RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    지역사회서비스투자사업의 성과에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12968233

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 광주대학교 대학원, 2012

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 광주대학교 사회복지전문대학원 , 사회복지학 , 2012. 8

    • 발행연도

      2012

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      361.8 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 기타서명

      A Study on the Influence Factors of the Outcomes of the Community Service Investment

    • 형태사항

      viii, 179 p. : 도표, 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p.147-161

    • 소장기관
      • 광주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is figured out effect of community service investment project

    We figured out among the selectiveness of project, service quality, satisfaction, interactive effectiveness focused on community service investment project participant, examined mediating effect between service quality and satisfaction. Also, relative effect analysis of effect factors and moderating effect of personal character.

    The target population in this research is 1,390 service user and service provider who participants community service investment project in jeollanam-do, 2009. this study totally analysed 1,145.

    The analysed results in this study are as follow:

    First, participation type is significant to service quality, satisfaction, outcome. Also, selectiveness of project is significant to service quality, satisfaction. service quality is significant to outcome.
    Second, participation's type and selectiveness and outcome is mediating effect to service quality and satisfaction.

    Third, service user, service provider, participation type and selectiveness of project are relatively different effectiveness between service quality and satisfaction.

    Forth, personal character such as sex, age, household, type of reception, using experience are moderating effect to outcome of community service investment project

    Based on this analysis, implement is as follow

    First, outcome evaluation of community service investment project should focused on multi dimension evaluation of service provider.

    Second, community service investment project concerned with community characteristic of governance

    Third, we need to system development and delivery system for empowerment to participate community service investment project.

    Forth, we need to case management and outcome management system for community service investment project.

    Fifth, we need to investment incommodity services for business performance management system should be revised.

    Sixth, community service providers in terms of investment projects on the consumer side of the distribution of administrative flexibility and awareness of public administration considering switching is required.
    Seventh, community service consumer and provider of investment projects in terms of business performance to identify the factors that affect follow-up studies need to be made.

    Eighth, community service evaluation of investment projects on the consumer side considering the evaluation criteria should be more specific studies.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is figured out effect of community service investment project We figured out among the selectiveness of project, service quality, satisfaction, interactive effectiveness focused on community service investment project p...

    The purpose of this study is figured out effect of community service investment project

    We figured out among the selectiveness of project, service quality, satisfaction, interactive effectiveness focused on community service investment project participant, examined mediating effect between service quality and satisfaction. Also, relative effect analysis of effect factors and moderating effect of personal character.

    The target population in this research is 1,390 service user and service provider who participants community service investment project in jeollanam-do, 2009. this study totally analysed 1,145.

    The analysed results in this study are as follow:

    First, participation type is significant to service quality, satisfaction, outcome. Also, selectiveness of project is significant to service quality, satisfaction. service quality is significant to outcome.
    Second, participation's type and selectiveness and outcome is mediating effect to service quality and satisfaction.

    Third, service user, service provider, participation type and selectiveness of project are relatively different effectiveness between service quality and satisfaction.

    Forth, personal character such as sex, age, household, type of reception, using experience are moderating effect to outcome of community service investment project

    Based on this analysis, implement is as follow

    First, outcome evaluation of community service investment project should focused on multi dimension evaluation of service provider.

    Second, community service investment project concerned with community characteristic of governance

    Third, we need to system development and delivery system for empowerment to participate community service investment project.

    Forth, we need to case management and outcome management system for community service investment project.

    Fifth, we need to investment incommodity services for business performance management system should be revised.

    Sixth, community service providers in terms of investment projects on the consumer side of the distribution of administrative flexibility and awareness of public administration considering switching is required.
    Seventh, community service consumer and provider of investment projects in terms of business performance to identify the factors that affect follow-up studies need to be made.

    Eighth, community service evaluation of investment projects on the consumer side considering the evaluation criteria should be more specific studies.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 필요성 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 5
    • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 구성 6
    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 필요성 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 5
    • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 구성 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 7
    • 제1절 사회서비스 7
    • 제2절 지역사회서비스투자사업 28
    • 제3절 지역사회서비스투자사업의 성과 영향요인 34
    • 제4절 선행연구 59
    • 제3장 연구방법 62
    • 제1절 연구모형 및 가설 62
    • 제2절 측정 도구 67
    • 제3절 조사 분석 방법 72
    • 제4장 연구결과 77
    • 제1절 표본의 특성 77
    • 제2절 탐색적 요인분석 84
    • 제3절 확인적 요인분석 94
    • 제4절 잠재변수 간 상관관계분석 96
    • 제5절 연구모형 분석 98
    • 제6절 가설검증 100
    • 제5장 결론 및 논의 133
    • 제1절 연구결과 요약 133
    • 제2절 논의 136
    • 제3절 제언 143
    • 참고문헌 147
    • 부 록 162
    • 감사의글 178
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼