RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      소비자 인식기반 ESG 경영 척도 개발 연구 = A Study on the Development of Consumer Based ESG Scale

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16394773

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As uncertainties in the business environment increase due to COVID-19, companies are interested in ESG management as a strategy to overcome this. In addition, unlike the existing consumption environment, today's consumption environment values value consumption reflecting consumers' beliefs and values, and companies' management activities also focus on consumer value consumption. As the concept of value consumption expressed as mining-out emerged as a new consumption trend, companies began to recognize and evaluate ESG management in the non-financial aspect, which had been recognized as external costs. However, existing ESG management research has been mainly conducted from an investor's point of view, especially focusing on corporate financial performance or corporate value, and has presented the effects of ESG management. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop an ESG management scale based on consumer perception. Specifically, this study aims to measure how consumers perceive a company's ESG management activities and expand the measured ESG management factors to the marketing area.

      In order to achieve the purpose of this study, a consumer awareness-based ESG scale was developed according to Churchill (1979)'s multi-item scale development process. In Study 1, the measurement concept was derived and preliminary stages were conducted during the scale development process. This researcher defined the concept of consumer awareness-based ESG management through previous studies and created preliminary questions through metrics such as KEJI Index, Korea Corporate Governance Service(KCGS) ESG evaluation index, Bloombrg ESG evaluation index, and K-ESG evaluation index. A total of 91 initial measurement items were derived through in-depth interviews with FGI and experts for the first measurement items.

      The first data collection was conducted on 200 adults, and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed using the SPSS 27.0 and LISREL 8.3 programs. The optimal factor was derived by performing a competition model verification on the derived factors and measurement items. As a result, the environment (E) dimension was composed of three sub-dimensions, and the three sub-dimensions were derived as nine questions of 'environmental risk management report', four questions of 'environmental management pursuit activity', and three questions of 'response to climate change'. The social (S) dimension consisted of four sub-dimensions, and the three sub-dimensions were derived from six questions of 'community', five questions of 'stakeholders', five questions of 'employment equality', and four questions of 'protection of consumer rights'. The governance (G) dimension was composed of four sub-dimensions, and the four sub-dimensions were derived into five questions of 'corporate fairness', five questions of 'shareholders', two questions of 'corporate soundness', and two questions of 'social director'. The final result was derived as a total of 50 questions.

      In Study 2, this stage was carried out among the scale development stages. To this end, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted through secondary data collection for 280 adults, and then the validity of interest was verified through model verification. As a result of the verification, consumer-based ESG management was found to have a positive (+) effect on corporate trust and corporate image, confirming the validity of the interest.

      This study is an early study that developed an ESG management scale based on consumer perception, and has academic significance in that it presents a consumer-centered ESG marketing measurement method by applying factors that constitute ESG management in terms of consumers.
      번역하기

      As uncertainties in the business environment increase due to COVID-19, companies are interested in ESG management as a strategy to overcome this. In addition, unlike the existing consumption environment, today's consumption environment values value co...

      As uncertainties in the business environment increase due to COVID-19, companies are interested in ESG management as a strategy to overcome this. In addition, unlike the existing consumption environment, today's consumption environment values value consumption reflecting consumers' beliefs and values, and companies' management activities also focus on consumer value consumption. As the concept of value consumption expressed as mining-out emerged as a new consumption trend, companies began to recognize and evaluate ESG management in the non-financial aspect, which had been recognized as external costs. However, existing ESG management research has been mainly conducted from an investor's point of view, especially focusing on corporate financial performance or corporate value, and has presented the effects of ESG management. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop an ESG management scale based on consumer perception. Specifically, this study aims to measure how consumers perceive a company's ESG management activities and expand the measured ESG management factors to the marketing area.

      In order to achieve the purpose of this study, a consumer awareness-based ESG scale was developed according to Churchill (1979)'s multi-item scale development process. In Study 1, the measurement concept was derived and preliminary stages were conducted during the scale development process. This researcher defined the concept of consumer awareness-based ESG management through previous studies and created preliminary questions through metrics such as KEJI Index, Korea Corporate Governance Service(KCGS) ESG evaluation index, Bloombrg ESG evaluation index, and K-ESG evaluation index. A total of 91 initial measurement items were derived through in-depth interviews with FGI and experts for the first measurement items.

      The first data collection was conducted on 200 adults, and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed using the SPSS 27.0 and LISREL 8.3 programs. The optimal factor was derived by performing a competition model verification on the derived factors and measurement items. As a result, the environment (E) dimension was composed of three sub-dimensions, and the three sub-dimensions were derived as nine questions of 'environmental risk management report', four questions of 'environmental management pursuit activity', and three questions of 'response to climate change'. The social (S) dimension consisted of four sub-dimensions, and the three sub-dimensions were derived from six questions of 'community', five questions of 'stakeholders', five questions of 'employment equality', and four questions of 'protection of consumer rights'. The governance (G) dimension was composed of four sub-dimensions, and the four sub-dimensions were derived into five questions of 'corporate fairness', five questions of 'shareholders', two questions of 'corporate soundness', and two questions of 'social director'. The final result was derived as a total of 50 questions.

      In Study 2, this stage was carried out among the scale development stages. To this end, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted through secondary data collection for 280 adults, and then the validity of interest was verified through model verification. As a result of the verification, consumer-based ESG management was found to have a positive (+) effect on corporate trust and corporate image, confirming the validity of the interest.

      This study is an early study that developed an ESG management scale based on consumer perception, and has academic significance in that it presents a consumer-centered ESG marketing measurement method by applying factors that constitute ESG management in terms of consumers.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 제1절 문제제기와 연구목적 1
      • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 7
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 9
      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 제1절 문제제기와 연구목적 1
      • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 7
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 9
      • 제1절 가치소비 9
      • 제2절 ESG 경영 12
      • 제3절 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 25
      • 제4절 공유가치창출(CSV) 30
      • 제5절 지속가능경영 34
      • 제3장 연구 1(척도개발) 37
      • 제1절 1차 조사를 위한 최초 항목 개발 39
      • 제2절 1차 자료 수집 및 척도 강화 47
      • 제3절 경쟁모형을 통한 적합성 검증 61
      • 제4장 연구2(이해타당도 검증) 70
      • 제1절 연구가설의 설정 70
      • 제2절 표본설계와 자료 수집 75
      • 제3절 변수측정 75
      • 제4절 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석 79
      • 제5절 가설검증 83
      • 제5장 결론 84
      • 제1절 연구결과 요약 및 시사점 84
      • 제2절 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구 90
      • 참고문헌 91
      • 설문지 106
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. , 환경부, 지속가능경영 추진 가이드라인: 환경측면을 중심으로, , 2005

      2. 미닝아웃 바람, 오수연, 마케팅, 53(11), 55-61, , 2019

      3. CSR마케팅의 이해, 안대천, 북넷, , 2016

      4. 공변량 구조분석, 이순목, 성원사, 서울, , 1990

      5. 트렌드 코리아 2018, 이준영, 최지혜, 이수진, 김난도, 전미영, 서유현, 이향은, 김서영, 미래의창, , 2017

      6. Innovating for Shared Value ,, Pfitzer , M. , Bockstette , V. and Stamp , M., 91 , 100-107 ., , 2013

      7. The Ecosystem of Shared Value, Kramer , M. R. and Pfitzer , M. W., 94 ( 10 ) , 80-89 ., , 2016

      8. 기업의 ESG와 재무성과, 장승욱, 김용현, 재무관리연구, 30(1), 131-152, , 2013

      9. Risk as a Determinant of Trust ,, Koller, 9 ( 4 ) , 265-276 ., , 1988

      10. 인도의 CSR 정책과 시사점, 박민준, 조동준, 박지수, 김상환, KOTRA Global Market Report, 13(125), 1-35, , 2013

      1. , 환경부, 지속가능경영 추진 가이드라인: 환경측면을 중심으로, , 2005

      2. 미닝아웃 바람, 오수연, 마케팅, 53(11), 55-61, , 2019

      3. CSR마케팅의 이해, 안대천, 북넷, , 2016

      4. 공변량 구조분석, 이순목, 성원사, 서울, , 1990

      5. 트렌드 코리아 2018, 이준영, 최지혜, 이수진, 김난도, 전미영, 서유현, 이향은, 김서영, 미래의창, , 2017

      6. Innovating for Shared Value ,, Pfitzer , M. , Bockstette , V. and Stamp , M., 91 , 100-107 ., , 2013

      7. The Ecosystem of Shared Value, Kramer , M. R. and Pfitzer , M. W., 94 ( 10 ) , 80-89 ., , 2016

      8. 기업의 ESG와 재무성과, 장승욱, 김용현, 재무관리연구, 30(1), 131-152, , 2013

      9. Risk as a Determinant of Trust ,, Koller, 9 ( 4 ) , 265-276 ., , 1988

      10. 인도의 CSR 정책과 시사점, 박민준, 조동준, 박지수, 김상환, KOTRA Global Market Report, 13(125), 1-35, , 2013

      11. How competitive forces shape strategy, Porter , M. E., 57 ( 2 ) , 137-145 ., , 1979

      12. 지속가능경영의 현황과 과제, 김재은, 신철호, 임금연구, 가을호, 72-81, , 2008

      13. Consumer Behavior And Marketing Strategy, Peter , P. J . And J. C. Olson, 2Nd Edition, , 1990

      14. A framework for business sustainability ., Pojasek , R. B, 17 ( 2 ) , 81-88, , 2007

      15. Sustainability and Place-based Enterprise, Shrivastava , P. and Kennelly , J . J ., 26 ( 1 ) , 83-101 ., , 2013

      16. A Framework for Marketing Image Management, Barich , H. , and Kotler , P., 32 ( 2 ) , 94 ., , 1991

      17. The imperatives of sustainable development, Holden , E. , Linnerud , K. and Banister , D., 25 ( 3 ) , 213-226 ., , 2017

      18. 소비자가 본 ESG와 친환경 소비행동,, 손광표, 황원경, KB금융지주 경 영연구소, , 2021

      19. Corporate Esg And Long-Run Financial Performance, Jang , S. W. , And Y. H. Kim, 30 ( 1 ) , , 131-152 ., , 2013

      20. Creating Shared Value : How to Reinvent Capitalism, Porter M. E. , and Kramer , M. R., 89 ( 1 ) , 4-17 ., , 2011

      21. Creating and Capturing Value : Strategic Corporate, McWilliams and Siegel, 37 ( 5 ) , 1480-1495 ., , 2011

      22. ESG 활동의 효과와 기업의 재무적 특성, 정무권, 강원 , 한국증권학회지, 49(5), 681-707,

      23. 공유가치창출을 실현하는 사회적기업, 조상미, 김경화, 정수정, 한국경영 학회, 18(4), 241-265, , 2014

      24. 소비가치 측정을 위한 척 도개발 연구, 여정성, 김난도, 구명진, 최현자, 김소연, 나종연, 소비자학연구, 26(6), 235-266, , 2015

      25. 소비자가 진화한다: 시장 권력의 중심, 김용섭, 전은경, 김영사, , 2008

      26. Marketing: Concepts and strategies, Houghton Mifflin, Ferrell, O. C., Pride, W. M., Dibb, S., Simkin, L., (확인해보기), , 2005

      27. Organization , Trust and Control : A Realist Analysis, Reed , M . I, 22 ( 2 ) , 201-228, , 2001

      28. 소비자 관점에서 본 기업 ESG경영의 미래,, 유수현, 소비자정책동향, 113, 1-20, , 2021

      29. 한 일 기업의 전략적 CSR 활동과 기업성과, 변선영, 김진욱, 국제 경영연구, 22(1), 83-110, , 2011

      30. The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model, Wartick , S. L. , and Cochran , P. L., 10 ( 4 ) , 758-769 ., , 1985

      31. .Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities ?, Davis K., 2 ( 3 ) , 70-76 ., , 1960

      32. 소비자 관계몰입의 다차원성에 관한 연구,, 이수진, 한국의류학회지, 28(3), 527-538, , 2004

      33. 우리나라 윤리적 소비자에 대한 사례연구,, 송인숙, 홍연금, 소비문화연 구, 13(2), 1-25, , 2010

      34. 가치소비 장려를 위한 플랫폼 서비스 연구,, 안성희, 김지연, 한국HCI학회 학술대회, 648-652, , 2021

      35. Assessing Goodness of Fit : Is Parsimony always Desirable ?, Marsh , H. W. and K. T. Hau, 64 , 364-390 ., , 1996

      36. An Empirical Study On The Value Relevance Of Esg Information, Na , Y. , and W. Leem, 26 ( 4 ) , 439-467 ., , 2011

      37. An Exploration Of Values In Ethical Consumer Decision Making, Shaw , Deirdre , Grehan , Emma , Shiu , Edward , Hassan , Louiseand Jennifer Thomson, 4 ( 3 ) , 185-200 ., , 2005

      38. Corporate Social Responsibility : A Three-Domain Approach '', Schwartz , M.S . and Carroll , A.B, 13 ( 4 ) , 503-530 ., , 2003

      39. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Carroll , A . B, 4 ( 4 ) , 497-505 ., , 1979

      40. “CSV와 CSR간의 진정성과 정당성 지 각 비교,”, 이성근, 유문주, 허희영, 문화산업연구, 16(4), 65-77, , 2016

      41. Price Impact Of Esg Scores : Evidence From Korean Retail Firms, Son , S. H. , And J. H. Lee, 17 ( 7 ) , 55-63 ., , 2019

      42. 공유가치창출 전략백서: (3) CSV 전략과 측정방법, 김태영, Impact Business Review, , 2014

      43. 기업이미지 제고 관리 전략에 대한 실증적 연구, 김청수, 구경영, 한국 컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(3), 193-201, , 2012

      44. 기업가 정신과 공유가치 창출에 관한 사례연 구,, 이민재, 김명숙, 정진섭, 전문경영인연구, 19(2), 2-307, , 2016

      45. A Paradigm For Developing Better Measurers Of Marketing Constructs, Churchill , Gilbert A, 16 ( Feb ) , 66-73, , 1979

      46. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders, Barnea , A. , & Rubin , A ., Journal of business ethics, 97(1), 71-86. (비교), , 2010

      47. ESG(환경, 사회, 지배구조)와 조세제도에 관한 연구, 태정림, 조세연구, 21(2), 135-164, , 2021

      48. 소비자의 ESG경영요구가 ESG경영지지에 미치는 영향, 이성호, 남정민, 유현경, Entrepreneurship & ESG연구, 1(2), 1-24, , 2021

      49. 한국기업 CSR활동의 공유가치창출에 관한 실증연구, Tsog Khulan, 김세중, 박의범, 로고스경영연구, 10(4), 1-28, , 2012

      50. 공유가치창출 (CSV) 에 관한 국내 문헌 분석 및 제언,, 전달영, 임종혁, 사회적경제와 정책연구, 8(1), 53-87, , 2018

      51. 해외 금융기관의 지속가능경영 추진 배경과 시사점, 윤경수, KDB 산업 은행 산은조사월보, (779), 22-37, , 2020

      52. Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research Get access Arrow, Bagozzi , R. P. and Youjae Yi, 17 ( 4 ) , 426 ? 439, , 1991

      53. An Examination of the Natuer of Trust ing Buyer ? seller Relationships, Doney , P. M. and Cannon , J. P., 61 ( 2 ) , 35-51 ., , 1997

      54. Corporate social Responsibility and Marketing : An Integrative Framework, Maignan , I. , and Ferrell , O. C., 32 ( 1 ) , 3 ? 19, , 2004

      55. 경영학회가 제안하는 공유가치 창출 전략: CSR에서 CSV로, 박흥수, 이장우, 유창조, 전병준, 오명열, 박영사, , 2014

      56. “지속가능경영이 공공기관 성과에 미치는 영향 연구”, 김혜숙, 이화여자 대학교 대학원, 박사학위, , 2013

      57. 한 중 유통기업의 ESG 경 영에 대한 2030 소비자 인식 연구, 김수연, 백지연, 문주옥, 오우흠, 이설, 구혜경, 생활과학연구논총, 25(2), 55-75, , 2021

      58. Business sustainability research : A theoretical and integrated perspective, Rezaee , Z, 36 , 48-64, , 2016

      59. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations : An organizing framework, Rugman , A. M. , and Verbeke , A ., 19 ( 4 ) , 363-375 ., , 1998

      60. 기업의 경제적 사회책임 활동과 기업이미지에 관한 연구,, 우소영, 배현미, 이준일, 국제지역연구, 11(3), 868-891, , 2007

      61. The Ontogeny of Twilight Migration Patterns in Grunts ( Pisces : Haemulidae ), Helfman , G. S. , Meyer , J. L. , and McFarland , W. N., 30 ( 2 ) , 317-326 ., , 1982

      62. The Signaling Effect Of Corporate Social Responsibility In Emerging Economies, Su , W. , Peng , M. W. , Tan , W. , and Cheung , Y. L., 134 ( 3 ) , 479-491, , 2016

      63. 김기업의 ESG 노력과 재무성과의 선후행 관계: 탐색적 연구,, 김범석, 민재형, 한국생산관리학회지, 27(4), 513-538, , 2016

      64. How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined : An Ana lysis of 37 Definitions, Dahlsrud , A, 15 ( 1 ) , 1-13, , 2008

      65. `` Giving Firms an `` E '' for Effort : Consumer Responses to High-Effort Firms, Morales , A. C., 31 ( 4 ) , 806-812 ., , 2005

      66. 도덕적 정체성이 기부의도에 미치는 심리적 메커니즘 고찰,, 오민정, 박종철, 소비문화연구, 15(4), 63-76. (인용 이걸로 바꾸기), , 2012

      67. Revisiting the Role of “ Shared Value ” in the Business-Society Relationship, Aakhus , M. and B. Bzdak, 31 ( 2 ) , 231-246 ., , 2012

      68. Effect of Non-Financial Information on Firm Performance : Focusing on ESG Score ,, Leem , W., 86 , 119-144 ., , 2019

      69. Reliability Of Non-Financial Information : An Analysis Of Sustainability Reporting, Choi , J. H. , D. H. Yang , H. S. Ryu , And L. Jin, 46 ( 4 ) , 1157-1200 ., , 2017

      70. 공유가치창출(CSV)관점에서 본 CJ제일제당의 동반성장 추진사례, 박병진, 김도희, Korea Business Review, 17(2), 73-99, , 2013

      71. 비재무적 정보가 기업성과에 미치는 영향: ESG 점수를 중심으로, 임욱빈, 국제회계연구, 86, 119`144, , 2019

      72. Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach, Anderson , James C. and Gerbing , David W., 103 ( 3 ) , 411-423 ., , 1988

      73. Corporate social performance , analyst stock recommendations , and firm future returns, Luo , X. , Wang , H. , Raithel , S. , and Zheng , Q ., 36 ( 1 ) , 123-136 ., , 2015

      74. 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 공유가치창출(CSV)의 효과에 관한 연구,, 이은주, 윤각, 광고학연구, 25(2), 53-72, , 2014

      75. 소비자의 윤리적 상품에 대한 태도 및 구매의도의 관련요인 분석, 허은정, 소비자학 연구, 22(2), 89-111, , 2011

      76. Customers ' Values , Beliefs on Sustainable Corporate Performance , and Buying Behavior, Collins , C. M. , Steg , L. , and Koning , M . A, 24 ( 6 ) , 555-577, , 2007

      77. Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical : Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability, Richardson B J, 87 ( 4 ) , 555-572, , 2009

      78. Communicating CSR and Business Identity in the Chemical Industry through Mission Slogans, Verboven , H., 74 ( 4 ) , 415-431 ., , 2011

      79. Foundations of ESG Investing : How ESG Affects Equity Valuation , Risk , and Performance, Giese , G. , L. Lee , D. Melas , Z. Nagy and Nishikawa , L., 45 ( 5 ) , 69-83 ., , 2019

      80. 기업의 재무상태에 따른 비재무적 책임 향상 노력의 차 별적 효과,, 민재형, 김범석, 경영과학, 36(1), 17-35, , 2019

      81. ESG and Financial Performance : Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies, Friede , G. , T. Busch , and A. Bassen, 5 , 210 ? 233, , 2015

      82. 대기업과 중소기업의 협력방안 공유가치창출(CSV) 관점 을 중심으로,, 박광태, 박진수, 생산성논집, 29(2), 253-275, , 2015

      83. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value : The Role of Customer Awareness, Servaes , H. , and A. Tamayo, 59 ( 5 ) , 1045-1061 ., , 2013

      84. Conceptual Framework of Value Creation through CSR in Separate Member of Value Creation Chain, Jonikas , D., 21 ( 21 ) 69-78, , 2013

      85. Enhancing Market Valuation Of ESG Performance : Is Integrated Reporting Keeping Its Promise ?, Mervelskemper , L. , And D. Streit, 26 ( 4 ) , 536-549 ., , 2017

      86. Strategy and society : The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Porter , M. E. , and Kramer , M. R., 84 ( 12 ) , 78-92 ., , 2006

      87. Resiliency Of Environmental And Social Stocks : An Analysis Of The Exogenous Covid-19 Market Crash, Albuquerque , R. , Koskinen , Y. , Yang , S. , & Zhang , C., 9 ( 3 ) , 593-621, , 2020

      88. 레스토랑의 친환경 경영활동이 브랜드이미지와 구매의도에 미치 는 영향,, 김종훈, 동북아관광연구, 12(2), 213-232, , 2016

      89. Strategic Management of the Socially Responsible Firm : Integrating Management and Marketing Theory, Murray , K. B. and Montanari , J. R., 11 ( 4 ) , 815-82, , 1986

      90. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability, Aupperle , K. E. , Carroll , A . B. and Hatfield , J. D., 28 ( 2 ) , 446-463 ., , 1985

      91. Corporate Social Responsibility In Europe And The Us : Insights From Businesses ’ Self-Presentations, Maignan , I. , and Ralston , D . A, 33 ( 3 ) , 497-514, , 2002

      92. Corporate sustainability and responsibility : creating value for business , society and the environment, Camilleri , M. A, 2 ( 1 ) , 59-74, , 2017

      93. The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance : The Role of Brand Loyalty, Chauchuri , A. , and Holbrook , M . B, 65 ( 2 ) , 81-93, , 2001

      94. Empirical Study On Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility And Financial Performance In Korea, Han , J. , J. Hyun , And J. Yu, 1 , 61-76, , 2016

      95. Expanding the Visiong of Industrialorganizational Psychology Contributions ot Environmental Sustainability, Dubois , C. L. and Dubois , D . A, 5 ( 4 ) , 480-483 ., , 2012

      96. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility : Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Carroll , A . B, 34 ( 4 ) , 39-48, , 1991

      97. 식품 서비스 기업의 공유가치창출(CSV) 활동이 소비자의 구매 의도에 미치는 영향, 정윤희, 함선옥, 김창식, 관광레저연구, 30(6), 361-379, , 2018

      98. 기업의 ESG 활동이 기업 이미지, 지각된 가격 공정성 및 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향, 박윤나, 한상린, 경영학연구, 50(3), 643-664, , 2021

      99. Corporate Social Responsibility Practices , Corporate Identity , And Purchase Intention : A Dual-Process Model, David , P. , Kline , S. , and Dai , Y, 17 ( 3 ) , 291-313, , 2005

      100. The Association Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance : The Paradox of Social Cost, Pava , M. J. Krausz, 15 ( 3 ) , 321-357, , 1996

      101. The Effect of Advertising on Brand Awareness and Perceived Quality : An Empirical Investigation Using Panel Data, Clark , C. R. , Doraszelski , U. and Draganska , M., 7 ( 2 ) , 207-236 ., , 2009

      102. 기업의 ESG 역량과 기업가치의 관계에 대한 연구: 소비자인지의 조절 효과를 중심으로, 김병도, 석준희, 김양희, 경영학연구, 50(6), 1571-1593, , 2021

      103. An Investigation into Sustainable Product Conceptualization Using a Design Knowledge Hierarchy and Hopfield Network, Yan , W. , Chen , C. H. , and Chang , W., 56 ( 4 ) , 1617-1626 ., , 2009

      104. Relationships between Providers and Users of Market Research : The Dynamics of Trust within and between Organizations, Moorman , Zaltman , Deshpande, 29 ( 3 ) , 314-328, , 1992

      105. `` A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns '', Sethi , S. P., 4 ( 1 ) , 63-74 ., , 1979

      106. Relating Environmental , Social , and Governance Scores and Sustainability Performances of Firms : An Empirical Analysis, Rajesh , R. , and Rajendran , C., 29 ( 3 ) , 1247-1267 ., , 2020

      107. 기업의 ESG 수준과 외국인투자자 비중과의 관계: 규제위험 노출수 준에 따른 투자자 민감도, 이재혁, 곽배성, 전략경영연구, 24(1), 35-66, , 2021

      108. Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives : Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project, Ben-Amar , W. , M. Chang and P. McIlkenny, 142 , 369 ? 383, , 2017

      109. 지속가능경영 연구의 현황 및 발전방향: ESG 평가지표 를 중심으로, 전략경영연구, 23(2), 65-92, 이정기, 이재혁, (본문에서 2021 지우기), , 2020

      110. The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Product and Corporate Evaluation : The Mediating Role of Trust, Lee , H. J. , and J. C. Park, 24 ( 1 ) , 231-250 ., , 2009

      111. 스포츠용품기업의 친환경 경영활동이 브랜드이미지, 지각된 품 질, 구매의도에 미치는 영향,, 허철무, 한국체육과학회지, 25(6), 845-860, , 2016

      112. Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility ? The role of institutions , information , and legitimacy, Doh , J .P. , Howton , S. D. , Howton , S. W. , and Siegel , D. S., 36 ( 6 ) , 1461-1485 ., , 2010

      113. International retailers ' strategic responses to institutional environment of emerging market : Multiple case studies in China, Cao , L. and Pederzoli , D., 41 ( 4 ) , 289-310 ., , 2013

      114. 외식기업의 친환경 경영 활동, 친환경적 태도, 지각된 소비자 효율성이 구매 의도에 미치는 영향, 류을순, 서상원, 관광연구저널, 29(11), 87-100, , 2015

      115. 제품 인증마크가 소비자의 제품선택에 미치는 영향 비교 연구: 한국과 중국 대학생 소비자를 대상으로,, 이영미, 박윤서, 김용식, 한국콘텐츠학 회논문지, 17(8), 162-174, , 2017

      116. “항공사의 친환경 경영활동이 기업신뢰, 브랜드이미지 및 고객시민 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 한민아, 박종우, 글로벌경영학회지, 17(2), 31-53, , 2020

      117. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conference between Owners, Social Performance Metrics Conference, Haas Center for Responsible Business, A. Rubin, Barnea, A., (비교), , 2005

      118. Larcker, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50, D. E, Fornell, C., (본문에서 1983년-1981년으로 바꾸기), , 1981

      119. 기업 윤리성, CSR 일관성, CSR 적합성이 CSR 진정성 인 식에 미치는 영향 반기업 정서의 조절 효과를 중심으로,, 윤영민, 강귀영, 한국광고홍보 학보, 20(3), 5-34, , 2018

      120. 국내 기업의 ESG 활동 인식이 심리적거리를 통해 구매의도에 미 치는 영향: 제품관여도 수준에 따른 차이 분석, 서영욱, 지용빈, 한국콘텐츠학 회논문지, 21(12), , 2021

      121. 국내 기업의 ESG활동에 대한 소비자 인식이 지각된 가치와 심리 적 거리를 통해 행동의도에 미치는 영향 연구,, 지용빈, 대전대학교 대학원, 박 사학위논문, , 2022

      122. IPA 분석을 통한 자활기업 상품의 마케팅믹스, 소비자 충성도 소비자 지각연구: 부산광역시 G 커피숍 이용자를 중심으로,, 이진열, 사회과학 연구, 56(1), 157-204, , 2017

      123. Does Serving the Community Also Serve the Company ? Using organizational Identification and Social Exchange Theories to Understand Employee Responses to a Volunteerism Programme, Jones , D . A, 83 ( 4 ) , 857-878, , 1980

      124. 기업의 지속가능 성공 시 제도화를 위한 시론: 사회적 책임 (Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) 정보와 그외 비재무정보 유형화에 기초하여,, 안수현, 환경법연구, 29(1), 35-88, , 2007

      125. CSR활동의 동기요인과 속성요인이 진정성과 기업태도에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구: 대인관계지향성과 인지욕구의 조절효과를 중심으로,, 최기석, 인하대학교 대학원, 박사학위논문, , 2020

      126. 국내 대기업이 지속가능경영이 인지된 경영성과에 미치는 영향 에 관한 연구: 공유가치창출(CSV)의 조절효과를 중심으로, 숭실대학교 대 학원, 서명훈, 박사학위논문, , 2020

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼