore we must consider plans which the pension cost can be shared with the government. the government's finance can be used as the fund operation, on the basis of "Public Funds Management Law" However, the system reform should be made for the operation of pension funds independently. Systematical instruments which are able to reflect the insured's opinion should be provided.
    2. The livelihood aid system for the aged.
    First, benefits should be given much more than the lowest living cost through the expanded quota standard.
    Second, by the actualization of grant the lowest living cost must be tested yearly and the support level ought to be decided with the resulted standard and supplemental grant should be practiced.
    Third, in order to improve and complement the matters involved in public welfare delivery system, the health welfare office must be established and operated as the improvement of the delivery system.
    Fourth, to enhance the finance supply system, private welfare resources must be developed and cultivated as a means of fiance supply besides the government budget, that is, the authority should allow existing social welfare facilities and corporations to raise community chest. And the government should support that they can use that welfare funds.
    번역하기

    Our country is faced with aging society owing to the expanded longevity continuously since the 1960s. A long time ago, the elderly used to be respected and live a happy and comfortable life thanks to the traditional family system. As our country has ...

    Our country is faced with aging society owing to the expanded longevity continuously since the 1960s. A long time ago, the elderly used to be respected and live a happy and comfortable life thanks to the traditional family system.
    As our country has been rapidly industrialized and the traditional familism society has collapsed, the family support function has weaken.
    As the result, the elderly problem has become one of the serious social problem.
    Everyone needs regular income to live happily as a human being, especially in the case of the aged, they require additional costs which is resulted from the aging Above all, the economic factor is the most important in the aged welfare field.
    After I identify the current scene of the national pension and the livelihood aid system, I will suggest that the aged who worked very hard to achieve our economic growth should be given at least regular income as the complementary.
    The suggestions are as follows:
    1. The national pension system
    First, the specified pension and the national pension should be combined by expanding welfare recipients pension and then a poor workplace where five workers work at least and those who run their own stores in a city should be include as a necessary eligibility to all of people.
    Second, as far as the cost of allowance is increased, the level should be upgraded to the degree of ILO recommendational standards. Also the receipts of pension must receive much more than the lowest living cost. No paid-pension system should be accomplished for the eldery, who are not capable to support themselves economically.
    Third, improving the delivery system, we can seek the efficiency and consistency by combining each of the pension system.
    Fourth, as a means of finance supply, the pension insurance is not assisted by the government under the principle of user charges. Therefore we must consider plans which the pension cost can be shared with the government. the government's finance can be used as the fund operation, on the basis of "Public Funds Management Law" However, the system reform should be made for the operation of pension funds independently. Systematical instruments which are able to reflect the insured's opinion should be provided.
    2. The livelihood aid system for the aged.
    First, benefits should be given much more than the lowest living cost through the expanded quota standard.
    Second, by the actualization of grant the lowest living cost must be tested yearly and the support level ought to be decided with the resulted standard and supplemental grant should be practiced.
    Third, in order to improve and complement the matters involved in public welfare delivery system, the health welfare office must be established and operated as the improvement of the delivery system.
    Fourth, to enhance the finance supply system, private welfare resources must be developed and cultivated as a means of fiance supply besides the government budget, that is, the authority should allow existing social welfare facilities and corporations to raise community chest. And the government should support that they can use that welfare funds.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제제기 및 연구 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제제기 및 연구 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 2
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 4
    • 1. 노인복지의 개념 = 4
    • 2. 노인문제와 소득보장 = 7
    • 1) 노인문제의 발생요인 = 7
    • 2) 노인소득보장의 필요성 = 12
    • 3. 각국의 노인소득보장제도 = 14
    • 1) 영국 = 15
    • 2) 미국 = 16
    • 3) 일본 = 18
    • 4) 스웨덴 = 19
    • 4. 선행연구 고찰 = 22
    • 5. 분석 틀 = 25
    • III. 우리나라 노인 소득보장제도의 현황 및 문제점 = 28
    • 1. 국민연금제도 = 28
    • 1) 할당기초(적용대상) = 28
    • 2) 급여형태(급여종류) = 31
    • 3) 전달체계 = 36
    • 4) 재정지원(재원조달) = 39
    • 2. 노인 생활보호제도 = 43
    • 1) 할당기초 (적용대상) = 43
    • 2) 급여형태 (급여종류) = 45
    • 3) 전달체계 = 47
    • 4) 재정지원(재원조달) = 50
    • IV. 우리나라 노인 소득보장제도의 개선방안 = 52
    • 1. 국민연금제도 = 52
    • 1) 할당기초 (적용대상) = 52
    • 2) 급여형태 (급여종류) = 53
    • 3) 전달체계 = 54
    • 4) 재정지원 (재원조달) = 56
    • 2. 노인 생활보호제도 = 58
    • 1) 할당기초 (적용대상) = 58
    • 2) 급여형태 (급여종류) = 59
    • 3) 전달체계 = 61
    • 4) 재정지원 (재원조달) = 64
    • V. 요약및 결론 = 66
    • 참고문헌 = 70
    • ABSTRACT = 74
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼