The purpose of this study is to examine the notion and characteristics of contemporary Korean blends, and to verify the significance for word-formation discussion. Blend is one of the neologisms appearing actively today, and blending is a complex proc...
The purpose of this study is to examine the notion and characteristics of contemporary Korean blends, and to verify the significance for word-formation discussion. Blend is one of the neologisms appearing actively today, and blending is a complex process that includes clipping more than two words and combining them. So far, blends have not been considered as grammatical phenomenon from previous studies. In this regard, our discussion is invaluable, because we highlighted that formation of blends reflects human cognitive processes and possibility of having relationship with word-formation system.
The methodology to figure out the notion and characteristics of blends is collection and analyses for the neologism sourcebooks from National Institute of Korean Language, previous studies, and related information from the Internet. Also, given that blends can be originated from speaker's onomasiological desire, we consider blends have prototypicality. Based on these point of view, the list and characteristics of typical blends are presented and compared with clipped words, compounds and acronyms in chapter 3.
In chapter 4, the characteristics of blends are examined from the aspects of phonology, form, and semantics. It is noteworthy that the tendency of maintaining number of syllables is violated when phonemes are overlapped, although phonological characteristics are rarely revealed due to the properties of Korean. The clipping process in forming words is carried out regardless of the internal composition. There are tendency of maintaining the number of syllables, so blends tend not to be formed longer than the forming words. The main semantic characteristic is the semantic relation between two forming words. The most common type is endocentric, and there are also exocentric, appositional and coordinative relations.
In chapter 5, we discussed the status and significance of blends especially on the aspect of formation and change. Blends are formed to effectively fulfill the three purposes; meaning interpretability, language economy, and wordness. Since the status of the components is not consistent and there is not a single morphological operation on that, blending cannot be located in the existing word-formation system. But some of the components are engaged in blending so that type frequency increases. Accordingly, they form the structural schema and accompany specialization of meaning and independence in formation. Words including these components show relative regularity, so they can be considered shifting to the word-formation system. We call these components as 'Pseudo-suffix', and some of them acquire the status of suffix so that form derivatives. Therefore, by explaining such process of change on blends within the grammaticalization theory, these process can be understood as general and universal.