RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Malcolm C. Fenwick의 根本主義 신학특성에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14179550

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 침례신학대학교, 2016

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 침례신학대학교 , 목회학과 , 2016. 8

    • 발행연도

      2016

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 형태사항

      ; 26 cm

    • 소장기관
      • 한국침례신학대학교 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Malcolm C. Fenwick came to Korea in 1889 as an independent missionary and ministered for 46 years. He had a profound effect on the Korean Baptist Convention. Fenwick not only founded the ‘Church of Christ in Korea’ which was the precursor of the current ‘Korea Baptist Convention’ but also led the denomination by training Christian leaders and sending out evangelists. Even with no direct successor to follow his mission, it is apparent to see that his influence was significant on the formation of Baptist in Korea. The Church of Christ in Korea had inherited his ideas on missions ever since he died. In addition, his thoughts had been passed around by leaders of the Korea Baptist Convention even after the KBC affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention. Therefore, it is very important to study his theology as well as who was M. C. Fenwick in order to understand the identity of the Korea Baptist Convention. In short, M. C. Fenwick was a missionary who adhered to fundamentalist theology.

    I started by describing the objectives this paper intended to achieve. First, this paper checked on the formation of Fenwick’s faith as well as how he was influenced by fundamentalism. Second, it confirmed that M. C. Fenwick was within the scope of the fundamentalist faith and theology of contemporary missionaries in Korea. Third, it checked the characteristics of M. C. Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism revealed in his main writings 「Church of Christ in Korea」(1911), 「Life in the Cup」(1917), and 「Bible Study」(1909). Fourth, this paper deals with M. C. Fenwick’s influence on the Korea Baptist Convention.

    In the first chapter, this paper looked at the people who had an effect on his faith and theological formation. These include Fenwick’s parents as well as those who had an influence on his conversion as well as his devotion to mission work. This paper also introduced the formation of Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism in the United States and Canada when he devoted to mission work. As a part of such effort, it analyzed the six leaders whom Fenwick met in the Niagara Bible Conference because they advocated theological fundamentalism which formed the backbone of Fenwick's thoughts and beliefs. In addition, it studied both Reverend A. J. Gordon’s A. J. Gordon’s Clarendon Baptist Church in Boston and then a nature of the Boston Missionary Training School which was in it. This paper continued to deal with the Ella Thing Memorial Mission sent by Clarendon Baptist Church and there relationship between ‘Korea Circuit Mission’ founded in 1894 and the Church of Christ in Korea.

    In Chapter 2, this paper analyzed Fenwick's writings in order to confirm his theological fundamentalism more concretely. It examined his fundamentalist beliefs revealed in his books 「The Church of Christ in Corea」, 「Life in the Cup」, and 「Bible Study」.

    In chapter 3, this paper investigated the influence of Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism on the Korea Baptist Convention and the resulting effects. Particularly in missiology, this chapter introduced his contemporary missionaries Underwood and Gale in other denominations so as to present the uniqueness of Fenwick although they shared fundamentalist tendencies.

    The fourth chapter is the conclusion of this paper, so the summary of the thesis and the cause of Fenwick’s fundamentalist faith as well as his uniqueness are presented. It also evaluated his contribution to missions in Korea. Also, it suggested advice for the desired development of the church for the future and gave follow-up study to build up sound theology.

    In conclusion, although he was not a scholar who studied theology professionally, he held fast to the theological fundamentalism which he learned during his growth, mission training, and continuing education. Fenwick’s fundamentalism is clearly shown in the books he authored. He had never gone astray from such thinking. In addition, he also never deviated much from the flow of fundamentalism in his work in the mission field. Someone may think that there was nothing particular about Fenwick when he is compared to other fundamentalists. However, there are several differences between Fenwick and fundamentalists in other denominations. He did not concentrate on the growth of the local church so he was not able to fulfill financial independence because of the traveling mission system. He, also failed to associate with other protestant denominations which resulted in isolated ministries. Fenwick’s contemporaries in other denominations had generally focused on three areas of the mission field: evangelism, education, and medical care. But Fenwick did not pay attention on the other two areas except for education. When it comes to the education ministry, unfortunately, he failed to prepare for the future of the denomination by preventing church members from pursuing secular education around 1926.

    Nevertheless, his ministry was excellent in several aspects: Faith Mission, Region-beyond Mission, Circuit System, Bible centered Mission and Church, and Christianity in the Korean context. Unfortunately, there is little data on Fenwick because he did his own mission work without a mission headquarters in the United States or Canada. Moreover, the headquarters of general assembly was located in Won-San (we are not able to visit it because this area is currently in North Korea). The general assembly was forced to be shut down because of refusing to visit the Yakasuni shrine during the Japanese occupation and this also contributed to the lack of data. More materials and subsequent research on Fenwick would clarify his faith and theology, which would result in accurate assessment of his achievement and limitation.
    번역하기

    Malcolm C. Fenwick came to Korea in 1889 as an independent missionary and ministered for 46 years. He had a profound effect on the Korean Baptist Convention. Fenwick not only founded the ‘Church of Christ in Korea’ which was the precursor of the c...

    Malcolm C. Fenwick came to Korea in 1889 as an independent missionary and ministered for 46 years. He had a profound effect on the Korean Baptist Convention. Fenwick not only founded the ‘Church of Christ in Korea’ which was the precursor of the current ‘Korea Baptist Convention’ but also led the denomination by training Christian leaders and sending out evangelists. Even with no direct successor to follow his mission, it is apparent to see that his influence was significant on the formation of Baptist in Korea. The Church of Christ in Korea had inherited his ideas on missions ever since he died. In addition, his thoughts had been passed around by leaders of the Korea Baptist Convention even after the KBC affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention. Therefore, it is very important to study his theology as well as who was M. C. Fenwick in order to understand the identity of the Korea Baptist Convention. In short, M. C. Fenwick was a missionary who adhered to fundamentalist theology.

    I started by describing the objectives this paper intended to achieve. First, this paper checked on the formation of Fenwick’s faith as well as how he was influenced by fundamentalism. Second, it confirmed that M. C. Fenwick was within the scope of the fundamentalist faith and theology of contemporary missionaries in Korea. Third, it checked the characteristics of M. C. Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism revealed in his main writings 「Church of Christ in Korea」(1911), 「Life in the Cup」(1917), and 「Bible Study」(1909). Fourth, this paper deals with M. C. Fenwick’s influence on the Korea Baptist Convention.

    In the first chapter, this paper looked at the people who had an effect on his faith and theological formation. These include Fenwick’s parents as well as those who had an influence on his conversion as well as his devotion to mission work. This paper also introduced the formation of Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism in the United States and Canada when he devoted to mission work. As a part of such effort, it analyzed the six leaders whom Fenwick met in the Niagara Bible Conference because they advocated theological fundamentalism which formed the backbone of Fenwick's thoughts and beliefs. In addition, it studied both Reverend A. J. Gordon’s A. J. Gordon’s Clarendon Baptist Church in Boston and then a nature of the Boston Missionary Training School which was in it. This paper continued to deal with the Ella Thing Memorial Mission sent by Clarendon Baptist Church and there relationship between ‘Korea Circuit Mission’ founded in 1894 and the Church of Christ in Korea.

    In Chapter 2, this paper analyzed Fenwick's writings in order to confirm his theological fundamentalism more concretely. It examined his fundamentalist beliefs revealed in his books 「The Church of Christ in Corea」, 「Life in the Cup」, and 「Bible Study」.

    In chapter 3, this paper investigated the influence of Fenwick’s theological fundamentalism on the Korea Baptist Convention and the resulting effects. Particularly in missiology, this chapter introduced his contemporary missionaries Underwood and Gale in other denominations so as to present the uniqueness of Fenwick although they shared fundamentalist tendencies.

    The fourth chapter is the conclusion of this paper, so the summary of the thesis and the cause of Fenwick’s fundamentalist faith as well as his uniqueness are presented. It also evaluated his contribution to missions in Korea. Also, it suggested advice for the desired development of the church for the future and gave follow-up study to build up sound theology.

    In conclusion, although he was not a scholar who studied theology professionally, he held fast to the theological fundamentalism which he learned during his growth, mission training, and continuing education. Fenwick’s fundamentalism is clearly shown in the books he authored. He had never gone astray from such thinking. In addition, he also never deviated much from the flow of fundamentalism in his work in the mission field. Someone may think that there was nothing particular about Fenwick when he is compared to other fundamentalists. However, there are several differences between Fenwick and fundamentalists in other denominations. He did not concentrate on the growth of the local church so he was not able to fulfill financial independence because of the traveling mission system. He, also failed to associate with other protestant denominations which resulted in isolated ministries. Fenwick’s contemporaries in other denominations had generally focused on three areas of the mission field: evangelism, education, and medical care. But Fenwick did not pay attention on the other two areas except for education. When it comes to the education ministry, unfortunately, he failed to prepare for the future of the denomination by preventing church members from pursuing secular education around 1926.

    Nevertheless, his ministry was excellent in several aspects: Faith Mission, Region-beyond Mission, Circuit System, Bible centered Mission and Church, and Christianity in the Korean context. Unfortunately, there is little data on Fenwick because he did his own mission work without a mission headquarters in the United States or Canada. Moreover, the headquarters of general assembly was located in Won-San (we are not able to visit it because this area is currently in North Korea). The general assembly was forced to be shut down because of refusing to visit the Yakasuni shrine during the Japanese occupation and this also contributed to the lack of data. More materials and subsequent research on Fenwick would clarify his faith and theology, which would result in accurate assessment of his achievement and limitation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. Earnest, Fisher, J., “제임스 스캇 게일(1863-” 「부경교회사 연구」, 제53호 (2015. 1): 137, , 1937

    2. “달편지.”, 김태식, 「한국기독교사 연구」, 11 : 19-21, , 1986

    3. 현대신학논쟁, 목창균, 서울: 두란노, , 2003

    4. 한국기독교회사, 민경배, 대한기독교서회, 서울: 대한기독교출판사, , 1982

    5. 한국침례교회사, 허긴, 침례신학대학교 출판부, 대전: 침례신학대학교출판부, , 1999

    6. 『종말론 논쟁』, 목창균, 두란노, 서울: 두란노, , 1998

    7. 언더우드 자료집I, 이만열, 옥성득, 서울: 연세대학교출판부, , 2005

    8. 「한국기독교사」, 김명배, 서울: 북 코리아, , 2010

    9. 『평양대부흥운동』, 박용규, 서울: 생명의 말씀사, , 2000

    10. 대한기독교침례회사, 김용해, 大韓基督敎浸禮會 總會, n. p.: 대한기독교침례회총회, , 1964

    1. Earnest, Fisher, J., “제임스 스캇 게일(1863-” 「부경교회사 연구」, 제53호 (2015. 1): 137, , 1937

    2. “달편지.”, 김태식, 「한국기독교사 연구」, 11 : 19-21, , 1986

    3. 현대신학논쟁, 목창균, 서울: 두란노, , 2003

    4. 한국기독교회사, 민경배, 대한기독교서회, 서울: 대한기독교출판사, , 1982

    5. 한국침례교회사, 허긴, 침례신학대학교 출판부, 대전: 침례신학대학교출판부, , 1999

    6. 『종말론 논쟁』, 목창균, 두란노, 서울: 두란노, , 1998

    7. 언더우드 자료집I, 이만열, 옥성득, 서울: 연세대학교출판부, , 2005

    8. 「한국기독교사」, 김명배, 서울: 북 코리아, , 2010

    9. 『평양대부흥운동』, 박용규, 서울: 생명의 말씀사, , 2000

    10. 대한기독교침례회사, 김용해, 大韓基督敎浸禮會 總會, n. p.: 대한기독교침례회총회, , 1964

    11. 공주침례교회 100년사, 안중모, 공주: 정신출판사, , 1996

    12. 「침례교회와 역사」, 김승진, 대전: 침례신학대학교 출판부, , 2005

    13. “피어선의 선교관.”, 권평, 복음과 신학 , 제13권 (통권 제13호) : 170-89, , 2011

    14. 침례교 여전도회 역사, 조혜도, 왕은신, 서울: 한국침례회 전국여전도연합회, , 1988

    15. 한국교회 역사와 신학, 이상규, 서울: 생명의 양식, , 2014

    16. 「토박이 신앙산맥」 I, 전택부, 서울: 대한기독교서회, , 1977

    17. 『한국기독교사 특강』, 이만열, 서울: 성경읽기사, , 1993

    18. “한국어 성경번역사.”, 김중은, 「기독교사상」, 년 2월, 23-33, , 1993

    19. 「한국 기독교 성장사」, 김광수, 기독교문사, 서울: 기독교문사, , 1976

    20. 『한국개신교 근본주의』, 배덕만, 대장간, 서울: 대장간, , 2010

    21. 「한국기독교회사」, 18권, 김인수, 서울: 한국장로교출판사, , 1995

    22. “언더우드의 문서활동.”, 서정민, 「언더우드 기념강연집」. 언더우드기념 사업회 편. 서울: 연세대학교 출판부, , 2011

    23. “한국침례교의 종말론.”, 피영민, 한국침례교의 신학적 특성 . 침례교신학연구소 편, 164-87. 대전: 침례신학대학교, , 2003

    24. 「한국교회 처음 이야기」, 이덕주, 홍성사, 서울: 홍성사, , 2006

    25. 『한국 기독교회의 역사』, 박효생, 장로회신대학교, 서울: 장로회신학대학교 출판부, , 1997

    26. 복음주의 신학과 한국교회, 김의환, 서울: 총신대학교 출판부, , 2004

    27. 한국침례교회의 산 증인들, 김장배, 서울: 침례회출판사, , 1981

    28. “성경의 우리말 번역사.”, 이덕주, 빛과 소금 , 년 1월, 66-9, , 1993

    29. “종말론의 어제와 오늘.”, 이명희, 「뱁티스트」, 년 9-10월, 21-2, , 1995

    30. “침례교의 정신과 신앙.”, 정진황, 「뱁티스트」, 년 5-6월): 16-7, , 1992

    31. 『조선예수교장로회사기』, 차재명, 경성: 조선예수교장로회 총회, , 1928

    32. 『한민족독립운동사연구』, 박영석, 서울: 일조각, , 1982

    33. 한국기독교성령백년인물사, 안준배, 쿰란, 서울: 쿰란출판사, , 2009

    34. 『초기 한국기독교사 연구』, 이덕주, 한국기독교역사연구소, 서울: 한국기독교역사연구소, , 1995

    35. 「한국기독교 해방 십년사」, 김양선, 서울: 대한예수교장로회총회교육부, , 1935

    36. “말콤 펜위크의 한국선교.”, 민경배, 연세대학교 연합신학대학원, 현대와 신학 , 17집 : 59-81, , 1993

    37. “언더우드의 신앙과 사상.”, 장훈태, 석사학위논문. 아세아연합신학교 신학대학원, , 1997

    38. “피어선의 성경연구 원리.”, 안명준, 평택대학교 피어선기념성경연구원, 복음과 신학 , 제13권 (통권 제13호) : 190-212, , 2011

    39. “한국침례교 신학의 흐름.”, 이상배, 연구소 편 한국 침례교와 신앙의 특성 . 침례교신학 . 대전: 침례신학대학교출판부, , 2000

    40. 한국교회 초기 부흥운동: -1907, 이창기, 서울: 보이스사, 2006, , 1903

    41. Clark. 한국교회사 , 개정증보판, Allen, D., 서울: 대한기독교서회, , 1973

    42. “게일 목사와 청년 이승만.”, 김낙환, 「게일 목사 탄생 150주년 기념 논문집」. 서울: 연동교회, , 2013

    43. 한국교회의 허와 실, 근본주의, 배덕만, 대한기독교서회, 「기독교사상」, 제635호, 2011년 11월, 53., , 2011

    44. “기독교대한침례교회 연혁.”, 장일수, , 1969

    45. “대한기독교회와 교권 파동”, 허긴, 복음과 실천 , 19집 (1996): 556-81, , 1914

    46. 기독교 세계선교사 . 박광철 역, Kane, H., 서울: 생명의 말씀사, , 1981

    47. 「침례교 찬송가 복음과 찬미」, 김남수, 침례신학대학교 출판부, 대전: 침례신학대학교출판부, , 2005

    48. “성경번역 선교사들의 활동상.”, 정민영, 「빛과 소금」, 년 1월): 70-5, , 1993

    49. “한국침례교회 약사와 정체성.”, 조효훈, 다문화시대에 다시 보는 한국침례교회 . 침례교신학연구소 편, 13-41. 대전: 침례신학대학교 출판부, , 2009

    50. 세대주의란 무엇인가? . 황영철 역, Bass, C. B., 서울: 생명의말씀사, , 1988

    51. 「초대 언더우드 선교사의 생애」, 이광린, 서울: 연세대학교 출판부, , 1991

    52. “게일 목사의 신학사상과 유산.”, 안교성, 「게일목사 탄생 150주년 기념 논문집」. 서울: 연동교회, , 2013

    53. 「개화기의 한미관계」. 이광린 역, Harrington, F. H., 서울: 일조각, , 1982

    54. “말콤 펜윅의 신학적 특성 분석.”, 김용국, 「뱁티스트」 년 9-10월): 34-45, , 2003

    55. 「한국침례교사상사」. 수정증보판, 김용국, 대전: 침례신학대학교 출판부, , 2009

    56. “게일 목사의 목회와 에큐메니즘.”, 이용민, 「게일목사 탄생 150주년 기념 논문집」. 서울: 연동교회, , 2013

    57. “19세기 재침례파의 반-국교도운동.”, 최봉기, 「수침논집」, 1집 : 89-108, , 1991

    58. “신약성경의 침례와 한국침례교회.”, 고재봉, 「복음과 실천」, 14집 : 13-36, , 1991

    59. “언더우드의 교육정신과 연세교육.”, 김인회, 「언더우드 업회 편 기념강연집」. 언더우드 기념사 . 서울: 연세대학교 출판부, , 2011

    60. “문화로 읽는 Malcolm C. Fenwick의 선교.”, 장수한, 침례신학대학교 출판부, 「복음과 실천」, 45집 봄): 207-36, , 2010

    61. “언더우드의 한국선교에 대한 연구.”, 백경천, 연세대학교 연합신학대학원, 석사학위논문, 연세대학교 연합신학대학원, , 1991

    62. 새로 쓴 한국그리스도인들의 개종이야기, 이덕주, 한국기독교역사연구소, 서울: 한국기독교역사연구소, , 2003

    63. 「숨겨진 한국교회사: 민족교회의 발생」, 김대인, 한들, 서울: 한들출판사, , 1995

    64. 「착목쟈: 게일의 삶과 선교」, 1권, 2권, 유영식, 서울: 도서출판 진흥, , 2013

    65. “한국장로교 총회 100년, 그 빛과 그림자.”, 서정민, 「기독교사상」, 638호 년 2월): 190-9, , 2012

    66. 한국개신교회사 1832-서울: 연세대학교 출판부, 백낙준, 1979, , 1910

    67. 「아더 피어선의 생애와 신앙」. 보이스사 역, Pierson, D. L., 서울: 보이스사, , 1986

    68. 말콤 C. 펜윅: 한국기독교 토착화의 거보(巨步), 최봉기, 서울: 요단출판사, , 1996

    69. “세대주의 종말론이 한국교회에 미친 영향.”, 김형신, 대학원 석사학위논문, 호남신학대학교 신학, , 1999

    70. “「복음찬미」 특징과 초기 한국찬송 연구.”, 김남수, 한국기독교학회, 「한국기독교신학논총」, 30집 : 555-80, , 2003

    71. 「침례교 신학: 침례교인의 신앙과 신학유산」, 김용복, 침례신학대학교 출판부, 대전: 침례신학대학교 출판부, , 2006

    72. Roberts. 아더 피어선과 복음주의 운동 . 박달진 역, Dana L., 서울: 양서각, , 1988

    73. “한국교회 선교정책으로서의 네비우스 방법.”, 박용규, 신학지남사, 신학지남 , 69권 3집 : 57-83, , 2002

    74. “서경조의 신도와 전도와 송천교회 설립역사.”, 서경조, 신학지남사, 신학지남 , 7권 4호 : 87-106, , 1925

    75. “펜윅이 우리말 성경에서 사용한 언어의 특징.”, 도한호, 한국침례교와 신앙의 특성 . 침례교신학연구소 편. 대전: 침례신학대학교출판부, , 2000

    76. “강경지역의 기독교: 초기 역사와 교파별 특성.”, 김흥수, 한국기독교역사연구소, 「한국기독교와 역사」, 31집 : 69-93, , 2009

    77. “언더우드의 한국에서의 교육활동과 한국인식.”, 윤경로, 「언더우드 기념강연집」. 서울: 연세대학교 출판부, , 2011

    78. “선교사 기일의 생애와 한국기독교에 끼친 공헌.”, 주홍근, 석사학위논문, 피어슨신학원, , 1984

    79. 시대를 앞서간 선교사 말콤 출판부 펜윅 . 개정증보판, 안희열, 대전: 침례신학대학교, , 2010

    80. 초기 미국선교사 연구 1884-서울: 한국기독교역사연구소, 류대영, 2013, , 1910

    81. “「사경공부」에 나타난 Malcolm C. Fenwick의 신앙과 신학.”, 김용복, 「복음과 실천」, 47집 봄): 109-38,111, , 2011

    82. 학“아」더 피어선과 호레이스 언더우드: 그들의 만남과 협력과 유산, 조상열신, ” 「복음과 , 제13권 년 12월): 140-152, , 2011

    83. “한국 근대화 연구 과정에서 캐나다 선교사들이 끼친 공헌과 평가.”, 문영석, 캐나다 , 10집 : 115-30, , 2002

    84. 「은혜의 발자취: 대학교출판부 한국 침례교회 총회 신학교의 역사와 회고」, 김갑수, 침례신학, , 2013

    85. 종교 신학적 관점에서 본 말콤 펜윅의 구원론과 초기 한국교회의 선교적 성과, 안희열, 한국복음주의신학회, 「성경과 신학」, 55권 : 135-63, , 2010

    86. 「인물로 보는 한국 교회사 복음 선교 기독교역사박물관 120년, 신앙 위인 120명」, 한영제, 서울: 한국, , 2006

    87. “미국에 있어서 근본주의 신앙운동의 역사적 지남」 전개와 세대주의와의 관계,”, 홍치모, 「신학 , 286호 봄호): 314-22, , 2006

    88. 은박퇴사기 은념퇴논기문념집논 발문간집위원회. 한국침례교회와 역사: 회고와 성찰: 해송, 박허사긴, 허긴, 대전: 침례신학대학교 출판부, , 2010

    89. 어머니의 백성이 나의 백성이 되고’ 카나다 교회의 한국 선교, 1889-1935: 윌리엄 맥켄지와 말콤 펜윅의 선교를 중심으로, 탁지일, 교회사학 , 2집 : 207-16., , 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼