RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    대학생 진로탐색행동 척도 개발 및 타당화 = Development and Validation of Career Exploration Behavior Scale for Undergraduate Students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15521341

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is to develop career exploration behavior scale for undergraduate students and to identify reliability and validity for the scale so that it can identify subtypes of career exploration behavior and distribution of subtypes of career exploration behavior based on gender, grade, career adaptability, and career decision-making. To achieve its purpose, the following steps have conducted for the study.
    First, literature review, interview, and open-ended questionaries conducted to identify a concept of career exploration behavior and its components that reflect characteristics of Korean undergraduate students. career exploration behavior is composed of Career Enrichment Behavior(CEB), Career Specification Behavior(CSB), and Career Congruence Assessing Behavior(CCAB). CEB consists of two subcomponents such as Self Enrichment Behavior(SEB) and Vocation Enrichment Behavior(VEB), and CSB consists of two subcomponents such as Self Specification Behavior(SSB) and Vocation Specification Behavior(VSB). 63 preliminary items were chosen based on literature review, interview, open-ended questionaries, existing career exploration behavior scales, and expert evaluation.
    Second, 5 components(SEB, VEB, SSB, VSB, CCAB) and 32 items were identified after a pilot test with 375 undergraduate students and exploratory factor analysis.
    Third, through the main research conducted with 811 undergraduate students nationwide and the following confirmatory factor analysis, 25 items of the hierarchical second-order factor model were determined. career exploration behavior is composed of CEB(9 items), CSB(10 items), and CCAB(6 items). CEB consists of two subcomponents such as SEB(5 items) and VEB(4 items), and CSB consists of two subcomponents such as SSB(6 items) and VSB(4 items).
    Forth, The construct validity and concurrent validity were found acceptable as the career exploration behavior scale developed in this study was found to be positively correlated with other instruments such as Career Exploration Behavior(Choi, 2003), Career Preparation Type inventory for Korean College Student(K-CPTI), which were designed to assess similar constructs. Moreover, cross-validation was also verified with 323 undergraduate students for the hierarchical second-order factor models.
    Fifth, it was tested whether the career exploration behavior scale of this study measures the same constructs in different gender group(male vs. female). A latent mean analysis by gender showed no significant difference in the levels of career exploration behavior.
    Sixth, the reliability of the career exploration behavior scale was analyzed. Cronbach α for the career exploration behavior scale was .93, ranging from .842 to .896 for the three components of career exploration behavior, and from .766 to .881 for their subcomponents. The 3-week test-retest reliability for the correlation analysis was .838, ranging from .752 to .807 for the three components of career exploration behavior, and from .776 to .831 for their subcomponents, showing stable reliability despite the passage of time.
    Seventh, career exploration behavior subtypes based on the level of subconponents of career exploration behavior were identified according to distribution of gender and grade, the level of career adaptability and career decision-making.
    Lastly, implications and application of the career exploration behavior scale developed in this study and career exploration behavior subtypes were discussed.
    번역하기

    This study is to develop career exploration behavior scale for undergraduate students and to identify reliability and validity for the scale so that it can identify subtypes of career exploration behavior and distribution of subtypes of career explora...

    This study is to develop career exploration behavior scale for undergraduate students and to identify reliability and validity for the scale so that it can identify subtypes of career exploration behavior and distribution of subtypes of career exploration behavior based on gender, grade, career adaptability, and career decision-making. To achieve its purpose, the following steps have conducted for the study.
    First, literature review, interview, and open-ended questionaries conducted to identify a concept of career exploration behavior and its components that reflect characteristics of Korean undergraduate students. career exploration behavior is composed of Career Enrichment Behavior(CEB), Career Specification Behavior(CSB), and Career Congruence Assessing Behavior(CCAB). CEB consists of two subcomponents such as Self Enrichment Behavior(SEB) and Vocation Enrichment Behavior(VEB), and CSB consists of two subcomponents such as Self Specification Behavior(SSB) and Vocation Specification Behavior(VSB). 63 preliminary items were chosen based on literature review, interview, open-ended questionaries, existing career exploration behavior scales, and expert evaluation.
    Second, 5 components(SEB, VEB, SSB, VSB, CCAB) and 32 items were identified after a pilot test with 375 undergraduate students and exploratory factor analysis.
    Third, through the main research conducted with 811 undergraduate students nationwide and the following confirmatory factor analysis, 25 items of the hierarchical second-order factor model were determined. career exploration behavior is composed of CEB(9 items), CSB(10 items), and CCAB(6 items). CEB consists of two subcomponents such as SEB(5 items) and VEB(4 items), and CSB consists of two subcomponents such as SSB(6 items) and VSB(4 items).
    Forth, The construct validity and concurrent validity were found acceptable as the career exploration behavior scale developed in this study was found to be positively correlated with other instruments such as Career Exploration Behavior(Choi, 2003), Career Preparation Type inventory for Korean College Student(K-CPTI), which were designed to assess similar constructs. Moreover, cross-validation was also verified with 323 undergraduate students for the hierarchical second-order factor models.
    Fifth, it was tested whether the career exploration behavior scale of this study measures the same constructs in different gender group(male vs. female). A latent mean analysis by gender showed no significant difference in the levels of career exploration behavior.
    Sixth, the reliability of the career exploration behavior scale was analyzed. Cronbach α for the career exploration behavior scale was .93, ranging from .842 to .896 for the three components of career exploration behavior, and from .766 to .881 for their subcomponents. The 3-week test-retest reliability for the correlation analysis was .838, ranging from .752 to .807 for the three components of career exploration behavior, and from .776 to .831 for their subcomponents, showing stable reliability despite the passage of time.
    Seventh, career exploration behavior subtypes based on the level of subconponents of career exploration behavior were identified according to distribution of gender and grade, the level of career adaptability and career decision-making.
    Lastly, implications and application of the career exploration behavior scale developed in this study and career exploration behavior subtypes were discussed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 차 례
    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 8
    • 차 례
    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구문제 8
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 9
    • 1. 진로탐색행동의 개요 9
    • 가. 진로탐색의 개념 9
    • 나. 진로탐색행동의 개념 14
    • 다. 진로의사결정과 진로탐색행동 19
    • 2. 대학생의 진로탐색행동 34
    • 가. 사회환경과 대학생의 진로탐색행동 35
    • 나. 대학생의 진로탐색행동과 진로적응력 39
    • 3. 대학생 진로탐색행동의 측정 도구 43
    • 가. 대학생 진로탐색행동의 평가요소 43
    • 나. 선행 개발된 진로탐색행동 관련 척도 개관 46
    • 다. 측정 도구의 하위요인과 문항 54
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 62
    • 1. 연구절차 62
    • 가. 척도 개발 63
    • 나. 진로탐색행동 군집유형 분석 77
    • 2. 연구대상 78
    • 가. 척도 개발 절차별 연구 대상 78
    • 나. 면담 조사 80
    • 다. 개방형 질문지 조사 81
    • 라. 예비 조사 82
    • 마. 본 조사 82
    • 바. 재검사 83
    • 사. 교차 타당도 조사 84
    • 3. 측정도구 85
    • 가. 한국 대학생 진로탐색행동 척도 85
    • 나. 진로준비유형 척도 86
    • 다. 한국형 진로적응력 척도 87
    • 4. 자료처리 89
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 90
    • 1. 대학생 진로탐색행동 척도 개발 90
    • 가. 문헌 고찰 결과 90
    • 나. 면담 조사 결과 98
    • 다. 개방형 질문지 조사 결과 109
    • 라. 선행 개발 척도 검토 결과 118
    • 마. 예비 문항 개발 125
    • 바. 내용 타당도 검증 및 예비 문항 확정 126
    • 사. 예비 조사 127
    • 2. 척도 타당도와 신뢰도 검증 135
    • 가. 타당도 검증 135
    • 나. 신뢰도 검증 154
    • 3. 진로탐색행동 하위요인에 따른 군집 분석 156
    • 가. 군집 유형 분석 156
    • 나. 성별 및 학년에 따른 군집 유형의 분포 차이 161
    • 다. 군집 유형별 진로적응력 및 진로결정확신의 차이 164
    • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 169
    • 1. 논의 169
    • 가. 척도의 구성요인과 타당도 및 신뢰도 169
    • 나. 진로탐색행동의 군집 유형별 특성 180
    • 2. 결론 및 제언 189
    • 가. 결론 189
    • 나. 시사점 및 제언 191
    • 참고문헌 195
    • 영문초록 216
    • 부록 219
    • <부록 1> 예비문항(70문항) 219
    • <부록 2> 수정된 예비문항(63문항) 223
    • <부록 3> 예비 조사 설문지 227
    • <부록 4> 본 조사 설문지 234
    • <부록 5> 예비 조사 기술 통계량 244
    • <부록 6> 대학생 진로탐색행동 척도 최종 문항 246
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼