정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도 및 부적응적인 인지적 정서조절이 대학생의 문제성 음주에 미치는 영향 = The Effect of Emotional Clarity, Emotional Intensity and Maladjustment Cognitive Emotion Regulation on College Student' Problem Drinking

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도 및 부적응적 인지적 정서조절이 대학생의 문제성 음주에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 진행되었다. 이를 통해, 본 연구에서는 대학생들의 문제성 음주에 영향을 미치는 다양한 요인들 중 정서적인 특성을 고려한 치료 프로그램을 통해 궁극적으로 적응적이고 건강한 삶을 영위할 수 있도록 체계적인 치료적 개입에 대한 기초자료를 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 서울, 경기, 대전, 충남권에 소재한 대학교에 재학 중인 남녀 대학생을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여, 최종적으로 300개의 자료를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 측정 도구는 첫째, 알코올 사용 장애 및 음주문제의 위험성이 있는 성인을 선별하기 위해 세계보건기구(WHO)에서 개발한 알코올 사용 장애 선별도구(Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, AUDIT)를 사용하였다. 둘째, 지속적이고 안정적인 정서인식의 개인차를 측정하기 위해서는 Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey, Palfai(1995)가 개발하고 이수정과 이훈구(1997)가 번안하여 타당화한 한국판 특질 초기분 척도(TMMS : Trait Meta-Mood Scale)를 사용하였다. 셋째, 개인이 정서를 경험하는 특징적 폭, 혹은 강도를 측정하기 위해서는 Larsen, Diener(1987)가 개발한 정서강도 척도는 총 40문항을 사용하였다. 넷째, 개인의 인지적 정서 조절을 알아보기 위해서는 Garnefski 등(2001)이 개발한 인지적 정서조절 전략 질문지(Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire)를 김소희(2004)가 번안, 수정한 척도를 사용하였다. 수집된 자료는 PASW 18.0 프로그램을 활용하여 분석의 목적에 따라 상관분석을, Mplus 6.0을 사용하여 경로분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다.   첫째, 주요 변인들 간의 상관분석을 실시한 결과, 정서인식의 명확성은 정서강도와 정적상관을, 부적응적 인지적 정서조절과는 부적상관을, 정서강도는 부적응적 인지적 정서조절과 정적상관이 나타났다. 둘째, 정서인식의 명확성과 정서강도는 부적응적 인지적 정서조절에 직접적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났으며, 부적응적 인지적 정서조절의 사용은 문제성 음주에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 대학생의 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도, 부적응적 인지적 정서조절이 문제성 음주에 어떠한 경로를 통하여 영향을 미치는지 살펴보기 위해 경로모형을 검증한 결과, 모형의 적합도는 유의미하였다. 정서인식의 명확성과 정서강도가 부적응적 인지적 정서조절에 영향을 주었으며 이는 문제성 음주에 영향을 주었다. 즉, 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도, 부적응적 인지적 정서조절이 문제성 음주에 영향을 미치는 유용한 변인임을 확인할 수 있었다. 이는 정서적 특성을 바탕으로 한 문제성 음주행위 예측을 가능하게 함으로써 대학생의 문제성 음주 예방을 위한 다양한 개입전략이 이루어질 수 있음을 시사한다. 이러한 결과를 중심으로 논의와 향후 연구에 대한 제안점 등을 논의하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of emotional clarity, emotional intensity and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation on problem drinking among college students. By investigating these effects, this study aims to provide basic data about systematic therapeutic intervention to ultimately enjoy an adaptive and healthy life through a therapy program which considers emotional characteristics of various factors to influence problem drinking among college students. For this study, a survey was conducted targeting male and female students in colleges located in Seoul, Gyeongki, Daejeon and Choongnam and finally, 300 questionnaires were analyzed. As measurement scales of this research, first, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test(AUDIT), developed by WHO was used to select adults with alcohol use disorders and risk of drinking problems. Second, for measuring individual differences of continuous and stable emotional clarity, the Trait Meta-Mood Scale(TMMS), developed by Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey and Palfai(1995), and adapted and validated by Lee, Soo-jeong and Lee, Hoon-gu(1997) was used. Third, for measuring the characteristic width or intensity of emotion which individuals experience, the Emotional Intensity Scale consisting of total 40 questions, developed by Larsen and Diener(1987) was used. Fourth, for examining cognitive emotion regulation of individuals, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, developed by Garnefski et al.,(2001), and adapted and modified by Kim, So-hee(2004) was used. For analysis of collected data, correlation analysis was carried out using the PASW 18.0 program, according to the purpose of analysis and path analysis was carried out using the Mplus 6.0 program. The study results are as follows.   First, the result of correlation analysis among major variables showed that emotional clarity had a positive correlation with emotional intensity and a negative correlation with maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation, and emotional intensity had a positive correlation with maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation. Second, emotional clarity and emotional intensity had a direct influence on maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation and the use of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation influenced problem drinking. Third, the path model was verified to see what path emotional clarity, emotional intensity and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation of college students passed through to influence problem drinking. As the result, the goodness-of-fit of the model was significant. Emotional clarity and emotional intensity influenced maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation and this influenced problem drinking. In conclusion, it was identified that emotional clarity, emotional intensity and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation were useful variables to influence problem drinking. This implies that various intervention strategies for prevention of problem drinking among college students can be implemented by facilitating the prediction of problem drinking behaviors, based on emotional characteristics. On the basis of these findings, a suggestion for further research was discussed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론·····································1
• 1.1 연구의 필요성 및 목적·····································1
• 1.2 연구문제 및 가설·····································5
• 2. 이론적 배경·····································6
• 2.1 문제성 음주·····································6
• 2.2 대학생과 문제성 음주·····································8
• 2.3 정서·····································10
• 2.3.1 정서의 정의·····································10
• 2.3.2 정서인식의 명확성·····································11
• 2.3.3 정서강도·····································12
• 2.3.4 인지적 정서조절 전략·····································13
• 2.4 문제성 음주와 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도 및 인지적 정서조절의 관계············16
• 3. 연구방법·····································18
• 3.1 연구설계·····································18
• 3.2 연구대상·····································18
• 3.3 측정도구·····································19
• 3.4 분석방법·····································22
• 4. 연구결과·····································23
• 4.1 인구통계학적 특성·····································23
• 4.2 주요 변인에 대한 기술분석 및 상관분석·····································23
• 4.3 대학생의 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도, 부적응적 인지적 정서조절과 문제성 음주 간의 경로모형 및 적합도 분석·····································24
• 4.3.1 연구모형의 적합도 검증·····································24
• 4.3.2 연구모형의 경로 분석·····································25
• 5. 논의 및 제언·····································27
• 참고문헌·····································33
• 부록·····································42
• Abstract·····································52