RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    난징대학살의 영화적 재현 연구 = Cinematic Representation of the NanjingMassacre

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15672277

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In 1937, the Second Sino-Japanese War broke out. Japanese Army
    invaded Nanjing, the capital city of China back then, and occupied the
    whole city in just thirteen days. As soon as entering the old castle
    city, Japanese Army began an annihilation operation. They
    slaughtered not only a lot of captive Chinese soldiers but a number
    of innocent civilians, whether young or old, men or women. Also they
    raped numerous Chinese women, whether young or old, pregnant or
    not. Studies suggested that 200,000~300,000 Chinese people had been
    slaughtered and 20,000~80,000 Chinese women had been raped during
    the occupation of Japanese Army from December 1937 to January
    1938, which is just about 6 weeks. It is called the Nanjing(Nanking)
    Massacre. The victims of the massacre mostly were burned or
    dumped to river or buried.
    Nanjing Massacre is called one of the worst war crime in 20th
    century. But after the Second Sino-Japanese War was over, the hegemony around China and the politics of East Asia have rapidly
    changed. Both of the newly-born Chinese government and the
    defeated Japanese government did not eagerly want to deal with the
    Nanjing Massacre. But in early 1980s, just as Japan government tried
    to distort the mid-20th century’s history among Japan and other East
    Asian countries, the issue of the Nanjing Massacre was unwillingly
    recalled to the contemporary history. Beijing outraged on the Japanese
    government’s history distortion attempt. Chinese government, ruled by
    Supreme leader Deng Xiao-ping, swiftly decided to build a memorial
    hall in Nanjing and put the Nanjing Massacre on school textbooks.
    At the moment, a number of documentaries covering the Nanjing
    Massacre released. And in 1987, the first feature film about the
    Nanjing massacre were produced in China and released to the public.
    In 1990s, Iris Chang, a Chinese-American journalist, has privately
    covered the Nanjing Massacre and published a book titled The rape
    of Nanking. The book of Chang’s has sparkled global interests on the
    Nanjing massacre and put the issue on one of the hottest episode in
    the 20th century.
    This doctoral thesis fully aimed at the Nanjing Massacre. Since
    1987, nine films dealing with the Nanjing Massacre have been
    produced through the world. Seven of them are from Greater China
    and two are from non-Chinese countries. Analysing the nine films
    with the methods of cinematic semiology, it tried to suggest how the
    films represented the Nanjing Massacre and how the tragic history
    was remembered by audience. Additionally, it tried to suggest how
    the Nanjing Massacre was happened and progressed and evaluated in the perspective of history studies.
    It concluded that the Nanjing Massacre is an outcome of highly
    intended operation by the Japanese Army during the Second
    Sino-Japanese War that aimed at the Chinese people with massive
    slaughter and brutal rape. But with regret the reality was uncovered
    for a long time and is still controlled by political hegemonies.
    Analysing films showed that the early Chinese films focused the
    victims and damages at large, but the films released afterwards
    gradually proceeded to deal with the topic of patriotic nationalism.
    And almost every films have represented the great ‘subaltern’ - the
    subjugated class – who volunteerly defended themselves, helped each
    other, sacrificed for neighbors against all odds without any help
    from the Chinese government. Above all, the films showed the
    collapse of the Chinese patriarchy and the return the great and
    primitive maternalism of the Chinese people.
    번역하기

    In 1937, the Second Sino-Japanese War broke out. Japanese Army invaded Nanjing, the capital city of China back then, and occupied the whole city in just thirteen days. As soon as entering the old castle city, Japanese Army began an annihilation operat...

    In 1937, the Second Sino-Japanese War broke out. Japanese Army
    invaded Nanjing, the capital city of China back then, and occupied the
    whole city in just thirteen days. As soon as entering the old castle
    city, Japanese Army began an annihilation operation. They
    slaughtered not only a lot of captive Chinese soldiers but a number
    of innocent civilians, whether young or old, men or women. Also they
    raped numerous Chinese women, whether young or old, pregnant or
    not. Studies suggested that 200,000~300,000 Chinese people had been
    slaughtered and 20,000~80,000 Chinese women had been raped during
    the occupation of Japanese Army from December 1937 to January
    1938, which is just about 6 weeks. It is called the Nanjing(Nanking)
    Massacre. The victims of the massacre mostly were burned or
    dumped to river or buried.
    Nanjing Massacre is called one of the worst war crime in 20th
    century. But after the Second Sino-Japanese War was over, the hegemony around China and the politics of East Asia have rapidly
    changed. Both of the newly-born Chinese government and the
    defeated Japanese government did not eagerly want to deal with the
    Nanjing Massacre. But in early 1980s, just as Japan government tried
    to distort the mid-20th century’s history among Japan and other East
    Asian countries, the issue of the Nanjing Massacre was unwillingly
    recalled to the contemporary history. Beijing outraged on the Japanese
    government’s history distortion attempt. Chinese government, ruled by
    Supreme leader Deng Xiao-ping, swiftly decided to build a memorial
    hall in Nanjing and put the Nanjing Massacre on school textbooks.
    At the moment, a number of documentaries covering the Nanjing
    Massacre released. And in 1987, the first feature film about the
    Nanjing massacre were produced in China and released to the public.
    In 1990s, Iris Chang, a Chinese-American journalist, has privately
    covered the Nanjing Massacre and published a book titled The rape
    of Nanking. The book of Chang’s has sparkled global interests on the
    Nanjing massacre and put the issue on one of the hottest episode in
    the 20th century.
    This doctoral thesis fully aimed at the Nanjing Massacre. Since
    1987, nine films dealing with the Nanjing Massacre have been
    produced through the world. Seven of them are from Greater China
    and two are from non-Chinese countries. Analysing the nine films
    with the methods of cinematic semiology, it tried to suggest how the
    films represented the Nanjing Massacre and how the tragic history
    was remembered by audience. Additionally, it tried to suggest how
    the Nanjing Massacre was happened and progressed and evaluated in the perspective of history studies.
    It concluded that the Nanjing Massacre is an outcome of highly
    intended operation by the Japanese Army during the Second
    Sino-Japanese War that aimed at the Chinese people with massive
    slaughter and brutal rape. But with regret the reality was uncovered
    for a long time and is still controlled by political hegemonies.
    Analysing films showed that the early Chinese films focused the
    victims and damages at large, but the films released afterwards
    gradually proceeded to deal with the topic of patriotic nationalism.
    And almost every films have represented the great ‘subaltern’ - the
    subjugated class – who volunteerly defended themselves, helped each
    other, sacrificed for neighbors against all odds without any help
    from the Chinese government. Above all, the films showed the
    collapse of the Chinese patriarchy and the return the great and
    primitive maternalism of the Chinese people.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1937년 중국과 일본 간 전쟁이 발발하였다. 일본군은 당시 중국의 수
    도 난징(南京)을 침공해 점령하고 포로로 잡힌 군인과 민간인을 무차별
    학살하고 나이를 가리지 않고 여성을 성폭행하였다. 이로써 20~30만 명
    의 인명이 학살되고 2~8만 명의 여성이 성폭행을 당하였다. 이를 난징대
    학살(Nanjing Massacre, 南京大屠殺)이라 부른다. 난징대학살은 단일 사
    안으로는 20세기 최악의 사건 중 하나로 기록될 사안이다.
    그러나 전쟁이 끝난 뒤 중국의 정치 헤게모니가 급변하고 동아시아 정
    세가 변화하면서 가해자인 일본과 피해자인 중국 모두 오랫동안 관심을
    가지지 않았다. 1980년대 일본 정부의 역사 교과서 왜곡 파문이 일어나
    면서 난징대학살은 다시 역사의 현장으로 소환된다. 중국 정부는 난징대
    학살의 비극을 적극 조명하기로 하고 기념관을 세우고 교과서에 게재하
    는 한편 연구를 본격화하였다. 난징대학살을 소재로 한 다큐멘터리에 이
    어 최초의 극영화도 이때 제작돼 상영되었다. 1990년대 중국계 미국인
    아이리스 장은 개인적인 취재를 통해 책을 발간하여 난징에서 일어난 일
    본군의 대학살과 여성들에 대한 강간을 전 세계에 고발하였다. 당시 난
    징에서 안전구를 설립해 많은 인명을 구조한 욘 라베의 일기도 반세기
    만에 공개되었다. 이에 따라 난징대학살은 중일간의 문제에서 전 세계적
    인 이슈로 확대되었다. 이후 난징대학살을 소재로 한 극영화가 다수 제
    작되었다.
    이 논문은 20세기 최악의 참사 중 하나인 난징대학살을 소재로 한 극
    영화를 영화기호학을 통해 분석함으로써 난징대학살이라는 역사적 사실이 어떻게 재현되고 그로 인해 어떻게 기억되는가를 제시하고자 하였다.
    이를 위해 먼저 난징대학살의 발생과 경과, 평가에 대한 사적(史的) 연구
    를 실시하여 역사적 관점에서 재정리하였다. 이어 난징대학살을 소재로
    한 영화 9편에 대한 서사분석을 실시하여 인물과 서사구조를 파악하였
    다. 서사분석은 통합체 분석과 계열체 분석, 행위주 모델 분석으로 이루
    어졌다. 서사분석에 이어 난징대학살 소재 영화에 대한 담론분석을 실시
    하여 영화의 주제와 심층의 의미 그리고 그 의미들의 관계를 분석하였
    다.
    사적 연구의 결과, 난징대학살에 대한 진상이 재정립되었다. 난징대학
    살은 중일전쟁 중 일어난 만행이었으나 정치적 이해관계로 인해 오랫동
    안 진상이 가려져 왔다. 난징대학살은 중국의 영웅주의에 입각한 승리사
    관에 부합되지 않았고, 중일수교에도 좋지 않은 영향을 줄 수 있었기 때
    문이다. 그러나 1980년대 들어 일본이 역사교과서 왜곡을 시도하면서 중
    국은 난징대학살을 항일전쟁사의 치부에서 중국 민중이 기억해야 할 역
    사로 전환하여 국가적으로 기념하기 시작하였다. 2000년대 들어 한발 물
    러선 모습을 보이기도 하였으나 중국 정부는 여전히 난징대학살을 애국
    주의와 민족주의적 역사 자원으로 삼아 기념하고 있다.
    난징대학살을 소재로 한 영화에 대한 서사분석에서는 중화권 영화 7편
    과 비 중화권 영화 2편 등 모두 9편의 영화를 분석하였다. 전체 영화를
    통틀어 ‘일본군의 폭력’과 ‘중국인의 생존’이라는 이항이 대립됨을 파악하
    였다. 또 영화 전체를 관통하는 주된 서사는 ‘일본군이 난징을 침공하여
    무자비한 학살과 강간을 자행하고 이에 대해 중국사회와 서구사회는 생
    존을 위해 투쟁하고 저항한다’는 내용으로 수렴되었다. 행위주 모델 분석
    을 통해서는 9편 전체에서 주체들(주인공들)이 자신의 생존과 안전보다
    가족 또는 공공을 대상으로 삼아 그들의 안녕과 구조를 추구하였음이 드
    러났다.
    난징대학살 소재 영화에 대한 담론분석에서는 유의미한 결과가 도출되
    었다. 중화권의 초기 영화에서는 일본군의 잔인한 폭력과 중국인들의 막
    대한 피해가 주로 재현되었지만, 점차 이를 극복한 애국적 민족주의로
    내용이 변화하였음을 확인하였다. 또, 비 중화권 영화를 포함한 난징대학
    살 소재 영화 전편에서 역사에서 주목받지 못하였던 인물들 즉 서발턴
    (subaltern)의 활약을 확인하였다. 영화에는 전쟁고아와 승려, 하급 군인,기녀, 여학생 등 다양한 서발턴이 등장해 생생하고 독특한 서사를 제공
    하였다. 중국 정부와 엘리트계층이 난징을 떠나거나 제 몫을 하지 못한
    가운데 서발턴은 스스로 지키고 돕고 희생하였다. 난징대학살이라는 극
    한상황에서 서발턴은 역사의 작인(agent)으로 호명(appellation)되었던 것
    이다. 이와 함께 전체 영화를 통틀어 중국의 가부장제의 위기와 극한의
    위기 상황에서 모성(母性)으로 회귀하려는 의도가 강하게 읽혀졌다. 가부
    장제의 위기는 중국이 봉건사회에서 근대국가로 전환하기 위한 통과의례
    가 되지만 난징대학살에서 극단적인 형태로 나타났다. 난징대학살로 남
    성들이 부재한 상황이 발생하였는데 이는 가부장제의 위기로 이어진다.
    이때 생존을 위한 중국인의 노력은 모성회귀로 나아갔다. 모성의 재현은
    정주하거나 회귀해야 할 심리적 공간으로 여성뿐 아니라 패잔병과 승려
    와 같은 남성성을 잃어버린 남성들에게도 찾아볼 수 있었다. 이와 같은
    강력한 모성과 여성화된 남성들은 서발턴과 민족주의와 결합하여 보다
    강력해졌고, 그들은 더 이상 인습에 얽매이지 않고 능동적이고 주체적으
    로 미래를 열어가는 동력이 되었다. 이에 따라 영화의 결말도 수많은 사
    람들의 죽음 속에서도 여학생과 어린이의 생존을 추구하는 미래지향적인
    결말이 대세를 이루었음을 확인하였다.
    번역하기

    1937년 중국과 일본 간 전쟁이 발발하였다. 일본군은 당시 중국의 수 도 난징(南京)을 침공해 점령하고 포로로 잡힌 군인과 민간인을 무차별 학살하고 나이를 가리지 않고 여성을 성폭행하였...

    1937년 중국과 일본 간 전쟁이 발발하였다. 일본군은 당시 중국의 수
    도 난징(南京)을 침공해 점령하고 포로로 잡힌 군인과 민간인을 무차별
    학살하고 나이를 가리지 않고 여성을 성폭행하였다. 이로써 20~30만 명
    의 인명이 학살되고 2~8만 명의 여성이 성폭행을 당하였다. 이를 난징대
    학살(Nanjing Massacre, 南京大屠殺)이라 부른다. 난징대학살은 단일 사
    안으로는 20세기 최악의 사건 중 하나로 기록될 사안이다.
    그러나 전쟁이 끝난 뒤 중국의 정치 헤게모니가 급변하고 동아시아 정
    세가 변화하면서 가해자인 일본과 피해자인 중국 모두 오랫동안 관심을
    가지지 않았다. 1980년대 일본 정부의 역사 교과서 왜곡 파문이 일어나
    면서 난징대학살은 다시 역사의 현장으로 소환된다. 중국 정부는 난징대
    학살의 비극을 적극 조명하기로 하고 기념관을 세우고 교과서에 게재하
    는 한편 연구를 본격화하였다. 난징대학살을 소재로 한 다큐멘터리에 이
    어 최초의 극영화도 이때 제작돼 상영되었다. 1990년대 중국계 미국인
    아이리스 장은 개인적인 취재를 통해 책을 발간하여 난징에서 일어난 일
    본군의 대학살과 여성들에 대한 강간을 전 세계에 고발하였다. 당시 난
    징에서 안전구를 설립해 많은 인명을 구조한 욘 라베의 일기도 반세기
    만에 공개되었다. 이에 따라 난징대학살은 중일간의 문제에서 전 세계적
    인 이슈로 확대되었다. 이후 난징대학살을 소재로 한 극영화가 다수 제
    작되었다.
    이 논문은 20세기 최악의 참사 중 하나인 난징대학살을 소재로 한 극
    영화를 영화기호학을 통해 분석함으로써 난징대학살이라는 역사적 사실이 어떻게 재현되고 그로 인해 어떻게 기억되는가를 제시하고자 하였다.
    이를 위해 먼저 난징대학살의 발생과 경과, 평가에 대한 사적(史的) 연구
    를 실시하여 역사적 관점에서 재정리하였다. 이어 난징대학살을 소재로
    한 영화 9편에 대한 서사분석을 실시하여 인물과 서사구조를 파악하였
    다. 서사분석은 통합체 분석과 계열체 분석, 행위주 모델 분석으로 이루
    어졌다. 서사분석에 이어 난징대학살 소재 영화에 대한 담론분석을 실시
    하여 영화의 주제와 심층의 의미 그리고 그 의미들의 관계를 분석하였
    다.
    사적 연구의 결과, 난징대학살에 대한 진상이 재정립되었다. 난징대학
    살은 중일전쟁 중 일어난 만행이었으나 정치적 이해관계로 인해 오랫동
    안 진상이 가려져 왔다. 난징대학살은 중국의 영웅주의에 입각한 승리사
    관에 부합되지 않았고, 중일수교에도 좋지 않은 영향을 줄 수 있었기 때
    문이다. 그러나 1980년대 들어 일본이 역사교과서 왜곡을 시도하면서 중
    국은 난징대학살을 항일전쟁사의 치부에서 중국 민중이 기억해야 할 역
    사로 전환하여 국가적으로 기념하기 시작하였다. 2000년대 들어 한발 물
    러선 모습을 보이기도 하였으나 중국 정부는 여전히 난징대학살을 애국
    주의와 민족주의적 역사 자원으로 삼아 기념하고 있다.
    난징대학살을 소재로 한 영화에 대한 서사분석에서는 중화권 영화 7편
    과 비 중화권 영화 2편 등 모두 9편의 영화를 분석하였다. 전체 영화를
    통틀어 ‘일본군의 폭력’과 ‘중국인의 생존’이라는 이항이 대립됨을 파악하
    였다. 또 영화 전체를 관통하는 주된 서사는 ‘일본군이 난징을 침공하여
    무자비한 학살과 강간을 자행하고 이에 대해 중국사회와 서구사회는 생
    존을 위해 투쟁하고 저항한다’는 내용으로 수렴되었다. 행위주 모델 분석
    을 통해서는 9편 전체에서 주체들(주인공들)이 자신의 생존과 안전보다
    가족 또는 공공을 대상으로 삼아 그들의 안녕과 구조를 추구하였음이 드
    러났다.
    난징대학살 소재 영화에 대한 담론분석에서는 유의미한 결과가 도출되
    었다. 중화권의 초기 영화에서는 일본군의 잔인한 폭력과 중국인들의 막
    대한 피해가 주로 재현되었지만, 점차 이를 극복한 애국적 민족주의로
    내용이 변화하였음을 확인하였다. 또, 비 중화권 영화를 포함한 난징대학
    살 소재 영화 전편에서 역사에서 주목받지 못하였던 인물들 즉 서발턴
    (subaltern)의 활약을 확인하였다. 영화에는 전쟁고아와 승려, 하급 군인,기녀, 여학생 등 다양한 서발턴이 등장해 생생하고 독특한 서사를 제공
    하였다. 중국 정부와 엘리트계층이 난징을 떠나거나 제 몫을 하지 못한
    가운데 서발턴은 스스로 지키고 돕고 희생하였다. 난징대학살이라는 극
    한상황에서 서발턴은 역사의 작인(agent)으로 호명(appellation)되었던 것
    이다. 이와 함께 전체 영화를 통틀어 중국의 가부장제의 위기와 극한의
    위기 상황에서 모성(母性)으로 회귀하려는 의도가 강하게 읽혀졌다. 가부
    장제의 위기는 중국이 봉건사회에서 근대국가로 전환하기 위한 통과의례
    가 되지만 난징대학살에서 극단적인 형태로 나타났다. 난징대학살로 남
    성들이 부재한 상황이 발생하였는데 이는 가부장제의 위기로 이어진다.
    이때 생존을 위한 중국인의 노력은 모성회귀로 나아갔다. 모성의 재현은
    정주하거나 회귀해야 할 심리적 공간으로 여성뿐 아니라 패잔병과 승려
    와 같은 남성성을 잃어버린 남성들에게도 찾아볼 수 있었다. 이와 같은
    강력한 모성과 여성화된 남성들은 서발턴과 민족주의와 결합하여 보다
    강력해졌고, 그들은 더 이상 인습에 얽매이지 않고 능동적이고 주체적으
    로 미래를 열어가는 동력이 되었다. 이에 따라 영화의 결말도 수많은 사
    람들의 죽음 속에서도 여학생과 어린이의 생존을 추구하는 미래지향적인
    결말이 대세를 이루었음을 확인하였다.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 ··········································································································1
    • 제2장 역사 서술과 영화적 재현 ································································3
    • 1. 역사는 어떻게 기억되는가? ·····································································3
    • 2. 영화는 어떻게 역사를 서술하는가? ·······················································6
    • 3. 영화는 어떻게 해독되는가? ··································································13
    • 제1장 서론 ··········································································································1
    • 제2장 역사 서술과 영화적 재현 ································································3
    • 1. 역사는 어떻게 기억되는가? ·····································································3
    • 2. 영화는 어떻게 역사를 서술하는가? ·······················································6
    • 3. 영화는 어떻게 해독되는가? ··································································13
    • 제3장 중화권 영화의 역사 재현 ······························································23
    • 1. 영화의 도입 시기부터 개혁개방 초기까지의 중국영화 ···················23
    • 2. 개혁개방 이후의 중국영화 ·····································································28
    • 3. 홍콩영화와 대만영화의 변천 ·································································35
    • 제4장 선행연구 검토 - 난징대학살에 관한 역사학과 영화 ············41
    • 1. 난징대학살에 대한 사적(史的) 연구의 추이 ····································· 41
    • 2. 난징대학살 소재 영화 연구 경향 ·························································45
    • 제5장 연구문제 및 연구방법 ·····································································54
    • 1. 연구문제 ·····································································································54
    • 2. 연구방법 ·····································································································55
    • 1) 사적(史的) 연구방법 ···········································································55
    • 2) 영화기호학적 연구방법 ······································································56
    • (1) 통합체 분석 ····················································································57
    • (2) 계열체 분석 ····················································································57
    • (3) 행위주 모델 분석 ··········································································59
    • (4) 담론 분석 ························································································60
    • 제6장 난징대학살의 역사적 서술 ····························································63
    • 1. 중일전쟁의 역사적 경과 ·········································································63
    • 1) 중일전쟁의 발발 ··················································································63
    • 2) 중일전쟁의 초기 전개 – 화북(華北)전투 ·····································66
    • 3) 중일전쟁의 초기 전개 – 상하이(上海)전투또는화동(華東)전투 ······ 69
    • 4) 중일전쟁 발발이 한국에 미친 영향 ················································71
    • 2. 난징대학살의 실체와 사적(史的) 기록 ···············································75
    • 1) ‘민국시대’의 수도 난징 ······································································75
    • 2) 난징전투 ································································································78
    • 3) 난징대학살 ····························································································84
    • 3. 난징대학살의 기억학 ···············································································90
    • 1) 중국 개혁개방 이전의 ‘난징대학살’에 대한 역사적 인식 ·········· 90
    • (1) 종전과 전범재판 ············································································90
    • (2) 국공내전과 신정부의 수립 ··························································92
    • 2) 중국 개혁개방 이후의 ‘난징대학살’에 대한 역사적 평가 ········ 101
    • (1) 일본의 역사교과서 왜곡과 난징대학살 ·····································101
    • (2) 일본의 역사교과서 왜곡과 일본 학술계의 난징대학살 논쟁·· 104
    • (3) 아이리스 장과 욘 라베의 개인적 기억 ·································· 106
    • 제7장 난징대학살에 대한 영화적 역사 서술 – 서사분석 ············· 111
    • 1. <도성혈증> (1987) ················································································112
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································112
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································115
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································118
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································119
    • 2. <흑태양-난징대학살> (1995) ·····························································121
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································121
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································124
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································126
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································128
    • 3. <난징1937> (1995) ················································································129
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ··········································································129
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································132
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································135
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································136
    • 4. <오월 팔월> (2002) ··············································································137
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································137
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································140
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································142
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································144
    • 5. <치샤사1937> (2004) ············································································145
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································145
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································148
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································151
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································153
    • 6. <황시> (2008) ························································································155
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································155
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································159
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································162
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································164
    • 7. <존 라베-난징대학살> (2009) ···························································165
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································165
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································169
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································173
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································175
    • 8. <난징!난징!> (2009) ·············································································176
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································176
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································180
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································185
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································187
    • 9. <진링의 13소녀> (2011) ······································································189
    • 1) 작품개요와 줄거리 ············································································189
    • 2) 통합체 분석 ························································································193
    • 3) 계열체 분석 ························································································199
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 ··············································································200
    • 10. 서사분석 종합 ·······················································································203
    • 1) 작품개요 종합 ····················································································203
    • 2) 통합체 분석 종합 ··············································································204
    • 3) 계열체 분석 종합 ··············································································204
    • 4) 행위주 모델 분석 종합 ····································································205
    • 제8장 난징대학살에 대한 영화적 역사 서술 – 담론분석 ············· 208
    • 1. 고발과 민족주의적 역사 재현 ·····························································210
    • 1) 피해 서사에서 극복 서사로의 전이 ··············································211
    • 2) 민족주의적 서사의 기입 ··································································220
    • 2. 역사적 작인(作人)으로서의 서발턴 ···················································223
    • 1) 중국의 부재 ························································································224
    • 2) 서발턴 서사의 강화 ··········································································226
    • 3) 오리엔탈리즘적 시선과 서발턴 서사의 교차 ······························232
    • 3. 가부장의 부재와 모성회귀 ···································································239
    • 1) 가부장제의 위기 ················································································239
    • 2) 모성 회귀 ····························································································243
    • 제9장 결론 : 역사와 영화의 마주보기 ················································251
    • 참고문헌 ········································································································257
    • 영문초록 ········································································································262
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 『문화 연구자』, 정재철, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2013

    2. 『제국의 습격』, 김용성, 서울 : MBC프로덕션, , 2008

    3. 『미디어 기호학』, 백선기, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2015

    4. <존 라베-난징대학살>, John Rabe, MP4 file,

    5. 『비판적 담화분석』, 최윤선, 서울: 한국문화사, , 2014

    6. 『중국영화의 오늘』, 강내영, 부산: 산지니, , 2015

    7. 『중국영화의 이해』, 임대근, 서울: 동녘, , 2008

    8. 『중국청년감독열전』, 강내영, 부산: 산지니, , 2016

    9. 『중국영화의 거장들』, 이종철, 서울 : 학고방, , 2008

    10. 「영화 이해의 길잡이」, 정재형, 서울: 개마고원, , 2003

    1. 『문화 연구자』, 정재철, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2013

    2. 『제국의 습격』, 김용성, 서울 : MBC프로덕션, , 2008

    3. 『미디어 기호학』, 백선기, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2015

    4. <존 라베-난징대학살>, John Rabe, MP4 file,

    5. 『비판적 담화분석』, 최윤선, 서울: 한국문화사, , 2014

    6. 『중국영화의 오늘』, 강내영, 부산: 산지니, , 2015

    7. 『중국영화의 이해』, 임대근, 서울: 동녘, , 2008

    8. 『중국청년감독열전』, 강내영, 부산: 산지니, , 2016

    9. 『중국영화의 거장들』, 이종철, 서울 : 학고방, , 2008

    10. 「영화 이해의 길잡이」, 정재형, 서울: 개마고원, , 2003

    11. 「문화연구의 핵심개념」, 정재철, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2014

    12. 『영화분석의 기초 개념』, 윤종욱, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2017

    13. 『20세기의 역사철학자들』, 임희완, 서울: 건국대출판부, , 2003

    14. 『영화비평의 이론과 실제』, 서인숙, 서울: 집문당, , 1996

    15. 『탈식민주의에 대한 성찰』, 박종성, 서울: 살림, , 2006

    16. 『한국전쟁의 기억과 사진』, 김형곤, 파주 : 한국학술정보, , 2007

    17. 『인문학, 기호학을 말하다』, 송효섭, 서울: 이숲, , 2013

    18. 「난징 상상과 민국문화의 재현」, 박정희, 『인문연구』 69호, , 2013

    19. 『조관희 교수의 중국현대사 강의』, 조관희, 서울 : 궁리출판, , 2013

    20. 『영화 그 기호학적 해석의 즐거움』, 백선기, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, , 2007

    21. 「남경대학살의 상흔과 성찰적 기억」, 김창규, 『중국근현대사연구』 37 집, , 2013

    22. 『영화 그 기호학적 해석의 즐거움 2 』, 백선기, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북 스, , 2010

    23. 『중국 6세대영화, 삶의 본질을 논하다』, 안상혁, 한성구, 서울: 성균관대 학교 출판부, , 2008

    24. 「중일전쟁 시기 난징 한인의 군상~1945)」, 윤은자, 『동방학지』 181집, 2017, , 1937

    25. Orientalism, , 박홍규 옮김, 『오리엔탈리즘』, Said, E., 서울: 교보 문고, 1999, , 1978

    26. 「시뮬라크르 시대에서 역사란 무엇인가」, 김기봉, 『한국언어문화』 25 집, , 2004

    27. 「난징대학살 소재 영화의 역사 서술 연구」, 이심이, 동명대 대학원 석 사학위 논문, , 2018

    28. Cinema et Histoire, , 주경철 옮김,『역사와 영화』, Ferro, M., 서 울: 까치, 1999, , 1993

    29. 「장예모 작품들에 나타난 가부장제의 위기」, 이희승, 『언론학연구』 8 권, , 2004

    30. 「중국과 일본 역사교과서의 중일전쟁 서술」, 이금상, 『청람사학』 18 집, , 2010

    31. 「중앙아시아 고려인 강제이주에 관한 연구」, 이원봉, 『아태연구』 8집, , 2001

    32. Primitive Passions, , 정재서 옮김, 『원시적 열정』, Chow, R., 서 울: 이산, 2004, , 1995

    33. 「<진링의 13소녀>의 서발턴 서사의 스토리텔링」, 김용성, 이희승, 『영 상기술연구』 30집, , 2019

    34. Le Signifiant Imaginaire, 이수진 옮김, 『상상적 기 표』, Metz, C., 서울: 문학과지성사, 2009, , 1997

    35. 「일제의 중일전쟁 도발과 조선민중의 경제생활」, 송규진, 『사총』 94 집, , 2018

    36. 「화해를 위한 두 진혼곡-<색,계>와 <난징! 난징!>」, 백지운, 『중국현 대문학』50호, , 2009

    37. What is History?, , 김택현 옮김, 『역사란 무엇인가 ?』, Carr, E.H., 서울: 까치, 1997, , 1961

    38. 「난징대학살을 잊는 것은 또 한 번의 대학살이다」, 양단위, 『관훈저 널』 133집, , 2014

    39. Morphology of the Folktale, , 어건주 옮김, 『민담형태 론』, Propp, V., 서울: 지식을만드는지식, 2013, , 1928

    40. 「21세기 한국과 중국의 전쟁 영화에 담긴 반전 의식」, 김종수, 『한중 인문학연구』 62집, , 2019

    41. 「동아시아에서의 제2차 세계대전의 기념과 집단기억」, 박찬승, 『동아 시아문화연구』 64집, , 2016

    42. 「중앙아시아 고려인의 이주과정과 민족문화의 정체성」, 김중관, 『글로 벌문화연구』 7권 1호, , 2016

    43. Qu’est-ce Que Le Cin ma, , 박상규 옮김, 『영화란 무 엇인가?』, Bazin, A., 서울: 사문난적, 2013, , 1975

    44. 『히스토리아, 쿠오바디스 –탈근대, 역사학은 어디로 가는가』, 김기봉, 서울: 서해문집, , 2016

    45. 「년대 한국영화 내러티브에 나타난 근대적 욕망과 도시 공 간」, 김훈순, 2009, , 1960

    46. 「중일전쟁 시기(1937~1945) 국민정부군의 대일군사전략 변화 연구」, 기세찬, 고려대 박사학위 논문,, , 2010

    47. Film-und Fernsehanalyse, Metzler, , 김영목 옮김, 『영화와 텔레비전 분석』, Hickethier, K., 서울: 연세대학교 출판부, 2005, , 2001

    48. 「중일전쟁 초기 국민정부군의 항전전략과 전술 재검토 (1937~1938)」, 기세찬, 『군사』 78호,, , 2011

    49. 『金陵十三釵(J in Ling Shi San Chai)』, , 김이경 옮김, 『진링의 13소녀』, Yan Ge Ling(嚴歌苓), 서울: 뿔, 2012, , 2006

    50. 「중국 남경대학살 연구 현황과 평화운동 – 일본군 남경대학 살 연구」, 장시엔원, 『4 3과 역사』 5집, , 2005

    51. 「중국 신전쟁영화에 관한 연구 -<난징! 난징!>(루추안,2009)을 중심으로」, 설휘, 국민대 석사학위 논문, , 2014

    52. 「‘난징대학살’ 문제를 둘러싼 기억의 정치와 국제정치학 적 딜레마」, 고희탁, 이화준, 『일본연구』 15집, , 2011

    53. 「미완의 치유로 남겨진 비극의 역사 – 장이머우의 <금릉십삼 채> 읽기」, 유강하, 『인문학논총』 36집, , 2014

    54. L’analyse des films, Armand Colin, Paris, , 이윤영 옮김 『영화작품 분석 (1934-1988)』, Marie, M, Amount, J, 서울: 아카넷,2016, , 2004

    55. 「난징대학살과 기억의 정책-학살에 대한 기억의 전승과 관리를 중심으로」, 김형열, 『대구사학』 106호, , 2012

    56. 「중국의 위험한 민족수난사 교육 : 근현대교과서의 전쟁사관을 중심으로」, 오병수, 『역사교육논집』 34집, , 2005

    57. Mythologies edition du Seuil, , 이화여자대학교 기호 학연구소 옮김, 『현대의 신화』, Barthes, R., 서울: 동문선, 1997, , 1957

    58. Understanding Media : the extension of man, , 박 정규 옮김, 『미디어의 이해-인간의 확장』, McLuhan, M., 서울: 커뮤니케이션북 스, 2001, , 1964

    59. (ed. by Erwin Wickert), Der gute Deutsche von Nanking. , 장수미 옮김, 『존 라베 난징의 굿맨』, Rabe, J., 서울: 이룸, 2009, , 1997

    60. Practice of Looking : An Introduction to Visual Culture. , 윤태진 외 옮김, 『영상문 화의 이해』, Sturken, M., Cartwright, L., 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스, 2006, , 2001

    61. 「정주(停住)하는 모성의 기호들 : <가족의 탄생>, <괴물>, <열 혈남아>를 중심으로」, 이희승, 『언론과학연구』 13권 1호, , 2013

    62. 「전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조-전쟁종료문제 의 인식과 해석의 어긋남」, 최은봉, 오승희, 《일본사상》 제25호, , 2013

    63. 「탈/냉전 중국의 전쟁 기억과 민족 서사의 곤경-<만종>, <난 징! 난징!>을 중심으로」, 김정수, 『중국소설논총』 46집, , 2015

    64. An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture, , 박모 옮김, 『문화연구와 문화이론』, Storey, J., 서울: 현실문 화연구, 1994, , 1993

    65. 『南京大屠殺 硏究』, , 신진호, 탕쿤 옮김, 『난징대학살 진상과 역사 기록을 담다』, 장롄홍(張連紅), 쑨자이웨이(孫宅巍), 서울: 민속 원, 2019, , 2014

    66. 「<난징! 난징!>을 둘러싼 중국의 탈민족주의 논쟁 : 탈식민적 저항성은 어디로 갈 것인가」, 김희교, 『역사와 문학 21』, 문화사학회, , 2011

    67. 「중일전쟁시기 딩링(丁玲)의 일본군 성폭력재현과 1956년 전범 재판 그리고 피해자 증언의 의미」, 이선이, 『중국학보』 80집,, , 2017

    68. 「개인의 내면으로 침잠된 전쟁의 풍경 : 장이머우 영화 <금릉 십삼채>의 ‘집’ 이미지를 중심으로」, 문현선, 『영상문화』20집, , 2012

    69. Story and Discourse : Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film, , 홍재범 역, 『이야기와 담화, 영화와 소설의 서사 구조』, Chatman, S., 고양: 호모 루덴스, 2019, , 1978

    70. The Rape of Nanking - The Forgotten Holocaust of World War Ⅱ, , 윤지환 옮김, 『역사는 누구의 편에 서는가 – 난 징대학살, 그 야만적 진실의 기록』, Chang, I., 서울: 미다스북스, 2014, , 1997

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼