RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    종교 신학적 관점에서 본 말콤 펜윅의 구원론과 초기 한국교회의 선교적 성과 = The Soteriology of Malcolm C. Fenwick in the Perspective of a Theology of Religions and the Missionary Results in the Early Korean Churches

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82420413

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In today`s world, there is constant controversy concerning the soteriology of the world religions among the scholars of missions. They have continuously asked whether or not it is the best way to force us to accept only exclusivism in a postmodernism world. There are increasing scholars who have insisted not to demand exclusivism in a postmodernism world rather than in a modernism world. For example, some scholar declares that all religions are equal-that none can or should claim exclusivity. Therefore, the third Lausanne Movement opens in Cape Town, the Republic of South Africa in October this year. At that time, the main issue, of course, is uniqueness of Christ in a postmodernism world. The world religions seem to be assignments for Christianity to overcome to build up the Kingdom of God. The soteriology of the world religions in the perspective of a theology of religions can be divided as views of four types: (1) exclusivism; (2) inclusivism; (3) universalism; (4) pluralism. The writer wants to find wisdom from Malcolm C. Fenwick who had planted the seeds of the Gospel in Korea 120 years ago. Definitely, Fenwick was an exclusivist. To be frank with you, he was a realistic exlusivist. Fenwick did not define the world religions as `evil,` but accepted as `friend` because he tried to find the point of contact between Christianity and other religions. He used the point of contact as the bridge of the Gospel, and produced the affluent fruits of the Word. In particular, when Fenwick was working as a missionary in Korea from 1889, both shamanism and Confucianism had already taken root deep inKorean society for a long time. However, he found out the point of contact between Christianity and non-Christianity religions, and then he obtained an abundant crop of the Gospel. First of all, this paper has a purpose to study the Biblical views and theological concept of Fenwick,and to find out how to understand and access shamanism and Confucianism that had already taken root in Korean society. In addition, this article aims at finding out to influence his soteriology on the early Korean churches while Fenwick was living in Korea for 46 years, and proposing the desired direction for the 21st century Korea missions.
    번역하기

    In today`s world, there is constant controversy concerning the soteriology of the world religions among the scholars of missions. They have continuously asked whether or not it is the best way to force us to accept only exclusivism in a postmodernism ...

    In today`s world, there is constant controversy concerning the soteriology of the world religions among the scholars of missions. They have continuously asked whether or not it is the best way to force us to accept only exclusivism in a postmodernism world. There are increasing scholars who have insisted not to demand exclusivism in a postmodernism world rather than in a modernism world. For example, some scholar declares that all religions are equal-that none can or should claim exclusivity. Therefore, the third Lausanne Movement opens in Cape Town, the Republic of South Africa in October this year. At that time, the main issue, of course, is uniqueness of Christ in a postmodernism world. The world religions seem to be assignments for Christianity to overcome to build up the Kingdom of God. The soteriology of the world religions in the perspective of a theology of religions can be divided as views of four types: (1) exclusivism; (2) inclusivism; (3) universalism; (4) pluralism. The writer wants to find wisdom from Malcolm C. Fenwick who had planted the seeds of the Gospel in Korea 120 years ago. Definitely, Fenwick was an exclusivist. To be frank with you, he was a realistic exlusivist. Fenwick did not define the world religions as `evil,` but accepted as `friend` because he tried to find the point of contact between Christianity and other religions. He used the point of contact as the bridge of the Gospel, and produced the affluent fruits of the Word. In particular, when Fenwick was working as a missionary in Korea from 1889, both shamanism and Confucianism had already taken root deep inKorean society for a long time. However, he found out the point of contact between Christianity and non-Christianity religions, and then he obtained an abundant crop of the Gospel. First of all, this paper has a purpose to study the Biblical views and theological concept of Fenwick,and to find out how to understand and access shamanism and Confucianism that had already taken root in Korean society. In addition, this article aims at finding out to influence his soteriology on the early Korean churches while Fenwick was living in Korea for 46 years, and proposing the desired direction for the 21st century Korea missions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 침례신학연구소, "한국침례교회와 신앙의 특성" 침례신학대학교출판부 2000

    2 허 긴, "한국침례교회사" 침례신학대학교출판부 1999

    3 안희열, "시대를 앞서 간 선교사 말콤 펜윅" 침례신학대학교출판부 2006

    4 Fenwick,Malcolm C, "사경공부" 1909

    5 Sanders, John., "What About Those Who Have Never Heard?" IL 1955

    6 Tizon,Al, "Transformation after Lausanne" Wipf & Stock Publishers 2008

    7 Hume,Robert E, "The World’s Living Religions" Charles Scribners’ Sons 1959

    8 Stanley,Brian, "The World Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1910" William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 2009

    9 Fenwick,Malcolm C, "The Church of Christ in Corea:A Pioneer Missionary’s Own Story" George H. Doran Company 1911

    10 Sanders, John., "No Other Name" William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 1992

    1 침례신학연구소, "한국침례교회와 신앙의 특성" 침례신학대학교출판부 2000

    2 허 긴, "한국침례교회사" 침례신학대학교출판부 1999

    3 안희열, "시대를 앞서 간 선교사 말콤 펜윅" 침례신학대학교출판부 2006

    4 Fenwick,Malcolm C, "사경공부" 1909

    5 Sanders, John., "What About Those Who Have Never Heard?" IL 1955

    6 Tizon,Al, "Transformation after Lausanne" Wipf & Stock Publishers 2008

    7 Hume,Robert E, "The World’s Living Religions" Charles Scribners’ Sons 1959

    8 Stanley,Brian, "The World Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1910" William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 2009

    9 Fenwick,Malcolm C, "The Church of Christ in Corea:A Pioneer Missionary’s Own Story" George H. Doran Company 1911

    10 Sanders, John., "No Other Name" William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 1992

    11 Terry,John Mark, "Missiology" Broadman & Holman Publishers 1988

    12 Stott,John., "Making Christ Known: Historic Mission Documents from the Lausanne Movement, 1974-1989" William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company 1989

    13 Fenwick,Malcolm C, "Life in the Cup. Mesa Grande" Church of Christ in Corea Extension 1917

    14 Piper, John, "Let the Nations Be Glad!: The Supremacy of God in Missions" Baker Books, 1993

    15 Nash, Ronald H, "Is Jesus the Only Savior?" Zondervan Publishing House 1954

    16 Erickson, Millard J, "How Shall They Be Saved?" Baker Books 1996

    17 Hick,John, "God Has Many Names" Macmillan Press 1980

    18 Gairdner,W.H.T, "Edinburgh 1910:An Account and Interpretations of the World Missionary Conference" Turnbull and Spears 1910

    19 Yang,Y.C, "China’s Religious Heritage" Abingdon Cokesbury Press 1943

    20 Smith, Ebbie C, "An Evangelical Approach to the Theology of Religions" 44 (44): 6-23, 2002

    21 "A New Heart Evangelization" Lausanne Committee for World Evangelizat 2004

    22 안희열, "1910년 에딘버러 세계선교사대회 100년 평가" 연세대학교 신과대학 연합신학대학원 59 : 173-199, 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.49 0.63 0.17
    더보기

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼