부동산경매에서 유치권제도의 개선에 관한 연구 : 부당한 유치권을 중심으로 = (A) study on the improvement of the lien system in the real estate auction : focused on the unjust lien

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The lien is the real right granted by way of security legally admitted as a matter or course if a given requirement is established regardless of the will of the parties to contract. It is to realize a 'principle of fairness that laws admit this system. But it has been positioned as the system never fair in practical affairs, becoming a serious problem. Especially, the auction procedures are delayed due to the allegation of the unfair lien in the practical affairs of the auction or rather the unjust lienor come to get profits in some cases.
The false/ exaggerated lien, the lien contrary to Prinzip von Treu und Glauben, and the allegation of the unjust lien by the claim of the lessee frequently come to occur because the deficiencies of this system are misapplied.
To improve the problem of this lien, it is necessary to investigate it by dividing it in terms of the substantial law and the procedural law.
Its problems in terms of the substantial law include the problem of unstability of the disclosure system, the problem of Abernahmeprinzip and the repayment of the highest priority and the like. Its problems in terms of the procedural law include the perfunctory investigation of the present situation, the deficiency of appraisal, the lack of public confidence of the list of objects for sale, the declaration of the right to the lien and the like.
These problems in terms of substantial and procedural laws cause the following reverse effects: the phenomenon of reduction of the successful price tendered; the delay of the transfer and eviction suit; the avoidance of participation in the bid due to the declaration of the lien; the seller's burden of transfer of secured receivables; the economic loss of the interested parties, national loss; and the like.
To resolve these problems and reverse effects, this study attempted to investigate the plan to improve the lien system in terms of the substantial law.
First, it is necessary to introduce the lien registration system.
Second, it is necessary to introduce the legal mortgage system.
Third, it is necessary to improve the problem of Abernahmeprinzip.
Fourth, it is necessary to apply the prior lien.
Improvements of the problem in terms of the procedural law are as follows: First, it is necessary to make a real investigation of the present situation.
Second, it is necessary to improve the system of lien appraisal.
Third, it is necessary to enhance the public confidence of the list of objects for sale.
Fourth, it is necessary to introduce the system of the tentatively named ‘lien decision injunction’.
Fifth, it is necessary to obligate a person to declare his lien.
Sixth, it is necessary to obligate the lien declarant to submit the deposit or deposit guarantee insurance.
The introduction of the improvements presented above would give an opportunity to attempt the procedural stability of the auction.
This study has some limitation in that it failed to make an in-depth investigation due to the lack of court precedents and material. But the types of unjust liens extend to the lien contrary to Prinzip von Treu und Glauben and the unjust lien by the lessee's claim as well as the false and exaggerated lien. And this study has its significance in that it attempted to investigate it by dividing it in terms of the substantial law and the procedural law, thereby laying the foundation for take a look at the improvements of the lien system in the auction procedure of real estate both in a long-term period and in a short-term period.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 3
• 제3절 선행연구 검토 5
• 제2장 부동산경매 및 유치권의 일반적 고찰 9
• 제1절 부동산경매의 일반적 고찰 9
• 1. 부동산경매의 개념 9
• 2. 부동산경매의 법적 성질 11
• 3. 부동산경매의 종류 13
• 4. 부동산경매의 절차 17
• 제2절 부동산경매절차에서의 유치권 37
• 1. 매각준비절차에서 유치권 37
• 2. 매각절차에서의 유치권 38
• 3. 유치권에 대한 구제수단 42
• 제3절 유치권의 이론적 고찰 43
• 1. 유치권에 관한 이론 43
• 2. 실체법·절차법에서의 유치권 60
• 3. 외국의 입법례 62
• 제4절 유치권과 유사한 권리 72
• 1. 동시이행의 항변권 72
• 2. 임대차계약과 임치계약 75
• 3. 상사유치권 76
• 제3장 부당한 유치권의 실태 분석 79
• 제1절 부당한 유치권의 개념과 유형 79
• 1. 부당한 유치권의 개념 79
• 2. 부당한 유치권의 유형 81
• 제2절 부당한 유치권의 판례분석 89
• 1. 허위·과장유치권에 관한 판례분석 89
• 2. 신의칙에 반하는 유치권의 판례분석 96
• 3. 임차인의 부당한청구권에 관한 판례분석 105
• 제3절 부당한 유치권자에 대한 민·형사상의 책임 126
• 1. 부당한 유치권주장에 대한 손해배상책임의 사례 126
• 2. 부당한 유치권주장에 대한 경매방해죄 적용사례 130
• 3. 부당한 유치권주장에 대한 사기미수 및 경매방해죄 적용사례 133
• 4. 부당한 유치권주장에 대한 위증·위증교사·재물손괴죄 적용사례 135
• 제4절 소결 137
• 제4장 부당한 유치권의 문제점과 개선방안 139
• 제1절 부당한 유치권의 문제점 및 폐해 139
• 1. 부당한 유치권에 대한 문제 인식 139
• 2. 실체법상의 문제점 140
• 3. 절차법상의 문제점 144
• 4. 부당한 유치권에 따른 폐해 147
• 제2절 실체법적 측면의 개선방안 150
• 1. 공시제도 불안정성의 문제 150
• 2. 인수주의 문제 153
• 3. 사실상 우선변제권의 문제 154
• 제3절 절차법적 측면의 개선방안 157
• 1. 현황조사 형식화의 문제 157
• 2. 유치권평가미비의 문제 158
• 3. 매각물건명세서 공신력결여의 문제 159
• 4. 유치권권리신고의 문제 160
• 제4절 소결 168
• 제5장 결론 169
• 참 고 문 헌 173
• ABSTRACT 179